Prof. Ashok Jhunjhunwala in conversation with Prof. Devendra Jalihal Episode 1 Part 3 of 3.
Another aspect that I would like to bring up
is that same period; I don't know, ‘81 or ‘82 onwards.
I had…I was teaching some M. Tech. students,
our M. Tech. students were Nandita Dasgupta,
Amitava Dasgupta, both of them who are
faculty. There was one Rajesh Sanghi
who had come from Air Force.
Somehow I got actually quite friendly with them,
very friendly with bunch of them.
So it was not just undergraduate with M. Tech. students,
actually I found…and this is not about individuals,
but I did find that Master’s students,
and from very early onwards we are noting,
that if you put a Master’s students
and undergraduate students together in the same class,
and I very often used to have.
In performance, the undergraduate students
will perform far superior than Master’s students.
But if you take persistence
in trying to do something,
if I give a difficult problem which will take multiple
days and weeks, you will see our Master’s
student doing very well compared to
our undergraduate students.
This is something that I remember
starting to note from 1983 onwards.
And probably IIT still does not fully understand
that the students who come from other colleges,
but are willing to work very hard,
in long run they are as good, and
probably better than our undergraduate students.
This is something that IIT system did not understand.
I started noticing…to me it came as a surprise,
and of course, I had some very good students and all that.
I was, at the same time, starting to work on
various sub systems, particularly after
that WS Industries, I had delivered that
power-line carrier communication, and the only person
who was building systems in the
department for anyone was Professor J. P. Raina
in what we later on termed as Fiber Optics Lab.
I started taking interest in his work
and saw that what he is
trying to build is relatively simple.
His contacts were huge. He had huge defence contacts,
he has contacts in…DRDO,
he had contacts in Ministry of Electronics,
he was very aggressive person,
so he will go and sell them something.
But I also noticed that it…it
particularly since most of…were communication system
he didn't have very good idea how to build it.
But that’s where I came in;
I learnt how to build it.
So one of the first project
that Professor Raina and I did together
was a very interesting project and
tells you a lot about India.
The people from CVRD had come
some defence officers had come,
senior people from DRDO
and said the new people are working on optical fiber
and Professor Raina was just starting to
work on optical fiber.
And he had said what I would
what they would like to do was build a
fiber optic communication system for a battle tank.
Within the tank have a network. Within the tank,
little surprised.
We went and visited CVRD
and I found that the inside of the tank
in which 5 people used to sit
was no bigger than this circle,
in fact, smaller than this.
And everybody would set with their face outward
with that they will not see each other.
Had they said that the we want a fiber optic system
for them to talk to each other.
I said why they are just next to each other?
They made me go on a ride
and I saw that the tank he was making huge noise.
The noise was so much that we
couldn't talk to each other.
So, there is a only way we could do
it using headphones and cables.
So, that's what they were using.
Where did fiber optics come from?
You are talking about 1, 2 maybe 3 voice conversation,
we used to talk about something which
can multiply 64 voice signals and lot of data signals.
Here they were talking about 3, 4 of this and
maybe a few indicator somebody will turn
their light will go on very little data communication,
very little voice communication.
And I said why is it required
there is an interesting story told to us
I don't know whether story is true,
but is a very interesting story this is a story about
when Pakistan had attacked us with Patton tank.
And the Patton tank coming from US was so powerful,
the Pakistani army was marching with the tank
and our we could not just defend anything that
we will shoot at the tank will just
go for a toss it will not penetrate.
The story actually went that till somebody actually
figured out that they will put a person
who will bend down and kind of hide in bushes.
And when the tank will come he will run down
climb up the tank open the hood throw a bomb
and run for his life and he says that is how
India battled and won against Pakistan
in one of the tank.
But what I was told that things became more complicated
even when our tanks were getting deployed
that were nothing else will penetrate,
the confusion was created by a
electronic gun which will just shoot
a radio waves and somehow it will
penetrate the tank at some frequency.
And will create so much of noise
in those cables that it will be
impossible for people to talk to each other
they will put the headphone down
and they will no longer be able to talk to each other.
And if they are not talking to each other gunner is
pointing in direction different from what they should point,
the driver who is taking in one direction,
commander is asking you to do something
and there will be chaos that's a time they will
somebody will run and throw a bomb.
And somebody had told them
that optical fiber no electromagnetic wave
can penetrate which we knew and maybe it can,
if you can make that it will be something that
nobody will be able to disturb and communication
will be very sound very good. They challenged us
to make a system like this and I took
it upon myself say sure we'll build a system.
So, our dream about fiber optics and all this
talk was following up that power-line carrier
communication which was carrying
multiplexing 11 voice signals on a cable.
Here we are able to do hundreds of voice signals
on a cable and here we are actually backed down
to where bandwidth didn't matter where distance
did not matter and we are going to do this
we took upon ourselves to build a system like this.
I don't remember who had funded it, but we built it.
And as we were building it
Rajesh Sanghi who was a M. Tech student from Air Force
deputed here, he was already becoming close
to me and he started working on this project.
And we built this project and having a Air Force officer
and was a huge help because he will do all
the interface with CVRD and with the army officers
and was able to do much better than we could.
He would go get it deployed in the tank test it out,
claimed do everything
and the system was doing very well.
Of course, a tragedy took place
then one day we heard that he was doing this
and the tank was running and they were going and
they will go through difficult terrain tank would,
it was a main battle tank and
it was a just about being tested
and while doing it the tank overturned.
And Rajesh Sanghi hit got hit
his bone here was broken.
Well he was hospitalized, he was cheerful,
he didn't blame us and for him
this is a part of being in the armed forces,
Air Force you get injured this will heal
and we did realize that this will heal.
But it was also clear that with this
small defect that he has in hand
he won't be promoted very high
because there was a rule in these
armed forces and Air Force that up to a certain
rank walls only you can go if you have had
some kind of injury which stays permanent.
So, he was very bright officers did quite well
in the exam man courses and did everything
and done the project.
What will he do?
Meantime we also saw him as a great asset
to our system building effort that here is a person who
would be able to not only translate the defence ideas to us,
but be able to also carry it all the way
to the inside the defence.
And we were now getting contracts from defence you
build this system, build something for aircraft
15 53, 17 73 bus fiber optic system
and we are quite willing to take up this things,
we had by this time 30, 40 people working with us.
I remember we are making we had made
2 megabyte per second system,
8 megabyte per second system,
34 megabyte per second were
just about getting to build.
And we proposed a project I think it was a
Ministry of Electronics plus some defence agency
was also there and we said we will go and build
140 megabyte per second it was state of art
nobody else in the world was in built a
one more 40 megabyte per second.
And I remember going to the meeting in Delhi
it was at IIT Delhi making a presentation,
he says there is nothing here that we don't understand
and I had learnt how to build multiplexing and
everything quite well and the basic challenge is in
actually doing things.
So, we will fail a few times, but
we are better positioned to build
this than any other person.
If any other person can build it in the country
we will be happy we are not the,
but if nobody else can we need to.
Otherwise, forever we will be dependent
and not only one ah megabyte per second
tomorrow 565 everything will be imported
and when I said all this with my passion
they immediately sanctioned plus projects.
So, we had enough money we had large money.
Fortunately, number of our alumni also
were get particularly the ones who were very friendly to us
people like Deepak Khanchandani
who would come back to us.
He they had joined semiconductor complex
the place closed down did not do very well
he was lost and he would come back to us
and work with us. So, we had talent,
we had people we were able to take
students from engineering colleges nearby;
we were able to take students from
engineering colleges nearby.
By that time that had started proliferating
and we were able to train them and do well.
But to be able to do some of these things
we wanted Doctor Sanghi to be with us.
He says you will love to do his PhD with me,
but how does he do that?
Defence will Air Force will not release him,
but we had enough defence project.
So, I remember we had gone all the way
to the scientific Professor I think Abdul Kalam at that time
the DRDO head and myself Professor Raina
went and said we can build all these things we need him to be.
He will do his PhD also please permit him
hence I knew that if you were honest and
speaking and were ready to do something the rules
can be bend and this is what Professor Indiresan
used to always teach us.
You know there are these rules you must understand that,
if you go and try to hit against the rules
you will never be able to penetrate him
there is a huge barrier,
you have to learn to bend the rules.
Ok, it's interesting that you say it because
there is a story I have heard when uh Professor Paulraj
again coming from defence was doing his
M. Tech at IIT Delhi under Professor Indiresan
he saw that Paulraj was very bright,
he wanted him to continue for PhD
and rules didn't permit and he somehow got the rules bent.
So, that Paulraj continues for his PhD
and built the sonar is what I I mean
I don't know if the story is correct,
but this story I have heard.
Must be correct Professor Indiresan
always taught us he will always point out.
And by the time; by the time guidance
and counselling unit had happened he was
I was quite close to him and as I told you
he tried to teach a course also along with me.
And I could reach him and he was very
enthused that I am just trying to do this
he was fully encouraging us.
Let me tell you the rest of the department was
not very friendly to Professor Raina
there was a huge conflict and since
I was working with Professor Raina
they used to also watch me with huge
kind of suspicion.
But people like Professor Radhakrishna Rao,
Professor V G K Murthy
is to know that I am very sincere and
used to kind of encourage me.
So, here we are able to get Doctor Sanghi
and he became one of my early PhD students
of course, I had one or two other one person had
worked on surface acoustic devices one.
Thing about this me I had done my PhD
in surface acoustical devices this is where I could
easily do work publish I did not need anything
except computers I had my first PhD
student Elizabeth Elias who did her PhD work with me.
Actually largely it was understanding this
and then software programming,
but I was bored with that work.
And here is a much more interesting work
that I was doing whether I was doing for main
battle tank or for the aircraft or for
doing things, I got more interested
in fiber optics and system development.
If you remember it was in the process of
doing this that I made a
fiber optic multiplexing kit.
I have taught in United States
for 2 years only and I was teaching here
I knew our students were brighter,
but there was one difference their labs
they used to learn much more than our labs.
Our labs were very boring routine
there was one instrument
that was expensive and we would only take
people and somebody will operate
that instrument and they will take reading
there is no fun very little learning,
this is something that I had
noticed about labs here.
Whereas lab in United States where
there was some kind of full kit given to each
student individually.
And a problem will be given to them
and they will have to build it and is
saw they were used to do it
we used to give them a week before,
they used to prepare for it come,
we'll have a discussion in the beginning,
get them going in the middle of this
we will go around each desk, help them.
There is a huge learning for them and for us
out here the labs had no learning.
The students were bored, they used to cut corners.
I had been talking to head of the department
other senior faculty that why can't we create,
so many kits and people
sort of said well we don't have money.
So, this kind of inspired me that
we can build the kits and make it low cost.
And since I had learned enough about
multiplexing a lot of interesting things
you can teach about multiplexing,
the synchronisation, lack of synchronisation,
bit synchronisation, byte synchronisation,
clock synchronisation, failure of that,
multiplexing, channel switching time switching
all of this you could do in a fiber optic kit.
And I had got a undergraduate student
to work with me to build that kit
and we had commercialised that.
I will talk more about it initially
with universal then with my benchmark systems
I will talk more about it, till today
I am known in colleges all over the country
as a person who had designed that kit.
Even today I get 40 year 35 years
down the line I we every year
get some royalties on that kit.
That kit has taught simple multiplexing and
communication to very large
number of people all over the country.
We'll come back to that later on,
but what I was pointing out that we were
building systems initially for defence and
for Minister of Electronics and building
complex system and used to employ a
large number of people.
At the same time the industry was showing some interest.
So, while I used to work on this defence project
and other projects with Professor Raina
some industries were coming to me personally
and I was in laser communication lab
building some of the projects and employing them.
There is a interesting thing that I want to point out
it's about India and about Tamil Nadu.
In my first year after I came here
very often I will find that somebody
totally unknown to me comes to me
with his son or a daughter
15, 16 year old son and daughter
they will somehow get to meet me.
And basically talk to me only one thing
meet my son meet, see my daughter,
how bright they are, how well they are doing in school
they want to study engineering,
get them admission in IIT,
help them get the admission.
By knew now I knew enough about JE of course
I myself was had done JE I knew that IIT
there was not no possibility and I used to
sort of say they have to write this exam they said
they will not get through.
Then I said well then you have to go to other colleges
and they will say they are not there are no
colleges and they are we cannot get in.
At that time '82 or '83 I '82 I remember
doing some study and I found that there were hardly about
100 engineering colleges around the country
having only 20,000 students.
That time we are closing to 800 million population
20,000 students, people were hungry
to learn there are no engineering colleges.
And this is a time '84 or '85, '84
probably or '85 MGR and Jayalalitha came up
with a policy of private engineering colleges,
set up this private engineering colleges.
IIT was huge was fully opposed to it
everybody used to sort of say there will be poor teacher,
poor quality, it is a money making,
they will take large amount of money.
And it was truth also many of these
colleges were very poor quality,
money making proposition for some politicians.
But there are also colleges which were
attempting to teach them.
Initially I was opposing that just like
any other IIT, but soon realized that
when we have denied the children opportunity
to learn engineering and this is providing them
is it fair on our part to oppose them.
Remember this is the first the time
here the IIT ecosystem says that
we should oppose them quality; quality; quality,
superiority first time started questioning all of these things.
Partly my PPSD background probably helped
and I had to often stand against our own colleagues
and sort of say no you should allow them.
And you know incidentally what helped
that children of many of the faculty.
yeah who are not getting into IIT and
were trying to send it to this
started siding with me,
what I am pointing out that I this is the; this is the first time
and I was very young at that time,
I stood against IIT opinion.
Long run I think it was a very very important thing,
I started talking about it.
Of course, process was going on independent of me,
but this large number of engineering colleges were coming up
and these youngsters were getting trained.
And we suddenly found that we will I will be able to
recruit them as a project staff for our M. Tech or
things like that and they were doing very well,
they of course, I realized by now that
there were some colleges where they will getting some minimum
training not enough.
But the youngsters were
very bright after all the students who got into IIT
and didn't get into IIT the marked difference was hardly anything
by now I had figured out the whole JE
there was hardly anything they were
very bright they didn't get the opportunity.
And you provided them opportunity in your lab
initially in fiber Optics Communication Lab
laser on later on Laser Communication Lab
and they will flower up.
And I already had seen
our M. Tech students who came from tier 2. Colleges
Colleges were doing well.
And suddenly I found that
well all you need to do is give them opportunity
push them train them hard you have to do a little more
personal handholding create
confidence that they are doing big things.
And they will come become very good technologist.
This was a very important lesson that I
learned as early as '86, '87, '88
which I actually continued.
And whether I did
whatever I have done till from that time till today
that that there is a law in India
the biggest strength it is human resources.
Yes IIT is one thing, but it doesn't matter
that is very large I was not now bothered that
IIT students will go abroad let them.
There are enough others; there are enough others
and all that we need to do is train them
push them hard and they will deliver
this is something that we saw
do happening again and again.
I will tell you couple of other things that happened
which actually started changing my whole
mind frame which you will see.
Two incidents I remember was happening in India
other than the engineering college,
you know at that time the only washing powder that
we had in India was Surf or known.
I used to also buy that it was expensive.
So, I used to buy and use it occasionally
rest of the time used to use the soap
and that time suddenly we heard of Nirma,
huge advertisement in radio
and think that you will hear about Nirma
it is a very poor quality washing powder,
it will burn your hands.
Very similar to the way we IIT will talk about it's
private engineering college is a very
similar putting down this,
but large number it was very inexpensive one fourth
the price of
and I started was occasionally using
it little care and it cleaned.
It had a little more bleaching so
it hurt the hand a bit you have to care be careful,
it cleaned the clothes very well of course it
hurt the clothes also in long run, but
how did it matter.
I certainly found that Nirma crossed the total sales
on Surf and became the dominant
and Surf was going on opposing with all
intellectuals like us supporting them this is a
quality product and that is poor quality.
And suddenly we found after some time
when the that will nearly lost the market from
dominant situation that they came with a cheaper
powder very similar to Nirma powder.
And then we realized that what
India is I learnt about India that India
is a large market for affordable product.
Surf was only to service 4, 5
percent of our population,
high cost similar to maybe the cost abroad
only a few percentage of people will be able to afford it.
But if you are able to get the product at the right
price point the market becomes very large and new
industries can come up.
It gave a huge
huge impetus to me that new industries can be
created only if you can make
product which are affordable.
Whole scenario thinking started changing
a second very similar incident took place
with telecom by that time
Rajiv Gandhi was in power hm and he brought
this person Sam Pitroda from somewhere.
And I remember getting invited in one meeting
because I was doing enough with industry and all that.
And that is a place where he was talking about
why number of telephones are limited and you
cannot uh give enough phones and
you know making a long distance call.
I remember in IIT Kanpur
I in my 5 years I made 2 calls to home.
The reason number one I had to wait between 4 to 6 hours
to after booking a call to get a call,
I had to wait outside the telephone exchange
you will book and you will wait outside
and you will get a call suddenly the trunk call is now available
and you can make a call.
The cost of that call was equivalent to
30 percent of my monthly mess bill
one call, you could neither afford
and you had a long waiting period.
So, in one of the conversation that took place in Delhi
with Sam Pitroda people pointed out yes
number of trunk lines are limited and by the way
where we are building power-line carrier communication
or fiber optic multiplexing primarily to increase the
number of trunk lines between cities
that was the objective by that time
I had understood.
If we can build that enough we can,
but it was expensive and so the calls will be expensive.
Till somebody pointed out
then in the night time these were hardly ever used,
it was empty and the telephones were not available
and that time in one of the meeting
basically the idea came that why can't
we create this FL telephone we will put a
telephone at a FL shop and people will
go and make a call pay for it.
And maybe in the night time we will make STD
calls at evening time half rate
night time quarter rates
everybody in department was opposed loss of revenue
this that same thing that you hear,
Sam Pitroda took the decision I will do that.
And I remember he is asking me that,
but you know my STD PCO machine is expensive.
Can you build a low cost metering
which will tell how much is the bill,
so that the person can pay?
And I think we took up and I was I remember
there was one one Sanjay Gupta undergraduate student
with him actually I built that
and I gave it to him in the meantime
multiple things were built and this STD PCO started
what is very interesting this STD
PCO started and very soon it was there
in every street corner we had initially planned
10,000 of them it became 100,000
and more many more.
This STD PCO really moved me because
what I found I myself could go there and make calls,
but people used to stand in queues
to make call in the evenings
they used to wait for 8 PM.
And then 11 PM. Yeah
And people will make calls and
people are very happy and it was became affordable.
So, I suddenly saw affordability has huge power
and this STD PCO person was actually
making enough money initially the government had talked about
subsidy very soon it was forgotten this FL,
it it was no longer a FL shop
it became a STD PCO itself
and the person started selling multiple other things. Yeah
the business grew these were entrepreneurs who were growing
and we had suddenly created
I think a million PCOs over that 2, 3 years.
We went to remote areas and created that,
that area will get developed there are enough storeys
that I remember going through
where in a remote area this place will do.
Because there is a now STD PCO
there the women will be more easy ready to
come and first the all the
car auto repair shops will come around,
people will make it a taxi stand, bus stand will come
some small factories will set up.
Women will be more ready to come and work there
because that phone provided them safety
and that whole area will develop.
I suddenly realize that entrepreneurship
both with Nirma and this STD PCO is
what India needs affordable technology
is what India needs entrepreneurship
and affordable technology will make India grow
more rapidly than anything else,
by this time my dream of or thinking that politics
will change things had gone.
Now, I have totally I mean particularly after that
Sikh riots that took place completely shook me.
And then the Bhopal gas FL I knew
politics is not the right thing.
And entrepreneurship and affordable
technology developed in India.
Training the human strength resources our biggest strength
creating large human resources engineering manpower,
training them IIT cannot remain in its own
elite structure, it has to reach out to them,
work with them masters,
but project staff
project staff became very important.
Train them, take up projects, do things, work with industry,
transform industry this basically
was my early learning from 1981 till '86, '87.
Entrepreneurship will become the best way
for countries development.
Affordable technology is the only way
that India will developed its market.
And India has large market
if the products are affordable,
it can change the game
and we have to believe on our human resources.
My thinking considerably changed
and it is at this stage that I started
looking at larger issues.
And very fortunately
after a lot of battle within the department,
I said we have to allow people to come in
7 years, 8 years before me
nobody had come, 7 years after I came nobody.
Joined or 6 years till we pulled in and I helped
in getting Bhaskar Ramamurthi, Anthony Reddy asked me.
to get it and I somehow pushed it.
Professor Indiresan tried his best to change IIT
this place was too conservative would not allow him to change.
That conservative trend continues even today
and is a huge difference between IIT Kanpur
and IIT madras in that.
Even today if we are not doing better than
what we should it is because of that conservatism.
And one thing that I learnt that you have to fight against
conservating you have to take risk.
And whether we did wireless in local loop or where we did
this we started incubating companies Banyan,
Midas whether we created research park
or incubation cell or our work electric vehicles
or solar DC was always defying the
tradition I am doing something new.
Another thing I would like to end today
by stating that if you see from surface acoustic wave
I had got into digital circuits and systems,
microprocessor based systems,
fiber optic systems and next was wireless.
If you say I had never stayed in one area.
In fact, my 8 PhD students have worked in 8
totally different areas everything you start from
scratch and do it.
This is not what IIT does,
IIT to some extent doesn't even respect that.
this whole thing that you have to publish,
yes you have to be in a one area,
you have to build the ecosystem their whole
what is this called h index etcetera comes from all that
here you are jumping from one thing to another.
I had made my path very clear
that I am not going to follow the tradition
and I will fight against all conservative thing
and in spite of everything I will do,
IIT continues to be conservative
and still becomes a bottleneck on many things.
I have questions on that, I think we we will take it up
about how you know this this this 2 models
of university based education or
research you know we can reconcile, yes.
- Contribute
to the Centre -
Monetary
Support - Digital
Material
Prof. S.N. Majhi in conversation with Prof. S. Sundar
Good morning.
Good morning Sundar.
I am so happy that. Yeah, yeah.
Very happy to have you here again.
I am very happy I am happy. At IIT Madras for this conversation.
Of course, I was your student and I did my Ph.D. here.
Our student. Yeah.
So, in fact I used to really enjoy your lectures,
your style of teaching,
also your way of helping the students at various stages.
And, in fact that period was really one of the best
student period which I have I ever seen in my student life
at IIT Madras, and in particular that Department of Mathematics.
And even further with Professor S.N. Majhi is always a
special thing not only to me
it is also for all the students who were there at that time.
So, we are very happy to have you here today for this conversation.
And thanks for coming.
In fact, I must thank Professor Achuthan, your guide.
Oh ok.
Wonderful person and he brought you in contact with us.
Yeah. And I was so fortunate to have research scholars like you
who used to be very helpful to every aspect of our department's life activities.
it’s it’s good that we are recalling Professor P. Achuthan, it is nice sir.
Please tell me about your the first day at IIT Madras,
which many of us knew about through our Heritage Centre.
But listening from a person
where that is at the beginning of IIT Madras
it would be very fantastic.
So, please tell me about your career or your
even from the first day in a very short form from IIT Madras until you are,
you are professor at IIT Madras until your super envision.
In a nutshell, I will give you something before my joining here.
Yes sir, please sir.
I was the student of M.Sc. in Banaras Hindu University.
I did not know at that time there is a Ph.D. beyond M.Sc. also.
ok. After my passing out from Banaras Hindu University
with a good division and rank also.
Which was what year sir? Banaras. M.Sc.
Hindu University that was 1964 actually. Ok, sir.
I joined 62 and came out.
64, in 64. 64, I was offered a job in Khallikote College.
Ok. Brahmapur, Orissa.
I joined that because it was my college also
when I was studying my intermediate.
Ok. Then, I realised if there is a higher degree available
and I have to do that. ok.
So, I wanted to go to to BHU again for my research in real analysis.
Ok. In between,
one of my good friend he wrote to me, why do not you come to IIT Madras?
Who asked that?
Gopala Krishnan. Ok.
One Professor Gopala Krishnan, who was my classmate at Banaras. Ok.
He joined here as a research scholar.
So, he wrote to me why don't you come over here?
So, he is he was also belong the student of mathematics?
Right, right, my classmate. Ok, ok, ok.
In fact, he was also with Khallikote College for few months
then he left, joined here.
That is where I got the idea I have to do my Ph.D. So,
through your classmate you came to know that
there is one Indian Institute of Technology. Technology
At Madras.
Then, I applied, I came here for interview.
Ok. First day, I stayed in Gopala Krishnan’s room in Kaveri hostel.
Oh, great. That was Kaveri hostel day.
It was a beautiful gathering, lot of cultural programme
and the lecture of our director at that time.
What was the month? Ramachandran.
Month roughly
July or? September I think September.
1964 65.
65, ok, ok sorry.
Then somehow I got impressed I wanted to join,
but at the same time I used to like my the BHU guide
with whom I wanted to do also.
So, I went to BHU, I got a scholarship also from UGC.
Ok. So, I went to BHU, thought of
working with my favourite faculty up there.
But when he heard I got a scholarship at IIT Madras,
immediately told that I won't take you now.
Oh, You go to IIT Madras.
You got such a good offer and you please go over there.
I was with heavy heart, I came
and. So, when you are student even that time
one of the very prominent,
one of the most sought after institute is IIT Madras.
Yes. Till till today IIT Madras is
is maintaining that reputation.
It is nice to know that.
And I came, joined my guide after some time,
it was personally come fortunately because Great, great.
He was also a guide of my friend Gopala Krishnan. Ok, ok, ok.
So, we both from BHU.
So, Professor S. D. Nigam. Nigam.
So, who is one of pioneer in fluid dynamics.
Fluid he asked me one day,
do you know what is fluid mechanics? Oh, ok
I told I know the meaning of fluid,
I know the meaning of mechanics
but inside of fluid mechanics
I am not much informed. Ok, ok.
You join here in fluid mechanics that is how I joined
and did my research under his guidance, very efficient guide.
I think you know he is passed, no more. Oh, yeah.
2014 he expired.
He is a stalwart
and he was having lot of reputation internationally
and we are very fortunate he guided us.
Sir, if I remember correctly when I came to know about IIT Madras
mathematics department,
they always talk about two main personalities,
one is Professor S. D. Nigam and another is Professor is S. K. Srinivasan.
Right, you are right. So, you are the student of
Professor S. D. Nigam which is really and
And Professor Srinivasan wonderful soul,
very sympathetic kind.
Both Professor Srinivasan and Professor S. D. Nigam
are very good friends, good understanding.
I think you know that
when the institute started one Professor Hoon.
From. He guided the department’s activities as
head of the Department.
Then, Professor S. K. Srinivasan joined as assistant professor,
he was head of the department. Ok.
Heading the department.
Then of course, he become professor and
he happens to be a student of Alladi Ramakrishnan,
Professor Alladi Ramakrishnan. Ramakrishnan.
The math science fame.
Institute of Mathematical Sciences. Yes,
math science started in 1962,
but Professor Srinivasan was a student in the University of Madras.
Ok. From there he got his degree.
And Professor Srinivasan whose student was Professor Achuthan.
Yes. And theoretical physics
he was also a stochastic process stalwart, operational research.
He wrote quite number of good books Professor Srinivasan.
Soft spoken person.
He guided the department very nicely
and in cooperation with Professor Nigam.
Yeah. Though Professor Nigam has taken the headship,
I think it was 62
Professor Nigam came from Kharagpur IIT.
Ok to IIT Madras, ok Yes.
So, he joined here and headed the department.
How was your Ph.D. student?
As a student career you mean? Yeah.
Actually our day used to start at 7:30
and used to end at 12:30 night.
Ok. You know used to be there along with us Professor Nigam
also used to be with us,
not he alone, his students his scholars,
even some of the engineering Ph.D. scholars used to come.
Ok. To take his guidance, his suggestions,
clarification of some doubts etc.
He is a wonderful guide and teacher.
So, that time you mean to say your
day begins at 7:30 in the morning.
So, you finish your breakfast at Kaveri hostel then.
In between, we used to go and come. Ok.
And Professor Nigam also used to go and come.
I remember when he bought his first ambassador. Ok.
He was quite happy that the period of going coming will be sorted.
Ok. Earlier used to go by cycle and sometimes by walk.
Ok. But after his ambassador arrived,
he was quite happy that he is coming quite early and
and also can go comfortably.
So, the department right now in HSB in first floor.
So, it is in the same location? Same location.
Or. Same location.
And our group of research scholars under him
Sir Professor S. D. S. D. Nigam Used to find.
fluid dynamics team.
Fluid mechanics group. Yeah.
We find a kind of family atmosphere. Oh, great.
We helping each other,
discussing each other’s problem
in presence of Professor Nigam.
I remember one thing,
I have to do some calculations for my thesis
and you know once with other is on machine Brunswick. Yes.
Calculating machine was there are two types of things,
and I used to use that.
It took me almost 6 months to produce my numerical results. Oh.
But in between, I think
Guindy Engineering College,
they got a computer and they gave some slot for IIT Madras.
Ok. So, our IIT Madras students used to go there,
faculty as well as students, but there is a queue heavy queue.
So, many people go there in that slot.
So, we mathematics department people generally.
Even I remember during my time as a Ph.D.,
we used to go to as a Ph.D. scholar
we used to go to computer centre and get the.
Oh yeah. Our slot for for the numerical computation,
we need to get our slot.
We go in the morning and.
Yeah. Try to book our slot.
In fact, in between German government offered
the advanced computer at that time to our.
Alright. IIT and they offered our IIT
requested our department to look after that.
Ok. Under their care.
At that time Professor Nigam was hesitant
because he is not very sure how he can
organize, manage, he excused himself. Ok.
At that time Professor Sampath was
there in the electrical engineering department. Ok.
I think he was the head.
He readily agreed that he will look after that. Ok.
So, that is how the computer aspects,
the centre started under the electrical
engineer department. Electrical department. Oh, nice nice to know sir.
Then it separated. Sir, how many years you
took to complete your Ph.D.?
To be very frank, it is a very
a great privilege to be a student of Professor Nigam.
Yes sir.
He brings beautiful ideas.
He inspires the students to bring the suggestions from themselves,
though he knows what suggestions come out
because he has already built within us, the ideas and suggestions.
Ok, nice. After we bring the suggestions
and the problem is defined, he used to appreciate us.
Nice sir.
And every day, there are 5 to 6 research scholars who are there,
he will call us each one of us he will give half an hour almost.
Oh, everyday. Everyday.
Oh, good sir.
Sometimes suppose we are busy
and he does not want to disturb us,
he can guess, he will come and stand behind us.
Ok. He won’t talk and stand behind us
and we know that he has come to know what we are doing.
We explain him, then he goes.
Like that I brought my problems within a span of 18 months.
Oh. All my thesis problems are defined.
Very nice. Another say 5 to 6 months the solutions are all ready.
Good sir. Another 4 to 5 months I wrote my thesis.
So, you finished the everything your entire thesis work in 3 years time.
Because 3 year oh. In fact less than 3 years.
But I used to take our analysis to give lectures elsewhere.
Ok. Our problems, he will take and give lectures also in our presence.
Oh, very good.
Somebody is asking a question, he will point out the finger to us.
So, that shows the. Though he can answer.
That shows. But he wanted us.
That is how he used to make us understand the whole
situation very clearly and used to also discuss among ourselves.
In his presence we used to discuss ourselves also,
the problem of our problem with others
that is how the thesis get shaped.
And writing also, the longest part of it,
the wordings, everything he will inspire and bring out of us.
So, that is the basically the the pillars. Inspiration. And
where the department has groomed to this level.
So, I wanted to inform you that because
share you this information last 2 years,
in fact last 3 years our department
is one of the top 200
QS world ranking and subject-wise mathematics.
Yes, I have
read that news also
on IIT. Even IIT 17 this is top top 200,
200 rank and this one among the
the mathematics department in India,
we are ranked number 1 along with IIT Bombay and
other institutes as per the QS, you know, world ranking.
So, it is the the pillar set by Professor Nigam,
Professor S. K. Srinivasan and further pillar set by
Professor Majhi and others
who brought the department to this level.
So, just I wanted to share this information you are keeping. Thank you.
Still this same tradition.
So, and after your Ph.D. you immediately joined here as a faculty
as a lecturer or you went somewhere and come and came back?
In fact, I joined as a research scholar 65, 1965.
Got my Ph.D. in 69 ok
convocation.
But my. Since you said it is a convocation, today
IIT Madras it is very clear July
3rd Friday is the convocation day.
What was the convocation day during that time in 1960?
Frankly, I do not remember this. Ok.
But we use to have our convocation in the Open Air Theatre. Ok.
Open Air Theatre. I I was talking something about.
Yeah that there is you said. Joining. Joining.
68 I joined as a technical assistant, senior technical assistant.
I will tell you the reason though there was an offer for
associate lecturership, Professor Nigam called me, he told me
associate lectureship is higher level posts
than STA that is good that we can offer you, but it is a temporary post.
It is not a kind of a permanent.
Ok. I will suggest you take senior technical assistant position.
Ok. And it would be a permanent position.
So, want you here with us. Ok.
Because if you join as associate lecturer you may like to go somewhere else.
It cannot be a permanent you see.
That is how joined in technical. Ok.
But this is not much of difference in our status in the department.
They used to honour, all of us used to honour each other.
Position is immaterial.
So, when you joined as STA,
the 1968, how many faculty were there in the department?
I think there was around 15 to 17 faculty were there.
Oh, ok. And technical assistant, I think 3 of us.
Even Professor Achuthan joined also a technical assistant. ok, ok
He is one of the very very intelligent and very
good person with heart, in his heart,
help helping nature, and intelligent knowledgeable.
Then as an STA we used also teach M.Sc. classes, there is no bar. Ok.
We are basically faculty as such, though we are called technical assistance.
Ok, ok. Of course, then you are given the promotion to lectureship.
When did you? After 3 years.
Oh, after 3 years you got the.
Some maybe 72 around.
So, Professor Majhi, when I during my period as a
as a student from outside when I before entering to IIT Madras,
whenever we say about the fluid dynamics,
fluid mechanics, continuum mechanics area and
in particular that is in general across the world
your your name is very well-known.
And also in particular in Indian,
across India various institutes those who are working in this
same area they know about you are a well-known
a researcher and well-known teacher.
And how did you from the research point of view,
how did you, till you are student of
Professor S. D. Nigam that is one part.
But after that when you joined as a faculty
and along with Professor S. D. Nigam,
but you have created your own
domain of research and you have excelled.
So, please share share your views on how did you?
Yeah, fluid mechanics. For this.
The basic thing I did my research.
I had interaction with the engineering departments also.
There was one Matthews who was working in applied mechanics,
he used to come and sit with me for his research work.
Ok. And also those he was with the German guide,
but he used to come and sit with us, and
some of our work jointly published which found in books also.
That is how I got an inspiration to go towards engineering side.
Application of. Ok.
Fluid mechanics in engineering side. Ok, ok, ok.
Later you know the space science developed. Yes.
And people have gone to the space.
Then the microgravity aspects
how it affects our system that attracted my attention.
We all are grown under one gravity,
on the earth from childhood to the adulthood,
but when we go up there, there is no gravity or microgravity
let us so how the things will effect that area attracted me.
I did some work in that area along with two of my students.
Oh. In fact, during our international conference
I am not able to remember his name, he visited
though it is there in my tongue tip
he visited and I had a discussion with him.
Ok. Then, he saw something new in my discussion.
Ok. Then, he asked did you,
can you experimentally prove it he asked. The Bolus Flow.
Ok. It is called Bolus Flow. The flow of blood
goes in our arteries or veins even capillaries with certain gaps in between.
Ok. So, one Megha Singh was there in applied mechanics. Oh, Professor
Megha Singh. Professor Megha Singh.
Yeah. We both went to
Japan to attend an international conference.
During our visit we discussed at certain aspects
he told I have facilities in my lab in IIT Madras of course.
Then he did some experiment and our theoretical things are all there.
Oh. Experimentally, it is proved.
Oh. And one of his students submitted the thesis also
in that experiment things. Oh, that time itself you nicely
put your theory and compared with the
experiment and. Experiments
It was really.
So, this is how I diverted towards the microgravity.
Ok. Analysis, and so I did in mathematical modelling also certain aspects.
Like that my area become fluid mechanics,
micro gravity, mathematical modelling. Very good sir. Nice
Sir I want to ask you one thing just
during your time here as a faculty,
you have taken over some some important
positions, administrative positions.
For example, you are a secretary of Film Club.
Film Society it is called. And till today
Film Club film.
Film Society. Film Society. Is also a treasurer.
Yeah. Today if you look at the OAT that Saturday
8 o’clock come what may exactly 8 o’clock, there will be a movie.
Today, it has gone to a much digital and an advanced
level OAT is one of the best place to view the movies.
So, how was those days when you started your
this Film Society activities?
In fact, from my childhood I used to like group work,
joining with other people and participating in activities,
society activities in high schools even elementary schools such as.
So, here also that facility was very much there in IIT Madras.
I was a founder member of Faculty Club,
Faculty Association. Oh, Faculty Association.
Where do you also.
I was also president, right. Led that as the chairman of that.
And I was associate of the Staff Club.
Oh, ok or. Then, there was one of our
important person in humanities it is Rama Rao,
suddenly he expired he was associate lecturer
with 2 kids and wife having no sufficient to support
associate lecturer which was not a permanent position. Permanent position.
So, to get pension etc. not there.
So, we wanted to support the family by sharing from among ourselves.
Good sir. So, Professor Nigam
was the chairman of that committee. Ok.
I was the secretary of that committee.
That is how I came in contact with humanities department closely.
Professor Nagendra was at humanities, later he joined our mathematics.
The statistician. I could find a good friend with with him.
One Professor Krishna Rao who is with us no more,
he was also very friendly with us.
In fact, I remember when I was in Kaveri hostel as a research scholar;
he used to come to the Kaveri hostel to play
what is that called table not, yeah.
Table tennis. Table tennis,
he was very interesting. I also developed a good relation.
This Film Society, those Film Club was here at that time,
but Film Society was something different aspect.
Film society is that group of people who are interested in old movies.
Ok. Those movies were what is that called,
there is a some group that is called
I do not remember the name right now.
So, these old films, awarded films,
so those films they wanted to see
in our IIT students. So, you used OAT or
the CLT. Private, private means in rooms.
Rooms, ok, ok. Small rooms. CLT.
Let us say at that time CLT was. CLT was there. Ok.
We used to use it. Ok.
Then Krishna Rao and then suggested
how about having a society of that type
because generally people won’t be interested
to see some the classical movies and old movies,
awarded movies, they wanted this dancing phenomena and Ok.
These love, but these things has some deep rooted philosophy etc.
So, he agreed.
That is how we framed a group in IIT Madras,
got approval of the administration and a society was formed.
Krishna Rao was the chairman and I was the secretary
and one Kesavan happens to be the treasurer.
During that time also we thought of
having one parent teachers forum of Central School.
Our Kendriya
Kendriya Vidyalaya. Oh.
And I was the treasurer of that. Oh.
And that also went on very well.
We saved quite a good amount, then we installed a prize.
Prize means the person alternatively from Central School and Vana Vani,
whose gets the position first position in IIT
selection among the day students he gets that prize.
Still it is continuing. Oh, very nice, very very good.
Another thing I will tell you,
Professor Ananth was professor in charge of Gymkhana, student affairs.
Ok. He called one day, told Professor Majhi
why don't you join with us as a treasurer? So.
And I joined there also.
During my time I found out that are 4 to 5 different
accounts are being maintained, individually people are operating.
I brought to the knowledge of Ananth later also it was Professor Natarajan
who came to that position, I brought to their notice.
There also surprised, how is it happening,
students operating one, some faculty advisor operating one.
No, it should not be.
So, we brought all those amounts in one account,
operated to be operated by 2 people.
Oh, ok. So, today whatever procedure we see
you are the. So, that is going on
very well. You are you are that person
who introduced all those.
And in our department. Changes.
Ramanujan Day celebrations.
Yeah, yeah, yeah
it is also there. That also came.
Even even today December 22nd,
whatever be the case
22nd is the day of we celebrate Ramanujan Day which
where when; when did you start the
the celebrating this? In fact, I must thank you also.
oh, You remember our international conference?
It was when I was a student, it was 1988.
That is first one. Yeah.
And the next one.
It was that is international conference on Industrial Max or.
Yeah, yeah. Yeah that was in 2001,
but in. It is, but in 1987.
Before to that, yes as a student.
Yeah, as a student, ok in 1987
there was a that. Conference.
Big. Yeah, I remember.
International conference on mathematics which was held here
which I remember. So, we during that conference all of you helped us.
so much Yes, yes. And not only. In fact. IIT Madras, also
Institute of Mathematical Sciences and University of Madras combined
together and we had it the entire event took place here.
I even remember sir. Even some
private. As a student, I remember, yeah.
Private engineering colleges. Colleges, yeah.
And all of you conducted. In fact we are all there,
but all the working aspects are done by you. Yeah,
sir we got lot of experience. And there was one
another student with you who has gone to Guindy Engineering College.
Yeah, now he is a Professor M. Venkatesan.
Venkatesan. Yes
And Vetrivel. Yeah, Professor Vetrivel, yes.
And all these people who are
so dynamic that gave us a confidence we raised a lot of funds,
then International Group were there and they are
so appreciative etc. etc.
During that time I think we put a
foundation also about mathematical modelling. Yes.
You went to Germany.
Yeah, I went to.
German. I got the opportunity
because of the conference. Yeah.
I got a some kind of contact
then I went to Germany.
From the conference
you got the contact. Yes, yes, yes.
went and that till today that contact is very strong going on.
Yes sir, yes sir, yes sir, yes sir. During that time we saved lot of funds.
I remember we saved around 40,000 rupees.
Oh, at that time, oh. At that time.
That time sir.
You are really the finance minister of Department of Mathematics.
So, that amount there was lot of discussion we had,
what to be done, we put it in a fixed deposit
and decided to conduct every year
Ramanujan Day celebration. Ok. Yes sir.
In that amount. Till today.
It is. We take that the interest money.
Right. Now, we are getting around say near about
50 to 60,000 which is.
Right. Good enough for us to
organize this 20 century that is the seed which you
you put and that is what which is helping. I am proud of you
actually because you are the flag bearer afterwards. Oh, thank you sir.
Indeed. But Another aspect I remember,
I was given the responsibility of professor in charge of
SCST Oh, that is very nice.
Professor Kuriakose, chemistry department, he was the
student associated professor in charge of student activities.
Ok. He called one day, asked me, in fact
Professor Achuthan was in charge before me.
Ok. Maybe he might have asked Professor Achuthan after you who should be,
Professor Achuthan might have told Professor Majhi is there.
So, he called me, asked me can you join as a adviser to SCST group?
Generally, that confidence as such was not much,
but it was Professor Kuriakose of all the people
and he also qualified his request, don’t worry I am with you.
Oh. So, I did.
So, it’s a it’s a great service you you did.
During that time I will tell you one incident.
One of the Vice Chancellors daughter was our student.
The Vice Chancellor happens to be only a SCST person.
Ok. One of the Vice Chancellors.
One day I asked the daughter because she was getting all facilities
free, hostel free, food, books, etc.,
I asked her would you really need this?
She was bit confused.
I told if you do not need it, this can go to somebody else.
Oh, nice. There will be very much
suffering people and the institute may offer this to that.
She told I will ask my father. Ok.
Next day she came told my father says since it is a privilege,
let us enjoy it. Ok. So, that is one incident I will tell you. Nice
sir. And during that time also, there is some
grants used to come to our section
and we used to manage our things with that,
some get togethers and all those things.
We saved some funds. Oh.
Professor Kuriakose and myself from that we saved some.
It was it was really a great thing And that amount was
put again in a fixed deposit to be given as a
scholarship or some financial aid to required student of SCST.
Oh, nice. I understand that is still going on.
So, I want to ask you the next question.
Today, in Department of Mathematics we have a
programme in Master of Technology in Industrial
Mathematics and Scientific Computing.
And this is one of the the unique programme in India today.
But when it was started I think you are the one of the
the the brain begin, begin this particular programme.
Yes. Because already it is, if I remember it is already 17 years
and now the programme is going in in a in a much
in which it it has got lot of. Yes.
Acceptability across India.
And with lot of collaborations from Germany, from all other
countries, and our students are doing extremely well.
I want to know how this idea came up to start such
Master of Technology in Industrial Mathematics at IIT Madras.
Till today, it is one of the unique program in India.
So, how this thought process came came to you
and you started the course on mathematical modelling in industry.
Till today that is the one of the popular course.
So, how this idea came out? Yes it evolve, it is almost need based.
There was all the time people used to talk with modelling aspects.
In in fact I appreciate one statement;
mathematics is theoretical engineering,
engineering is a applied mathematics.
Ok. So, that statement is very inspiring type
of statement people have always brought.
So, mathematical models are all there,
we thought why not a course can be developed.
I think that course is not evolved here for the first time;
it was there elsewhere in foreign countries.
Yeah, I am. In Germany; at financial.
But in India. Modelling.
That was the.
First time. Yeah.
Then we thought, in fact I always bring Professor Achuthan’s name,
I sat with him we both discussed
how about having a course in mathematical modelling?
Then we thought course in math; is there any books available? We searched.
We got books, then we thought why not frame a course?
Professor Achuthan asked me frame one.
Oh. So, we framed a course,
we got approved by the institute academic section etc.
Then, we offered it, to our surprise quite
number of first it went as an elective
engineering people they offered to come and attend.
Some faculty attended, some research scholars attended.
So, he got encouraged.
So, I gave that course because since I framed the course,
so it was my responsibility to see that it is given.
Yes sir, after your super? envision
it was me who
Prof. S. Sundar: teaching this course till today. Prof. S.N. Majhi: taken up very appropriately very appropriately.
Yeah. And of course, you revised. Now, I see
lot of the modern thoughts have gone into.
Then, we conducted that International Conference of Mathematical
Modelling. Modelling.
Pool from abroad came, they all
discussed, they presented papers, ideas came.
So, this industrial mathematics M.Tech. course
it it is a kind of automatically got generated,
not by any single person.
I think independently 3 to 4 of us we thought about it.
Right sir, right.
At that time Professor Parthasarathy was.
Professor P. R. Parthasarathy. P. R. Parthasarathy
was a head of the department. Head of the department.
And of course, we thought during our time, but
to to take its shape it took time, later debates are there this and that.
Then, Professor Parthasarathy has taken the responsibility after me.
And we framed, that continued, our discussion continued to,
one day Professor Usha came to my room we both sat and framed a write up.
Ok. To be sent to the director, we framed a write up.
This write up it played a good role and you people have gone to Germany.
Yes. And came and that also gave lot of good contact.
Then, there was not much favour in our department as such to start with.
Even in engineering departments there are bit
sceptical asking, how come M.Tech. course in a science department.
Ok. In senate we debated over it.
Oh. In one of the debates it was pointed out
that Delhi IIT has an M.Tech. course in computer science area.
Offered by by maths department. Mathematics department offers it,
that is where Professor Natarajan got an idea
and asked Professor Muthukrishnan to note it.
Oh, Professor R. Natarajan he was in in the director. Director.
Professor Muthukrishnan was deputy director. Deputy Director. Yeah, nice.
Ananth used to be dean of
academic courses. Academic courses. Very nice
those were helped us. They 3 helped us a lot.
And fortunately your good friend from calls what is that.
Is Kaiserslautern.
Kaiserslautern. Technical University.
Good friend.
Professor Helmut Neunzert. He visited.
Helmut Neunzert. And you are also joined
from Kharagpur IIT. True, true, true. To our at that time. Yes.
And that is fair things daily evolve.
And I remember Professor Natarajan
invited what is the German professor? Professor Helmut Neunzert.
Neunzert, to his room, asked him a few questions.
He asked this department wanted to introduce
M.Tech. in industrial mathematics, what is your opinion?
His beautiful way he talked mathematics,
industrial mathematics, mathematic in the Department of Mathematics,
oh, it is so nice.
Oh, ok. Just a few 1 or 2 that is what
Professor Natarajan told and it was approved.
Oh great. We started with 9 students.
Yeah, now. And here one thing we introduced
what is quite brand new, nowhere it was done, the seminar aspect.
Yeah, modelling workshop.
Workshop. Yeah. Modelling
workshop. Yeah, still it is going
mathematical modelling workshop. Modelling workshop,
weekly ones. Rarely,
yeah, we saw the problem. That is something brand new.
From the scratch to the model to the computing,
today it it has gone to that. And that is where the industry also
gave their problems for us to discuss it. Yes, yes, yes.
Still it is going on? Yes,
very we have a. The workshop.
very good connection and still modelling workshop is
very you know. Going that.
One component in.
And I must appreciate you.
Oh, that is your. After afterwards you have taken care of it.
Now, I understand it has gone to a very good level.
Yeah, we have lot of memorandum of understanding with
some of the top universities and we are working on a. And sponsored.
Exchange, student exchange programme.
Now, we have sponsors from DAAD.
Accha. And also we have good sponsor from Erasmus.
European Union where some every semester till 2021.
Every year 5 students of our end, they can go to
to spend one semester in in University of Kaiserslautern. German University.
Then, similarly the students from Germany
they come here for a semester. So,
anyway the main thing is you are the person
with your team at that time,
you started, you thought about it and you started this programme.
Confidence was somewhere else. Because we have seen that you are the
real, you know your foresee the importance of this particular programme.
So, I must really appreciate you for such good ideas.
One simple incidence I will tell you.
Please sir. During my headship you know the computers?
When was the the your? 92 to 95. 92 to 95, ok.
The computers are very popular during those days you know,
just started becoming popular.
We had no computers in our department.
Yes, yes. No computer.
And we requested our deputy director, Professor Muthukrishnan,
sir we do not have any computer department,
can you help us to have some computers in the department?
We want to have a lab.
He told what means computers.
Anyway, I will see he told.
Then, he gave us after repairing few old computers.
Ok. Repaired.
And he told repairing charges I won’t put on the department.
Ok. I will put in a general way.
You take this. We agreed this
and Professor Raghav Raj was in charge of the computer.
Ok.
That is. Now we have a big lab, M.Tech. lab
even we conduct. So
So, we started that
computer lab with 4 computers. Yeah.
And today of course,
computer is a way of life. Yeah, we have own service on that, yeah.
But I want to ask you one thing just to go back again to
Professor Chandrasekhar the famous the Noble Laureate,
so and he visited IIT Madras and he gave lecture. 87, 87.
Oh, it was 90.
So, you are there during his lecture at CLT
and how was that experience of meeting
this giant? You know Professor Achuthan
was very fond of theoretical physics.
When he heard that Professor Chandrasekhar is visiting the
Department of Physics, he informed all of us, he is coming.
All of us we will go and attend his talk, he is very enthusiastic.
And also just before his arrival to at India,
Chandrasekhar had a heart problem, a setback.
He came here with his wife actually.
First visit to us, Department of Physics here in and
he gave a talk in CLT, we attended it, beautiful.
His body language, modular voice and that
simple smile when he enjoys something telling is something very special.
Oh. His wife was there.
Ok. Lalitha.
His wife was also there sitting in the audience.
We were very fortunate to hear him.
So, so thank you sir for this great time.
And really I went back to you know 1960 68.
I was basically travelling along with you from 65 to till.
In fact, I must thank you to bring in my memory so much,
you know things nostalgic. I thank you very much.
Thank you sir. Thanks.
We thank the IIT Madras to bring both of us together. Yes, sir.
So nice. Thank you sir.
- Contribute
to the Centre -
Monetary
Support - Digital
Material
Mrs. Mahalakshmi Gourishankar and Mrs. Vijayalakshmi Bhaskar in conversation with Sujatha Dube
Good morning, I am Sujatha
from the Development Office at IIT Madras
and I have the great honor
and pleasure this morning of interviewing
Mrs. Gourishankar. Her husband Mr. Gourishankar was
involved with IIT almost from the very beginning,
and his photographs and the memories
of Mrs. Gourishankar are part of IIT's heritage.
I am very happy to have this opportunity.
Good morning Mrs. Gourishankar,
Mrs. Viji, first of all thank you for this opportunity to talk to you.
Yeah. I would like to begin by asking
how did Mr. Gourishankar's association with IIT
and photography...all that began...begin.
Yeah, in 1960, I was away in Delhi, Viji was being on a...[Inaudible Dialogue]
and here, his friend Mr. R Natarajan was the Registrar here.
He said, "Gourishankar, why don't you come and take photos in IIT,
we are just started everything the building and all,
and Professor Sengupto will be very happy to be..."
because Professor Sengupto knew a lot about photography.
So, then in 1960 it started. First student’s associations, taking
the photos of the buildings, and then functions.
And then the convocation came.
So each convocation, he used to be called,
and then he used to cover those photos
that is how the association began, and Professor Ramaswamy
and others, Sampath and NCC leader Colonel Nair.
They all used to call him for the various photos
to be taken in their department.
So it was very little then, it had just shifted from Guindy
and the buildings were all under this thing.
And he used to come and take photos for them.
For the record, as Professor Sengupto said, "Right
from the beginning, to see that the trees are all there,
and the buildings are all coming and we are planting more trees"
and all. And he used to tell Gourishankar, how to take photos.
"Take this from the East, that from the West
and this building", you have to keep on saying right
from the ground this thing...foundation to the full building
that he used to do and all the occasions he used to come.
He was an amateur photographer or a
Yeah. Professional. Professional, ok
He was a professional photographer,
then he used to take industrial photography.
And his hobby was to take photos of the
temples and other monuments
Aand tourist spots in India that was his side,
but the main thing was, he was connect...as an industrial photographer.
He was taking photos for Guindy Engineering
and the the Guindy Machine Tools or the various companies
and industries in Madras, and also in Bangalore.
Ok. So, that is how he got connect to IIT.
IIT is one of the place he used to come and take photos.
How did his interest in photography begin?
Photography. He was always interested in photography.
Taking photos and he had a camera.
His father was a good photographer. Ok.
Even though there was no electricity in home
when he was married and came,
his father used to do developing at home.
Having the lights and all.
And he still had those red lights and all that you know.
My mother-in-law used to help my father-in-law.
And so, Gourishankar got interested in photography by his father,
because he used to take a lot of photos with his [Inaudible] camera
which he and his youngest sister Dr C. Minakshi.
Was a historian doing research work.
Under Professor Nilakanta Sastri.
So, my father-in-law used to go along with her to take photos
of all the thing, and till she received her Ph. D.,
he used to help her a lot with all the photos. Ok.
So, my husband was introduced in that way.
And when...I got married he bought his first Rolleiflex.
And he was having a very good hobby as a photographer.
And then geological survey...though he was interested in
geology a lot, he found that he could not...
the six months away from there, my mother-in-law was ill.
And he used to stay in camps and shift every ten days.
Then he resigned, and took up photography as a profession.
Ok. Till then it was a hobby.
Ok. In 1958 - '59 as he took it...the photography,
he started with IIT
that is how...in for...and he read about all photography.
He learned from every photographer. Right
from all the great famous photographers, and all their books
that is how he developed his knowledge about photography.
Do you know about his relationship with other famous photographers?
Yes. In
Yeah, in Madras.
All the photographers knew him.
And anyone in any interview,
They will say, "Do you know Mr. Gourishankar professional one?"
They all used to stand up.
Yes, you know its the (in Tamil) for our profession (in Tamil) an honour.
(In Tamil) after doing MA Geology, he's coming and doing what a photo...and he never stopped
taking its a perfect picture, that is what.
So all the studios and other people would come with to him.
Saying we couldn't get this photo will you please...
He...two or three days he will do.
And he will give them a very good picture,
and they will come and tell me,
"Mahalakshmi, I don't know, we couldn't get the photo
anywhere even G. K. Vale and others they could not do it.
And Gourishankar has taken a perfect picture."
So, that is how he learnt his photography, and to do difficult pictures.
How to tackle them and all. Right.
Even for IIT, there were many difficult pictures, he used to do them all.
That is how he learned photography.
And all the studios and other photographers
used to come home. They were all very good friends.
Ok. Just for learning.
For doubts, or for getting his comments
about their photos they all used to come.
We had very good relation with the...
Who were the other photographers ma, like Dr.
M. Krishnan, (in Tamil) and others like him...
His mentors and all. Yes.
M. Krishnan was his mentor.
He is a naturalist, and a photographer.
And he is very knowledgeable about photography
and he got fellowship Jawaharlal Fellowship and all.
Padma Shri and all.
He was a very good adviser for him
for any in...this thing concerned with photo...
And as he used to do still photography for his cousin.
R. N. Nagarajarao and other still photographers
[Inaudible] so, many people they all used to come
and he used to learn from them the still photography
this thing and the studios,
whenever they found any difficulty in any photos
or anything they used to.
Vaman Brothers, Madras Photo Store, G. K. Vale [incoherent]
They were all they...are very good friend
and we used to know them very well. Ok.
And we used to buy all the chemicals,
because everything was done at home.
All the developed...everything wow.
We had developed the dark room, and all the chemicals bought
and everything, those chemicals this thing also
people used to come. I have Krishnan's letters
and all, where he used to say, 'For this developer, for this stoning, for this...'
All the chemicals and all, they have learnt about so many other things
apart from photography, because they had to tackle different
Right. photos at different times, nature photography
and forest photography was M. Krishnan's thing. Ok.
So he learnt about that.
And all the...taking pictures of the statues
and taking pictures of the...each department here,
that was a real thing, some of them he had to bring out
they used to bring it out to the sunlight,
some of the...for...this thing he used to take home
and take...they all very well cooperated.
The buildings were just coming up. Yes.
Yeah that time.
They very well cooperated.
And the...the perfect background,
the perfect this thing, and the perfect camera.
He used to...and take the perfect picture. And
till he got the enlargement correct,
He never stopped. The negatives were prepared very well,
and then when the printing was done
the first picture, "No this can come better."
That is how he got the perfectionist title in photography.
Have you accompanied him on these photo shoots In IIT? Yes.
Everywhere everywhere. What what was IIT like in those days?
I just remembered 1961.
She was a baby.
We went to Professor Sengupto's house
the Directors Bungalow was very different then.
Now it is very different, and he used to come for all the functions.
Any function in IIT,
he used to come. She was a baby then,
few months old, but we bring her along.
And then when the...Viji was baby and Jayan, my son was born,
and they had school, I couldn't accompany him everywhere.
And there was always an assistant. Ok.
So he used to come
only for important occasion like convocation all, I used to come.
Or for any alumni this thing if they invited me
Rathindra Nath Roy this thing.
(In Tamil) What was Rathindra Nath Roy's friend's name?
They were all my alumni people.
They used to come, and when they invited we used to come
and see that plays dramas, everything. That
we enjoyed, inter-college plays and all. Everything
he will come...photography. Was that in OAT, was OAT there
In those days? OAT was...
After it came...afterwards there was no OAT before.
ok. After that only it came.
Everything came later it was
just plain jungle in '60-'61.
I remember '62,
it started. Professor Sengupto when he working,
and this thing...Professor Sengupto and Natarajan’s farewell...
everything we used to come when there was an occasion.
Otherwise, I never came to IIT very often
because Gourishankar always came with his assistant. Ok ok.
They used to to take photos I only helped him at home,
complete...apart from being a wife I was helping him in photography
in every way when he was doing development
and printing. Taking photos he used to come.
Developing printing I used to.
You used to Help him a lot
and that is how I knew about...
So that must have been very interesting for you to
learn...lot to... Very very interesting.
So, many people came.
They want to learn photography.
And some people who came, "Gourishankar
will you teach photography"...it can't be learnt in one day.
And he will advise them not to take up professional, leaving aside
other job because photography wasn't very well known those days.
As I said, as librarian and a photographer,
came up now, very very well.
Now they are all in very bigger.
after it became a library issue thing, with it...internet and all
and photography with the latest. Correct.
Those days it was not very well known. Ok.
Was he involved...I have heard that
he was involved with Campastimes did he used to write for...?
Yes, yes he was there proofreading in,
as a Roy Rathindra Nath Roy used to say,
"You will advise us at the batch...this thing...what used to come first
and whats the coming behind and what will come there."
And...the...give them all the advice about this thing.
Same thing ICC started and they published a thing,
he took photographs in all the departments.
And he found to his amazement that each department
didn't know what the other was doing.
He used to really complain to them that.
And then they came to know,
about the other, Gourishankar taught us,
see this is already there in the other department.
And when this the book was published I forget the name, ICC book...
they had a copy, but and then they run short that we gave it to him
and we had all the department photos in that
when it was started that's what...consultancy centre was started.
And then he used to help a lot.
Same way when German Consulate and this thing IIT and other people.
Had an exhibition here,
He was there throughout helping them.
Decide the space, arrange it, all that because
he had a good idea about the consistency, he was a very good artist.
Very good artist, that helped him a lot, to get the medal.
I think I had yes... German professors you...wanted blow ups
of the labs. Ok.
Because they developed the labs
Yes. You know.
In the institute, in the workshops. Et cetera.
So that...is he started doing 40 by 30 inches 60 by 40 inches you know.
And do you have those pictures?
The Heritage Centre if...
Has those pictures? Yes, they...
Mostly 40 By 30. ICC.
24 by 20, very few 60 by 40. Yeah.
And that is very different to a normal picture development? Yeah.
Yes You have to mount a enlarger. To still be clear when.
Yes. It is so, big.
You have to mount a enlarger on those...this thing loft. Loft.
And have the big trees huge.
Oh oh yeah, to...ok. Yes.
With a wooden this thing.
And the plastic sheet over it, we had...60 by 40 was very difficult.
The enlarger was up, and...was down
and three rooms were taken on for dark room. Yeah.
And all those pictures the German consulates only encouraged him
to do all the big pictures. All the German professors here Dr Hans Wagner,
Doctor Hans Wagner, Doctor...they all wanted him to do those.
Ok. Pictures for their record, to put up in the labs...the wall.
So, those pictures they took them? Are they still...? Yeah
exhibition took it...exhibition pictures were all here the German Consulate...[Indistinct Dialogue]
They they were different I think. (In Hindi) Oh, achcha
So. It might be with the German Consulate.
Probably. Ok.
Yes. Because the Heritage Centre's always looking for...I think...
Old I'll see...
pictures. old pictures with IIT photos (In Tamil) if it is there
(In Tamil) Please look if it is there. Photos. Yes.
They are all there. Yes.
It would be
Paper...yeah. Wonderful for them to
Yes. Have to.
Paper used to come in rolls,
and we used to cut and print them, I will find it when...[Overlapping Conversation]
Please, Ok ok.
For convocation also. (In Tamil) Yes.
He did with a lot of involvement you know. Yes.
He would attend the
rehearsals also. Ok, to plan the best way of...
[Indistinct Dialogue]
And then Jalakanteshwara...no rain
It was always July July always yes
So, he always used to come, three days rehearsal.
Who is coming, what all, and he used to enjoy hearing them talk and all.
Professor...Doctor J. R. D. Tata, and C. V. Raman
and Radhakrishnan...they all...all the dignitaries were here.
And some of them had visited IIT already.
All of them used to be there and the conversation and all,
and he loved the convocation...this thing very much, meeting people and all.
He came for the rehearsals
to see what angle would be best for each shot. Ok.
See he was very wiry and physically very fit.
And because this work demands that he did a lot of physical work.
Yes, yes yes. So he would climb very risky heights.
Oh my. Very true
Just so, that he could get a
Get the best
shot Oh my
from there you know. Even for building,
he used to go to the opposite side
and take the view from a very very high angle.
So, Professor Sengupto asked, "How did you take...
this should have been a very tall..." No no he climbed up
and took the photo..."Wasn't there a tree?"
He immediately said, "Wasn't there a tree?"
"Yeah, I boarded the tree and went to the other...
you know another thing...terrace." And all this thing,
they were planning, as I said, for three or four times
he used to rehearse and then come and take the photo.
Because he was such a perfectionist.
Yeah. Very very.
If he wanted a shot, he would
That yes.
Do anything to get it, even at
Yeah. risk of his own falling.
Yes, and the way they used, you know, it was always a
north-facing or south-facing...that thing, roofs.
He used to...Sengupto used to tell him, "Take it from this side."
Also his geologist training,
Right. He was very good at...he had a very good sense of direction.
Yes. And very good sense of lighting.
He would know which month of the year, what angle the light would fall, and
how it would get reflected and Wow.
What day...what hour of the day would be best for a certain shot.
And he used to see the clouds, Yeah.
Wonderful background, and then only he will take it...
as he says, lighting should be correct, which angle is correct,
and what height to go to, to take the photos.
Has he written about his experiences as a photographer?
No I don't think...
it would have so, nice to oh ok. He he did not have the time,
because he was doing it for a living, you see,
so, he had to support a family and so, his way of working
was actually not very sustainable,
because he would always be looking for the perfect print.
And so, the number of assignments that he could accept during the...any year,
was limited by how perfectly those photos Because a lot of
time was spent on ok, ok. Yeah
So that way he had very little time between assignments,
because they were always lined up. Yes.
People were always asking why havent you started our work yet. Ok. Oh my
You know and he kept saying, "I haven't..."
Because of his reputation, so...
Because of his very obsessive...
this preoccupation with that perfect picture.
He was very...
Even if he gave 50 pictures, each one of them have to be... Yeah wow.
And he asked her to do the rinsing
and the glazing, you know the...it had to be glazed in those days. Correct.
Because only she could do it perfectly.
He...he couldn't trust the assistant
with it, the assistant used to do all the other work.
Ok.
But he knew that she would do the rinsing very sincerely,
and not take shortcuts.
So that the picture would turn out perfectly. Yes.
It will go yellow for... Oh yes.
This is... The developing the last one is hypo.
Hypo has to be removed, otherwise the pictures will not be perfectly...
They will go yellow.
They will go yellow. They will go yellow not now,
but you know now if they are
still black and white it shows that...he didn't.
Yeah, I know usually they go...they go brown Yes.
when they get spots and so, many yeah. yeah
Old pictures. Even after so many years it is still...
It has to be washed seven times,
Wow. only then the hypo is removed.
Like that there used to be, and then, when he used to take the picture,
and printing and glazing needs to be done,
it has to be perfect, that is it.
And when someone came to take..."Gourishankar,
I want this photo taken of this machine,"
then he will take the picture and give it to them
and they will say, "We will come to him every time
because, we didn't even have a write up,
we just send this photo and we get all the... orders.
from abroad." Yeah.
And just the picture, and the company's name behind,
and we didn't give a write up or go to advertising agency and do anything,
because your picture speaks everything.
And they get all the order and one...
Yes, correct.
once he brought, and we have...he had an exhibition in Alliance Francaise.
Who is an...we can't go, we have an exhib...I will come later
when do you finish and then three months later
he came, brought the machine, took the photo and went.
And for that, he had to have a background
he had to have some...he'll buy small stones, small marbles
and other granite in a...and have a background
correct thing for the measure, and they used to be really perfect
and that is why they waited.
He...I told you his hobby was taking temple photograph and all,
so all those pictures were blown up
and put in an exhibition in Alliance,
and that was a very...famous one, Mister Harinarayana from...
curator of the Madras Museum came and inaugurated. [Inaudible Speech]
Yeah yeah yeah. You can see that, and also
No he is he had friends among the historians Yeah.
and archaeologists.
Yeah yeah. Because his aunt was the first
Very good.
Woman Ph. D. from Madras University.
Doctor C. Minakshi was his father’s younger sister. Ok.
That is how I said his father did all Right.
photography for her and Ok.
So for her thesis,
he remembers that his father used to do a lot of To do a lot
photography That is how he got it.
Yes. So are these pictures still in the Madras Museum?
Yes, I have yes. Those temple pictures.
Museum. I have all the picture,
Madras Museum returned it after the
exhibition was over. Ok ok.
I have all the pictures, these exhibition pictures,
large size as well as small size. Ok.
In August they wanted...Madras Day comes in August
Yes Madras week. So they said,
"You bring along Gourishankar's photographs, we'll display it,
because all the large size pictures are there, exhibition
pictures, some of them people bought
and took away, others are with us.
So this year there might be an exhibition
in...along with Madras week, very
nice Because the photos are all arranged, they have to be cleaned.
So July-August I'll do that and present it. Lakshmi...[Inaudible Dialogue]
[Inaudible Dialogue]
Ok. And.
Ok ok. So this is how the machine photography took on.
Everywhere, all the Guindy people
and other companies all over Madras and Bangalore,
they used to take photographs, bring the machine...
and Richardson and Cruddas was a very good...very good with that thing.
Yeah one's company
A company. Ok.
Which...which he did all pictures. Factories.
Then he used to go all over South India,
and anywhere...photographs
and what they did was, they brought home
all the things he couldn't take photos there...there it was at home. Ok.
In case you take photos and they take that.
The equipment and all Yeah.
that they bring it home.
Yes. Ok.
And also other architects.
Chitale, and other architect.
Whenever they had a good building, they used to come
ask, "Mister Gourishankar, you take all the photos."
Yeah. So, inside, outside, shot perfect
So Madras history, old...old building. Mrs. Vijayalakshmi Bhaskar: Yeah yeah.
Wow.
Chitale used to say, "I can't get any good picture like Gourishankar."
But sometimes they would lose patience,
because you couldn't get him to click, unless, he vis...
what he visualized came in the Yes
exposure. That was an...you know this indoor [Inaudible Dialogue]
He will not waste even a single exposure.
They'll say, "Sir, just take two or three we will see what comes," but he said, "No."
"I will take only one picture."
He was very very stubborn about that
He was so angry when...
[Inaudible]...Ooty. He wouldn't take a picture he says
He says, "I won't take this picture
because I know it won't come...come out well."
And they hence told me,
"It won't be Gourishankars picture, so, that is it madam."
He said, "You ask...you take it yourself, ask someone
else to take it, don't ask me to click from my camera." So...
There was a Central Photography Section set up
here, was he involved with... Yes, yes. Ok
From the beginning it must have...
There very much...and when that was...all the usual
photographs went to that photography department.
Only German professors and other faculty members
who wanted some machine picture which they wanted...there Kuberan or Kumar... (In Tamil) What is his name?
Kubendran. Kubendran.
Kubendran used to take all the photos
and everything, others Gourishankar used to come.
He was a regular Institute photographer. Ok ok.
But anything outside
of the routine he used to ask my father.
After the photography department came,
the regular photos were all done by him, by the department.
But they'd still call him, like you said, for events
or special...yeah ok.
Convocation, they would call him everytime. Ok. Yes.
I mean the other photographers would also be taking
pictures. Right ok.
But they wanted better a coverage,
smaller set of pictures. Ok.
Yes yes. And he would give them, you know these albums
that you see. Yes yes.
And he will never take more, they will say 100 pictures,
no 30 or 40, or whatever the occasion demands, Exactly.
Yeah only that photos he will take.
He says "For this occasion...." The others will come, "No, we want more photos."
"I know, you can inform any other photographer,
he will take hundred times this..." Not take more than this.
He was very definite about how he would. Mrs. Vijayalakshmi Bhaskar: He was very definite, his cousins...[Indistinct Dialogue]
I want your pictures...[Indistinct Dialogue]
He took only 30. Yeah.
That is all, he...whatever the occasion demands, only those
photographs he'll take...nothing extra
30 exposures That is why,
thirty pictures in one album that is it. Yeah.
That is why, in the convocation you read that this thing...complete
this thing...what all the programme
and where all he has to take photos, the President Prize,
the...Prize, the Director Prize or whatever
and he will take the photos of those students and give it correctly
and exactly...number not one extra picture.
One audience, that is all, no more.
He would have the list
He wouldn't budge,
but the few...he had a good sense of humour, you know.
So once I think person called...some student called Vannangamudi,
Ok. who won a price.
Some Governor's Medal...whatever.
And then they announced it, and
you know he was bending his head to
you know, greet the person...President
or someone who was giving him the prize,
and then two people were talking to each other
saying that, "See his name is Vannangamudi, but he is actually
bending his head", and so, he took he took a picture of that.
Because he felt that you know It is yeah.
it was good. So the...only in those instances he would budge from his
From his list How...
This [Indistinct Dialogue]
Yeah, I remember him narrating it to his... Ok.
So then as he grew older, he is...did he...
Yes. till what age did he go on taking pictures?
1995 I think we finished with IIT, slowly he...
But till '95. Gradually he stopped taking photos,
only a few...this thing we used to come, Professor [Inaudible] and.
But at that age also he used to... He was able to do Yes yes
He had a lot of willpower. Ok.
He functioned on willpower.
In all his effort...photography, he has all the things.
But he would work 65 hours Wow.
Continuously. non-stop, because because, he...the moment he
took a break, the chemicals would go waste,
and he would have to mix a new set of chemicals.
So in order to exhaust the chemicals,
He would go on working. He would work anything between 40 hours
and 65 hours. Yes, yes.
Three hours...we...three days we kept awake, Yeah.
And then we came here with the exhibition picture.
They said, "Please put up Mister Gourishankar, you only know."
Fourth day we were here and then we went to sleep. Yeah.
Three days continuously
we were working. Oh my
No sleep.
Complete...no sleep.
Because the German Consulate wanted the exhibition in the IIT
We never knew before, that was a last minute...this thing.
And we came, chose a place, brought all the photos.
Three days without sleeping, you were working. Yes, three days!
Three days fully we never had slept. Never slept, that was the maximum
I think. Fourth day, we put up the exhibition, and went home and slept.
Wonderful, the...he had stamina for...the photography and other things.
He would begin by cleaning the dark room every time he started.
Yes and he was perfect at home ok. Mamata Dash: Gourishankar Collection, all Gourishankar Collection. Mamata Dash: You can just scroll
He was perfect at home. Can you...can you see? You can move it so, she can. [Indistinct Chatter]
Collection.
(In Tamil) No, she's showing his (Gourishankar's) collection
Yes, yes there it is.
Yeah yeah he used to call it penguin,
Professor Sengupto said all the penguins are...
Sujatha Dube: Because of that gown and... [Indistinct Chatter] Mamata Dash: This I think all albums, all the photos are there.
Sujatha Dube: Oh, that's so nice Sports pictures,
he used to take all those sports day pictures... Yeah
And first one again... [Indistinct Dialogue]
Mamata Dash: You want to see?
Sujatha Dube: No no, let her
Mamata Dash: These are all his collections.
Sujatha Dube: Ok, I can look at it later, yeah. Yeah.
Sujatha Dube: They are digitizing everything, and putting it
Yes yes. Sujatha Dube: up on the Heritage Centre's
Sujatha Dube: website... Bhaskar told me...
even the ones I brought today,
those have to be digitized. Yes yes.
Important occasions and other things, they has to be digitized.
He said all the negatives have to be digitized.
I brought them in four or five lots. Ok.
Because I found them in various places,
and we had shifted house.
So, the...today I got 34 pictures.
[Background Chatter] Wow.
The set of picture and I brought them. Yeah.
And it was so nice to see all the the album within the archives
Yeah. there...is that...
Because the Centre is now become...really developing well and...
Indira Gandhi came,
that was so much, this thing...the security and all. Security.
And three days he used to come, and get all the detail,
because he said, "On that day, we won't be having...
that will be very crowded and everything.
Extra care we took on that time,
and same way, other visitors also.
Anyone from Germany came.
In '60, '61, '62, many people, (In Tamil) From the President, all the important people from Germany came
I will give them...all the negatives are there Ok ok.
They were all so pleased, you know he...they come to the
carpentry section, "Shall I plane?" "Oh, yes!"
Professor Sengupto will stand, and he will plane,
and he will take a picture.
That is how it was, it was all very very...friendly type their this thing,
those days.
I think all of us...all students have this... So many...so many jokes he had about
so many humorous instances, along with those people.
Everybody who studied here, has great memories of the workshops.
Yeah yes. Workshop...[Indaudible Dialogue]
[Indaudible Dialogue]
Vijayalakshmi. See...
Mamata Dash: This is Indira Gandhi convocation
I forget the name of the workshop,
Mister Gourishankar, they are coming and telling me,
"How can you have Sarswathi puja, it is secular here,
we dont have any...alright...we will call...worship of the...tools.
We will call it only worship of the tools
and we are worshipping the tools that is all."
No pooja nothing, see, there...you know...you
have to live with...your tools are everything in workshop. Yes, yes.
This is how he used to explain everything in that.
This seems is that Indira Gandhi (In Tamil) The pictures from convocation for which she came
Yes, 9th September, you know it was changed.
Saturday, the thing we had to...
Yes, this was the thing.
Wonderful, they were all there. Great pictures
All the Directors, right from Sengupto,
they were all there in the...and the school, Vanavani School.
And it was born. Mamata Dash: Yes yes, Vanavani creation day.
Right from the day it was born, we were there.
You know we knew all the...this thing
because he studied in Loyola College, and the mentor here,
the advisor here, was his professor from Loyola and the...the...the principal.
They were here. (In Tamil) What was that lady's name, ma...Professor...? [Indistinct Dialogue] She had come after Vanavani was started.
When was Vanavani started? (In Tamil) That was also in '60s...?
'65.
'65, four or five...
Jebamalai... Jebamalai Peters
She was the first...
[Indistinct Chatter] Just...I remember, we were there, right from the Vanavani started
there, taking pictures there...pictures of Vanavani also
(In Tamil) When did K. V. come about? Kendriya Vidyalaya...also around?
Kendriya Vidyalaya, no.
Ok later...Vanavani was first
Very much later.
Mamata Dash: '64. Around the same time.
Ok. (In Tamil) After '85-'86, we had stopped...so many, coming here.
Only important occasions, we used to come.
Actually you know from the negatives,
That he worked here till '95, because very rare occasion
he used to come there. (In Tamil) In '60 he started...
But just then, (In Tamil) He shifted here from Guindy
(In Tamil) After starting then...I think in 1995 something,
but very gradually we stopped this thing...yeah this thing.
Did he gradually...(In Tamil) Generally photography, because of age or?
(In Tamil) He left photography Ok.
But...
Vijayalakshmi Bhaskar: Because the kind of photography he did was very strenuous.
And yes, they used to ask him to take photograph of books.
That was the...[Indistinct Dialogue]
An American Professor, Santa Barbara,
when he came here and...he did his research and everything.
He took a lot of photos for him.
And then he used to give all the write-up,
and then for any information, there he was, with all the details.
Yes.
Sometimes IIT students used to come, I remember,
tha...they...I think maybe from the Photo Club or something,
they used to come to and spend, you know evening and night Right.
watching him work and, you know
getting this thing... Learning...learning
from him, ok.
That so many people did.
My friends, Yeah.
relatives, and unknown people.
They all used to come.
And he'd welcome everyone. Yes yes.
and so many people learned photography
and printing, development, printing and all...he was there.
Tea was on the tap in our house, tea, snacks or biscuits or bananas or...
Somebody...(In Tamil) someone will always be coming Mungfali (groundnut),
whatever, because she was so busy
and, you know
she...she would just make sure there is a stock of everything.
So, my father would drink lot of tea in between his works.
So whoever was there, there was a round of tea
Always had tea...and whoever worked there, the carpenter,
the assistants, and so many other people used to...painters
and the negative photographers,
assistant photographers...they were all there, together they all treat...
he'd treat them exactly equal to him, there was no difference for anybody.
All had khaana (food) together, all had...[Indistinct Dialogue]
And he would eat with them, not with us.
And when there was an exhibition or an important occasion
in IIT or anything, everybody will step in, they will do any work.
They will take over those work, and this one will take...
and then the album...then the frames and all finished,
everyone will be helping everyone,
and then it will be finished on time.
Great teamwork.
Yes. Yes.
He inspired the
people like that. Yes like that.
Because he himself was working very very hard.
Right yeah. Yeah. So, you know they said, why not...
So he would lead by example.
And he encouraged them to take on,
in life.
Right.
You know you can't remain an assistant you can't remain this way.
They encouraged him to swallow their own profession
and how they use...best to...there was one Chellamuthu, he went to his village,
and he thus benefited by visiting...and even when Gourishankar died,
the way he helped me, I could not have managed otherwise,
and in later days, he helped them a lot financially, everybody,
and even today when he ask his assistant to bring up anything,
"Oh, we will do it." And the...then the people thank me and I said,
"Don't thank me, you thank Gourishankar."
But he...because he is still rubbing...that rubbing on that...
this thing, "We will do anything for Gourishankar",
"We will do anything for uncle, we will do anything for him."
Because that's the thing they created for him. Any problem anyone had,
he used to go and solve them, or put them onto people, you...those who get it solved.
That way he helped everybody, he had an empathy for everyone,
and that still continues, even after so many years,
people just tell me, "Gourishankar (In Tamil) immediately, he will do anything...Chittappa (uncle) [Indistinct Dialogue]
and because relatives, friends, everybody will help. Photography and...generallly.
They all have such great memories. Generally generally generally, he had.
Our house itself was a 200 year old house.
It was just rebuilt once I think.
It was a street house in Nungambakkam,
where the front entrance was on one street, and the back...
back door was.
(In Tamil) Like an Agraharam
Agraharam house. With cowshed, with car garage,
With tulasi maadam, with a second kitchen for functions.
I didn't know there were such houses in Chennai
Court yard (In Tamil) I have seen it somewhere in Trivandrum Yes.
Courtyard and huge...big corridor,
and hall, and this thing...upstairs there was a big hall,
and we just created...painted...[Overlapping Conversation]
It's a heritage building.
Yeah yeah. (In Tamil) Now? Now it is gone,
we sold it long ago.
And then, background he used to paint one wall at the background
and all the photography was done there,
and the huge house, I think had all the things.
But later on he took nature photography.
And one wall he refused to let it be painted,
because he said it looks good as it is.
Because it shouldn't be even.
And then he took on photography, he used to do outside only.
In nature...nature light, everyone.
My mama’s (uncle's) daughter came, said, "Please take a photo."
He used to take the photo in the background...in the...behind
in a, near the all the palm trees and coconut trees.
That photo came out so well, they wrote back saying, "We are going
and looking at the photo every minute, I think that
Its so nice I have...never nobody has taken such picture of ours."
See, very high ceiling. Right.
So that is why he could do the enlargements
with the enlarger mounted on the loft Ok ok.
The negative used to stand...withstand all the big fine enlargement. Ok.
And he took a photo of Madurai temple,
he climbed one gopuram,
Oh my! He wasn't allowed, he took permission,
and then took the photo of southern gopuram
Nobody had that view at that height.
Who climbs up a gopuram? Yeah,
his friend from geological survey had gone with him.
"Ma, was holding to his shirt,
it was just sheer drop."
And he would take on taking photos and wait for the clouds,
and the picture had won so, many prizes
and Karumuttu Thiagarajan Chettiar from Madurai,
he took a large size enlargement of it, painted,
still there with him, Ramaswami chittappa (paternal uncle),
took it along and it is still there with him, he said, "I never knew
negative could stand this enlargement." It was perfect, clear
picture of that size, 60 by 40. Wow.
60 inches and That angle is impossible to get, unless
you take it from one gopuram,
and you know there are these holes in the gopurams,
he got to the edge of...inner edge of the holes Oh my.
so that you don't see the window like appearance. Yes.
So it looks as if you are viewing the other gopuram
from somewhere in mid-air.
This wasn't seen at all, the gopuram wasn't seen it...
It would be fantastic view.
Lying on his tummy for
hours, and his friend was holding onto...
On the gopuram...(In Tamil) Oh my!
Geological survey friend came and saidt, "We are doing some digging
and...at Thiruvannamalai, please come along."
He took photographs of the temple,
and the rice planting there, and also they were digging and
geological work. All three came,
but geological work of course, we printed and gave it to the department.
But this rice planting and Thiruvannamalai temple pictures
still, they are there, and all large size, because for the exhibition,
and small size, they have...exhibition pictures...small size pictures [Indistinct Dialogue]
I see. just 34 pictures (In Tamil) he kept in exhibition.
You should hold an exhibition
of his pictures.
Yes, they are having in...I think August.
We never got along to...he never believed in
Having a... having an exhibition, or in submitting his photos for competitions.
Ok. If someone called him and exhibited a photo,
and said, "This is very nice," it's ok.
But that is the only kind of recognition
that he...otherwise he will not go into...
And he doesn't take.
Just the picture was enough for him, getting the perfect picture. Yeah, yeah
that was enough. Yeah, any wedding, any birthday, any occasion,
presented pictures. So everyone was happy,
"Oh, there is Gourishankar's photo, oh there is..."
Professor Thomas from Alliance Française "That is your visiting card."
There everyone had pictures,
presented by Gourishankar.
Various pictures from various...statues and all.
So they all had pictures, because he used to present them right
and left to everybody.
Anyone who valued his work,
They got the picture...some.
If you can, you should write about all those times,
it will be very interest...with his pictures, make a beautiful book, I think.
If you, if you have the time. Yeah yeah.
Because you were there throughout with him, you saw everything.
Exactly.
She worked with him. You worked with him, you know all the details.
[Indistinct Dialogue] Kalyan...Kalyan Sundaram from State Bank of India
he was a very [Indistinct Dialogue]
So Appa (father)...[Indistinct Dialogue]
And he wrote such a...[Indistinct Dialogue]...Appa (father) replied, "Kalyan,
you have helped me so much, I stood in front of the mirror I find a halo in front of me."
"You praise me so much, you deserve all the praise."
I'll come and meet Professor...[Indistinct Dialogue]
His fellow students,
like this person from Geological Survey.
From from his M. A. Geology class, and from Geological Survey,
they used to have a lot of regard for him,
because even the 10 years or so, that he spent in GSI,
He...his mapping was so perfect,
that even to this day, they dont have to alter it,
even by an inch.
And now Jayanth showed me (In Tamil) in is there in the internet, you put Geological Survey,
and there is Gourishankar. Yeah.
With all these surveys done in various front, from Bihar and Madras.
Wow.
Sunderbans, everywhere he has...
Yeah, when he resigned, Professor...[Overlapping Conversation]
(In Tamil) I though he would give a survey...report and go.
He has given perfect reports of all the places,
he used to enjoy writing the reports.
Wonderful, and the survey they used to do, wonderful in each quartz,
in each stone, and he had a lovely rockery at home,
in the garden he had a huge big house I told you with a [Indistinct Dialogue]
The background...backyard was a very huge place,
he had a beautiful rockery, and inside the house, almirahs
contained all the rocks, and his friends used to tell
they bring the hammer, they bring the rock, Gouri is the best person to trim.
He will trim each one beautifully.
You know they get the rock from the...this thing,
Yeah. then it has to be trimmed in a nice way.
Correct. To show the correct...
of the rock, and his friends used to have just fingertips about all
the rocks, Professor Gopalan and all.
And they used to come, and we had a beautiful almirah fullt,
and a rockery in the garden of the geological...
that helped him a lot in photography.
GSI, geology...
and I asked him, "If that was geology and that started...
and you took it because you liked, if there was...otherwise
what would you have taken?" "I would have taken archaeology
or architecture." Both of them weren't there then...
He loved buildings and history
Because he used to paint a lot. Oh ok.
I got pictures of his painting of his professor,
He draws and paints my sister-in-law's picture.
He draws and paints beautifully.
She got it, painting and all. Ok.
(In Tamil) He knows it well.
So... He used to write also, he was a very
good writer.
[Indistinct Dialogue]
He used to...he used to write in
Times of India, Sujatha Dube: Ok.
those days. Sujatha Dube: Ok.
Sujatha Dube: So do you have those?
Anywhere we went he used to write articles. Sujatha Dube: Ok.
I got all his articles, yes they were...they were printed in paper and magazines,
Times of India, Illustrated Weekly, all had his articles, yes. Mamata Dash: He has written one article in...
I have seen the article this one,
the 'Dear oh Dear', 'Oh Dear, Deer!' yes I have this...is very nice.
He used to enjoy reading Campastimes, Ok.
so he contributed this
Very nice, this is very well...funny...funnily written.
And anywhere he went, he took photographs,
he will come home, write an article and attach the photo
and send it to the paper, and there it was.
This is very interesting, he talks about about how he needed to buy
camouflage with green hat...
Such preparation na, before.
And all the archaeology people used to come home
because of Dr. C. Minakshi is out there.
They used to tell Gourishankar, "Go here, take photos, this will be nice." [Indistinct Dialogue]
Go to this place, that place, he went all over,
took photos, and he used to write article and send it to paper.
The photographs are still there, and the articles are also
there, cuttings, I have kept them.
That is very nice.
All the cutting...and he also stored scrapbook.
Cuttings of all interesting articles, not a scrapbook exactly,
they were collection of very good pictures, and same way, arts.
Any picture, any painting, any art, he used to collect, a big scrapbook of.
So he had many interests...
He was interested in so many things, not only photography.
To keep up with them. Because he got very tied up with being a With the...
professional photographer. Ok.
When he was a geologist,
he could Yes.
But this was much more time consuming, And and any
art exhibitions, he will be there.
In this thing...the Lalit Kala Akademi...
Akademi, wherever he used to...in the museum anywhere,
any exhibition he will be there,
and he used to be judge in the tourist department.
He used to call him for being a judge, Mahabalipuram and other places.
Where the tourist guides were given an examination, oral examination.
He used to go along and be a judge there,
because he used to ask the correct question as...[Inaudible Dialogue]
tourist department visiting will attend them,
and correctly he said, "These students answer very well."
In this thing.
Mister M. Krishnan used to come and watch him work,
and he used to go to...we were family friends. Ok.
He would visit him,
you know as he was developing his wildlife pictures, Right.
He also had very nice documents very nice...
he did all his photography work himself, apart from that
he was a writer. M. Krishnan wrote in 'Statesman,'
and any...they had...we had very good conversation.
"Gourishankar you told me this today,
I must write it in my next article."
And there in the next 'Statesman' it will be there.
That is why the conversation we had, and...the and how much we learnt,
that was the thing...how much we learnt from all
these various friends and acquaintances, is remarkable.
And they also said, "We also learnt equally from you."
Both of them, he did...when he was doing his photography,
they were both attending to my grandmother,
Yes. who was a bedridden patient.
Oh ok.
Arthritis patient.
So, on the one hand, they would do the photography,
And take...that's also very time... continuously take care of...
see, in those days no attenders...
He looked after his mother very well.
So, he had to do much of it yourself, (In Tamil) Isn't it? Yes.
Both of them looked after my grandmother,
because she needed handling.
She was...she was
completely bedridden. Poor...
1953 I got married,
'55 she fell ill, till 1967...she died...for 12 years,
you took care of her. Yes.
In with all the... With all this
Viji, Viji baby... And with children and...
Only Jayam was born later on, my son was born after she died.
But Viji was a baby, and my photography, and my mother-in-law there.
Oh my, three full time jobs
Yes. Yes.
All in the same house, you know
We had very good servants, very good cook,
and people to help, anytime, because we were there in that house,
right from 1807, Gourishankar’s great great grandfather
had bought the house from the East India Company.
We had all those papers.
And, right from that time, we were there in Nungambakam
in that house, which was demolished and built again and again,
but the later house was so beautiful, everyone else
said, "Gourishankar please will this house to me!"
Unfortunately, it was co-owned by many other people,
so it had to be sold
It had to be sold
He couldn't afford to buy it by himself. Yes.
It must have cost. He was sentimentally very attached to it.
But it was one of those...
He must have grown up there then, if his great grand....born and grown...
Born and grown up.
You have any other question that you want to ask?
No I don't have any that's it.
Is there anything else you would like to say or add?
I [don't think so. Yeah.
Thank you again, this was wonderful talking to... Thank you very much.
Thank you.
I the recalled all the nostalgic memory and this thing about Gourishankar.
I hope you have you can write about it,
I am sure it would be a great book. Yeah yeah.
Thank you.
Thank you, thank you.
- Contribute
to the Centre -
Monetary
Support - Digital
Material
Prof. R. Srinivasan in conversation with Prof. M.S. Ramachandra Rao
Welcome to the oral history interview
organized by the Heritage Centre of IIT Madras.
I am M. S. Ramachandra Rao from the Department of Physics.
I am extremely happy, and also I feel privileged to interview
a living legend Professor R. Srinivasan;
Ramaswamy Srinivasan whom we all dearly call as Professor R.S.
Professor R. S. served IIT Madras from
1962 to 1990 for about 3 decades,
and during the time of his service, he graduated about
25 Ph.D. students and published about 250 research papers.
He…al…he was also the Dean of Academic Research,
Dean of Student Affairs and he also held the position of
Deputy Director of IIT Madras.
More than anything, Professor R. S. has been
an extraordinary teacher and a wonderful
and meticulous experimentalist.
In fact, he changed over from theory to experiment.
He was initially working on the Theory of Lattice Dynamics,
and then…he became…all in all a
true low temperature experimental physicist.
He was not only instrumental in IIT Madras
in establishing a state of the art low temperature facility,
first of its kind in the entire country.
This used to be a central facility for
low temperature measurements,
way back in the mid-80s, during the ITC boom.
Later, in the later part of his career,
he was asked to establish 3 national centres of
great importance, under the name
‘Inter-University Consortium’ in Bombay, Indore and Kolkata.
I mean, these centres are so important now for people
working in universities and…and…and to have access to
you know, high-end facilities for their research.
He is an epitome of…a great academician,
he is an embodiment of a great academician who should be
emulated by one and all.
At the age of 87, he is 2 years older than my father,
he still sits and you know, plays with physics instruments.
His mission is to fabricate low cost physics equipment
and he has succeeded in that endeavour in a very big way.
He’s been training teachers by way of refresher courses...
About 2000 teachers were trained by him, and he had
conducted 85 refresher courses, and we are going to
hear all about it from him very soon.
He is defined as a…a…a…a true karma yogi.
We are happy to have you here, sir.
Thank you for coming over for this interview.
And I also would like to welcome Mrs. Radha Srinivasan
who these days prefers to travel along with him
wherever he goes and also Professor Swamy
and my colleague Professor V. Sankaranarayanan
from Low Temperatures Physics Lab.
So, Professor R. S., I would like to ask you to tell us about
your schooling and college days before joining IIT Madras.
Yeah, see my schooling from first form to fifth
form was mostly done in Andhra Pradesh because
my father was a PWD engineer in the pre-independence
days Madras Presidency.
He was transferred from place to place.
So I did first form to fifth form in Proddatur in Kadapa District,
Madanapalle and Bellary.
And then I did sixth form in Ramakrishna School
in Chennai, and did my intermediate in Loyola College,
and my B.Sc. honours in Madras Christian College in Tambaram.
Then, I joined the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
in 1951 for my Ph.D.
And in those days, IISC was not giving degrees,
so we had to register with our parent universities,
in my case Madras University.
I got my Ph.D. in 1957,
then continued as a postdoctoral fellow till ‘62 in IISc Bangalore.
‘62 I joined IIT Madras.
And can you tell us your experience at IIT Madras
and about the Physics Department.
I think Physics Department just then started, with
Professor Ramaswamy heading
the department, and about your colleagues.
Yeah…see when I joined in 1962,
the Physics Department was already established by Professor C. Ramasastry.
He had appointed a few faculty members and
started the teaching programmes for the B.Tech. students.
But in those days, there was only one building;
the Building Sciences Building.
And all departments were housed there,
so lectures were conducted there.
About a year later… ‘63,
the Humanities Sciences Building came into
existence and we moved into the Humanities Sciences Building.
Professor Ramasastry also negotiated with the GTZ,
the German Technical Aid Organization for 8 to 7
laboratories in the Physics Department.
So the credit for starting the Physics Department
goes to Professor Ramasastry.
When I joined, there were already a few faculty members.
I think Professor Sobhanadri was there.
There was Dr. Ramanamurthi,
Dr. Sivaramakrishnan, S. B. S. Sastry,
Y. V. G. S. Murthi…these people were there.
Then, I was working in theory at that time,
and there was Dr. Ramji Rao who worked
with me on…for his Ph.D. on Lattice Dynamics.
Then during ‘65 to ‘67,
I went as a Visiting Research Associate to the
Material Science Laboratory in Penn State University
where I worked on theories of non-linear elastic constants,
third order elastic constants,
how to calculate them from
fundamental forces between the atoms.
So I published several papers there,
came back and continued this work till ‘71.
My colleagues in the Physics Department
were very good, and we had
excellent relations among the colleagues.
Professor V. Balakrishnan joined later,
but I have a very high regard for
Professor V. Balakrishnan because he is an exceptionally good
theoretical physicist and a very good teacher.
In fact, we were involved in modifying the
structure of Physics teaching for the B.Tech. students.
It was changed from 5 semesters to 3 semesters,
and Professor V. Balakrishnan made the curriculum
for three semesters and I taught with him…the B.Tech. students,
I also taught M.Sc. students.
I taught theory, all topics like Mathematical Physics,
Classical Mechanic, Statistical Mechanics, Quantum Mechanic,
Solid-state Physics to the M.Sc. students.
Then I started lectures and Cryogenics as an
elective, and we built the Low Temperature Lab.
This is how it happened.
Very nice, sir.
So, you have been working on a
Lattice Dynamics…Theory of Lattice Dynamics,
but then you changed over to Experimental
Low Temperature Physics, which is of course,
a very important area, and this has…
your venturing into that field in one way
has helped, you know, people like us
who work in Experimental Low Temperature.
See, actually for my Ph.D., I did experimental work
and Thermal Expansion down to 90k.
To explain the results, I had to learn theory.
So I read all theory papers and max bonds theory and Lattice Dynamic,
and then, we did a lot of work on Lattice Dynamics,
and one thing led to the other;
from Lattice Dynamics, I went to anharmonic property of crystals,
then non-linear elasticity and so on.
In 1971, the Low Temperature Laboratory was
started with German aid in the Physics Department.
And Professor A. Ramachandran who was
the Director at that time, he put me in charge of the
Low Temperature Lab, because he knew me back
from IISc days, and he knew
I had worked in Low Temperatures at that time.
But I had not worked in Liquid Helium.
Work at Liquid Helium is totally
different from work at Liquid Nitrogen.
And so I had to first learn how to operate and
maintain the helium plant,
because if the helium plant goes bad,
we have to wait for technicians to come from US,
and that may take several months or years.
So we had to see that we maintain the equipment,
so that the liquefier ran all the time.
And then I had to start experiments to train the
students in low temperatures and then start research.
But changeover was not difficult, because
I have…I am a self-made physicist because when
we studied B.Sc. honours, we were not taught much of
Mathematical Physics or Theoretical Physics.
So I had to learn all of this by myself.
But I found that if you read the papers or the books,
and read them 2-3 times, then you understand
you can do any type of Physics, whether
it is experimental or theoretical.
So this is how I started;
I changed from theory to experiment.
So would you…we…we would like to hear from you
more about Low Temperature Physics Lab,
how it was established, and about your students
Prof. R. Srinivasan: Yes. Prof. M. S. Ramachandra Rao: who worked on many topics including
High Temperature Superconductivity?
Yeah, you see, the Low Temperature Lab
was aided by the German government and
there was a professor from the German side
who interacted with me and this was
Professor Klipping who had a lot of experience in
international collaboration.
Professor Klipping realized, that though
I was a theoretical physicist,
I understood how to do Low Temperature experiment.
So he supported me very strongly.
When the Low Temperature Lab was established,
the German government gave us some minimum
equipment to do a few experiments,
but we didn’t have money to purchase
additional equipment like temperature controllers,
vacuum pumps, and so on.
Professor Ramachandran,
Director was kind enough to sanction 10,000 rupees per year
as grant for Low Temperatures,
but with this 10,000 rupees, I could import 6
cylinders of helium gas from UK.
I had no money for buying equipment.
Professor Klipping realized this, and he told me that
in their lab they are throwing off old
measuring equipment and replacing them by new ones
or they’re throwing off equipment which doesn’t work
because it was much cheaper to buy new equipment
in Germany than to repair old equipment.
He said he will send all this to me, and if
I can salvage some of the equipment and repair the
equipment I can use it in the development of my lab.
This is how we develop the Low Temperature Lab
in a very low cost way.
And I am always conscious that any development in
India must be low cost development because
there are many universities which don’t get
enough funds for their research purposes.
So we started like this.
I went twice to Germany for three months each time
to work in Professor Klipping’s lab,
but I understood Low Temperature Physics,
so started our own activities.
When we had problems, we repaired our
equipment ourselves, and we were…our low temperature
liquefiers were working all the times, whereas,
in other institutions in India, the breakdown time was large.
Well, my liquefier was the smallest liquefier in India;
2 litres of liquid helium with liquid nitrogen pre-cooling,
but it was working.
And TIFR wanted to send some equipment in a balloon
for astronomical purposes, and the
detector had to be cooled with liquid helium.
Their machine was not working,
so they asked me whether I could make 100 litres of
liquid helium and supply it to them.
To make 100 litres, I had to run my liquefier nonstop for four days.
But I told them, “You bring the gas, and you bring your helium container,
I will make the liquid helium and give it to you.”
And I and my colleague Venugopal we slept in the lab
for four nights because we didn’t know whether
there would be power interruptions which were
frequent in those times.
Luckily, the four days there was no power interruption.
We made the 100 litres liquid helium gave it to them.
And that is why the reputation of my lab grew.
People realized that here was one lab where the liquefiers
was working all the time and you can depend on
them to supply liquid helium.
Then I developed low temperature experiments.
I got projects and the DST made me Chairman of the
Programme Advisory Committee in cryogenic for 10 years,
to develop large scale cryogenic applications, engineering applications.
So we gave projects to IIT Bombay,
IISc Bangalore, IIT Kharagpur,
where there was an advanced cryogenic centre
to develop large scale cryogenic engineering equipment.
IIT Bombay made a Stirling cycle liquid nitrogen plant,
completely indigenously.
IIT…IISc made 100 litre liquid helium demand.
So like this, large scale cryogenics work came up,
but I want to say that our development of Low Temperature Laboratory
was closely bound with the Material Science Centre of IIT…IIT Madras.
I can talk about this if you want.
See, when we started doing research, Professor G. V. Subba Rao
was appointed Head of the Material Science Centre.
He was an exceptionally good material scientist.
Made very good materials.
And I developed very close collaboration with Professor G. V. Subba Rao.
So he made several phase, superconducting materials,
magnetic pyrochlore materials and
later high temperature superconducting materials,
very high quality materials which he will characterize
using X-ray diffraction and other facilities,
and then we take the materials and
do all low temperature measurements.
This collaboration was essential for the development of
research in the Low Temperature Lab.
And I am greatly beholden to
Professor G. V. Subba Rao for his help.
He and his students…Professor M. S. R. Rao was there at that time,
Varadaraju was there, and our Sankaranarayanan
did work and several face superconductors…
Vasudev Rao worked on
thermoelectric properties of these materials,
Ranganathan worked on magnetic properties of pyrochlore,
and several other of my students worked on
high temperature superconductors.
And this collaboration with
Materials Research Lab is continuing even today, after 40 years.
This is an example of how a very good collaboration between
two different departments could develop in IIT.
And I am greatly beholden…you must show the
photograph of Professor G. V. Subba Rao.
I learnt he passed away last year and I felt very sad.
He was a very good friend and very good collaborator for me.
Thank you, sir.
So it’s…it’s really good to know how IIT Madras
was a nodal point in…in developing the low temperature facilities
that have become so important for…for…for establishing similar
facilities all over the country.
I need to mention a few words about Professor Klipping.
You see Professor Klipping had in his laboratory, people from
China, Japan, Soviet Union countries, USA and India.
And in India, through me, he got to know people in IISc Bangalore,
IIT Bombay, IIT Kharagpur,
and the German collaboration in cryogenics expanded to these laboratories.
And Professor Klipping played a very important role
in the development of cryogenics in India.
He got the Mendelson award in 2003
which was given in China to him.
And during the award lecture, he showed my photograph
and he mentioned among all the international collaboration,
the collaboration with India worked
best which I started in IIT with Srinivasan.
So, it was…he was a very good personal friend
of mine and he liked India so much,
after he came to this country, he helped
several institutions in India to grow.
I thought I should mention this because Professor Klipping…
you see there were many German professors who helped IIT,
but Professor Klipping’s help extended
beyond IIT to other institutions in India.
Very good to know all this, sir, yes.
Prof. C. S. Swamy: Which institution in India had the liquid helium facility
Prof. C. S. Swamy: first? Prof. Srinivasan: Yes, the first institution to have liquid helium
facility was National Physical Laboratory,
then TIFR. But the National Physical Laboratory,
there was a person from UK who was
heading the low temperature division.
After he went away, the liquefiers were not functioning.
TIFR also, they had problems, and that is how they
came to me to supply 100 litres
of liquid helium for their experiment.
So now, beyond academics, you also served in
several administrative posts as Dean of Student
Welfare and Dean of Academic Research
and also you were the Deputy Director.
Can you share us your experiences in those positions?
In Low Temperatures?
Yeah.
As Dean of Academic…
see, I didn’t do much administration as Dean of Academic Research,
Dean of Student Affairs and Deputy Director.
I used to go in the afternoon…1 or 2 hours
to the administrative office, complete my administration,
I took my full teaching load during that time.
I used to come in the night to talk to the research students.
But as Dean of Research, there were two contributions
I made which were quite important:
one was the gas supply to various departments broke down
completely for 3 months, and chemistry suffered very badly
because their research depends on the availability of high purity gases.
So they made a complaint to Professor Indiresan
that the stores section and the Indian oxygen
they were having some problem and this disrupted
the gas supply, and they were badly affected.
So Indiresan told me, “You look into the problem.”
And I restored gas supply in 15 days
by changing the method of procurement and distribution.
I set up a Central Gas Supply Unit,
I was…I went there and along with my colleagues
pulled out all the old cylinders in the store,
we got the gases…I…if they were not used fully, we said
return the cylinder, we put it in our cylinder,
returned the cylinders to Asiatic Oxygen.
So we built up a supply of gas.
If anyone wants gas urgently, we will be able to
supply from what we had, and we also saw that
every week or every 15 days, gas will be procured,
it will be distributed to all departments.
Old cylinders will be collected, gas will be shared,
empty cylinders will be returned.
This solved the problem immediately
and I think this unit is still
Prof. Srinivasan: working Prof. Rao: Is still continuing, yes.
Then, I set up the Extra Mural Lectures.
Professor Indiresan felt that students of IIT should
not only be exposed to engineering and science,
they should also be exposed to lectures about art,
medicine, journalism and so on.
So he told me I must organize Extra Mural Lectures every
Wednesday between 4 and 5,
by eminent people in different areas.
And I must do it every week.
So, we did that, and this became very popular.
In fact, Extra Mural Lectures, the Central Lecture
Theatre will be filled up half an hour before the
lecture, and I bring the speaker, there will be no
place for me to sit. It became very popular.
We got Arthur Clarke,
we got Justice V. R. Krishna Iyer to talk about jurisprudence,
Rashmi Mayur to talk about environment,
Khushwant Singh to talk about journalism,
Iravatham Mahadevan to talk about numismatic,
Padma Subrahmanyam dance, Veena Balachander music.
So I made a list of speakers, and saw to it every
Wednesday there was…Extra Mural Lecture.
And after my time, it was handed over to the
students and I learnt that the 100th Extra Mural Lecture was conducted.
Now in a very big…you know the Student Affairs Centre;
a very big auditorium is there, it was conducted a few years back.
But they are not doing it every Wednesday,
I was doing it religiously every Wednesday.
I enjoyed doing this.
These are the two things that…
I…major contributions I had made during my…
(Inaudible off-screen voice)
You see, before I became the Dean,
when I was in the Physics Department,
Professor Ramachandran gave me the responsibility of
setting up the Central Glass Blowing Unit.
I was doing theory, I didn’t know anything about glass blowing,
but I talked to the glass blowers,
find out how much of gas is required,
I procured the machinery, and in 3 months,
this Central Glass Blowing Section became operational.
It helped the Chemistry, Chemical Engineering Department.
And later my lab, because all glass levers
we got made in this Central Glass Blowing Lab.
I think it is still
Prof. Rao: Still.
functioning well.
So these are the 3 major contributions I did.
Thank you very much, sir.
So the Central Glass Blowing Section
and the central gas distribution was still functional.
Of course, these two are indispensable
for experimental research groups in…in…in the Institute.
Prof. Rao: So we are thankful to you for starting off…these units. Prof. Srinivasan: That’s ok
It was my job…you see,
if there’s a problem, I want to solve it quickly
without violating any administrative procedures.
So I called a meeting of the accounts officer,
audit officer, talked to them about the method of
pom…payment to the Asiatic Oxygen, the type of agreement.
After achieving a consensus, I put this into practice.
So, there were no administrative problems.
Otherwise we get bogged down by a lot of procedural problems.
So that I avoided.
So that way, I think it is good for an academician
to take up administrative posts sometimes.
You know, to solve such important issues at the Institute level.
Prof. Swamy:What is your colab…what was your collaboration with IGCAR?
Prof. Rao: IGCAR collaboration. Prof. Srinivasan: See, IG…
See, I have very good friends with
Department of Atomic Energy people.
I worked in Lattice Dynamics.
They also worked on Experimental Lattice Dynamics,
very good collaboration.
So when IGCAR was started,
the Director C. V. Sundaram, he wanted to have collaboration with
IIT Madras in general,
but they wanted to start a low temperature lab there.
They didn’t have the facility,
so two of their scientists worked in my lab for 2 to 3 years.
Used our facilities to do their experiments and then
when they set up the lab, they had the necessary
expertise to run the machines and set up the lab.
So this cooperation with IGCAR proved
useful when I went to IUC Indore,
so I had collaboration with IGCAR in…they were setting up…
it was not from IIT, they were setting up a
Low Energy Accelerator, and they
wanted students to help them.
And I provided small fellowship to students from universities,
they provided accommodation,
and with this help of students,
they set up the Low Energy Accelerator.
The students gained very good hands-on experience,
they got their Ph.D.. Many of them who didn’t come
through GATE, who came from very poor families
are now occupying very top positions abroad
there and the editorial boards of several journals.
So this was a very good collaboration I had with IGCAR.
So now, after you…you…you left IIT, you are
given this big responsibility of establishing the
the National Centre, you know,
Yes.
Inter-University Consortium.
See, I was offered the position of Director of
what is now called UGC-DAE Consortium for Scientific Research.
You see, the UGC set up two other Inter University Centres,
one was IUCAA; astronomy and
astrophysics headed by Professor Narlikar at that time.
The other was an Accelerator Centre in Delhi,
where they had a pelletron.
This was the third centre.
The idea was, The Department of Atomic Energy had
set up very large facility like neutron spectrometers and Dhruva reactor.
They were coming up with synchrotron radiation
facility in CAT Indore and variable energy cyclotron in Calcutta.
So the university scientists should go and use these facilities.
So we needed some interface which will allow
university scientists to access DAE facilities.
In addition, we had to set up some facilities,
so that the university people can characterize their
specimens before taking it to the DAE facility.
If the specimens are not well characterized, results are useless.
So they set up a main centre in Indore with two other centres
in Bombay and Calcutta.
And I was asked to be the Director.
When I went to Indore, there were 6 empty rooms.
So I had to build the 3 centres from scratch.
I realized low temperature experiments are very important for characterization.
So I got a 25 year old nitrogen liquefier which we got
first in our Low Temperature Lab and which was lying idle,
we replaced it with a more modern liquefier.
And I…Professor Klipping was disposing of his old liquid helium machine,
he was getting a new machine,
he said he will give the old machine to me if
I paid for transportation of the machine.
So I got these too.
And I had one person, Ganeshan trained in my lab.
So he set up both these machines.
We produced liquid nitrogen liquid helium in
Devi Ahilya University where our consortium was located
and I set up all low temperature measurement facilities.
And…so that the university people will come and use it.
In 3 years, the IUC…3 centres came up very fast.
When I left, there were about 100 users for our facilities
and users for Dhruva reactor and cyclotron.
We were supposed to build one photoelectron
spectrometer beamline which we built
before Indus One was operational.
So I left, but when Indus One was operational,
our beamline was the first beamline to be installed
and it is still working.
And so today, I made as a Chairman of the Programme
Advisory Committee in Condense Matter Physics,
I made a recommendation, a report to the DST
that they must set up a national centre
for low temperature high magnetic field.
After a discussion which took place in IISc
where all top physicists were there,
I made a detailed estimate of how much it would cost,
what machines should be purchased, what should be the structure.
The DST accepted the report, but I left the IUC.
After that, they set up one facility in IUC Indore,
which will be accessible to all university and another centre
with complementary facility in IISc Bangalore.
This centre is working extremely well,
got an excellent rating in IUC from the DST.
There are 70 users for low tempera…
all types of low temperature measurements you
can do down to 1.8k at up to 16 tesla magnetic field.
So this is acceble…accessible to all university users,
70 users from small universities are using the
low temperature facility.
They are coming out with excellent research
papers in good journals like Physical Review.
All other facilities in Indore, in Bombay, and in Calcutta,
the facilities are being used by 1200 university users every year.
This has become a big success.
But success is not due to me.
It is due to the Directors who succeeded me, they had
a very good vision and they carried forward what I started.
But it is an excellent institution.
Apart from IISc, TIFR it is one institution you have…where
you have excellent facilities for condense matter research.
There are some facilities not available in IISc
and TIFR, they come and use the facilities there.
But you created the nucleation…
It has come up very well.
nucleation centre to grow it in such a big way.
Yeah, it has grown very well.
Then, I retired from IUC Raman Institute in Bangalore, small institute.
They asked me to come as a visiting scientist.
Professor Kumar was the Director.
He wanted to start some new areas;
experimental areas of research and he asked me for suggestions.
I told him we can start work and cold atoms,
where atoms are cooled by lasers
to temperatures of 50 to 100 micro kelvin.
I gave a series of lectures, he got convinced,
he gave seed money,
And Professor Hema Ramachandran built the lab,
I gave her suggestions.
Together we produced a cold cloud
of 50 to 100 micro kelvin of rubidium 87.
Today, it is a very active lab and 3 years ago,
the Bhatnagar Award winner was from that group.
Yes.
So these are two things I did.
I will talk about experimental course.
I would…yeah. We would like to know about
your other role that you got from Academy of
Sciences to establish the…you know the
Prof. Rao: refresher courses which again was a big success. Prof. Srinivasan: Yeah, you see
the Indian Academy of Sciences,
in 1996, they started refresher courses to be
given by fellows of the academy.
2-week courses to update the knowledge of teachers in universities.
These were all theory courses.
In 2001, Professor Mukunda, Chairman of the Science Education Panel
gave me the responsibility of developing
a refresher course in Experimental Physics to improve
lab practice in colleges. Lab practice was in very bad situation.
So I took the help of a young colleague from Goa,
Dr. Priolkar and we initially started in a small way,
we built small electronic circuit using analog
chips, cheap ones for making all measurements.
I learnt electronics at the age of 70 and built these
instruments, and then we developed mechanical items,
and first course was held in Goa in 2001
with about a half a dozen experiments.
We wanted the teachers to wire 3 circuits and take it with them.
They found it very difficult to wire,
they were not used to soldering and so on,
but they did it and they took the wired circuits with them.
They did the experiment.
And because this was course in which they
worked with their hands, there was a lot of enthusiasm.
Prof. Rao: Yeah.
So then, slowly we developed and
we built more and more experiments.
We started with experiments at the B.Sc. level,
then we came to M.Sc. level experiments,
post-M.Sc. level experiments.
By 2010 December,
we had about…we completed 25 courses in different parts of India.
And I found a company in Bangalore to make all the low cost circuits
and equipment to be sold at a price fixed by the academy.
Once the kit came, the demand for the course
grew, and I travelled all over India from Kashmir to Kerala,
Gujarat to Tripura, 9 months to 10 months in a year,
every month for 20 days, I stay at one place, conducted a
refresher course for about 30 teachers,
and then the equipment will be transported to the next place by lorry,
and then I go to the next place, conduct that course,
like this I was doing till 19…2017 February.
I conducted 86 courses.
This was the most popular refresher course.
Experiments went into 150 institutions,
universities, separate institutions, colleges.
Kits were bought by 250 institutions.
Institutions like IIT Madras, IIT Roorkee,
they bought our equipment.
IISER bought our equipment.
I conducted course in IISERs also. Central Universities,
some State University, they have introduced some of the experiments.
Then the academy built a lab for me in Jalahalli,
where they gave me money to buy a thin film unit.
I got a close cycled refrigerator and long term loan from CAT,
where they were developing these refrigerators.
And I do advanced courses and material science in Jalahalli,
because we cannot take these heavy equipment everywhere.
So I developed more advanced circuits,
more advanced experiments.
Total of 55 to 60 experiments I have developed.
In ’87…80…2017 I told them I am 85 years old, travel is very tough for me,
you have to find somebody else to undertake this programme,
and they found Dr. Sundar from
IGCAR Kalpakkam, and he had just retired.
Last one year he has been conducting the courses,
and in July, 100th course will be conducted in Punjab University.
And the president told me, I must bring out the manual
as a book which will be released at the 100th course.
So I prepared I revised the manual, added some appendix to it,
and the book is under publication,
I am correcting the proofs now.
It will be released next month.
So this course came up, was a big success.
Again, you see…my programme succeeded,
but I won’t claim credit for this success.
The only claim I will make is; I take a project,
I put 100 percent effort in it.
But a project I work with, number of colleagues Low Temperature Lab,
I worked with Shankar Narayanan and other students,
they all collaborated with me in developing the Low Temperature Lab.
And Rangarajan was there as a faculty member.
Similarly, in IUC…Professor Siddheshwar Lal
was in charge of administration,
a man who had similar ideas to me,
very quick decision making, very effective.
So we worked together
and his contribution in bringing IUC very great.
Then in Raman Institute, I had colleagues working with me,
academy, I had colleagues working with me.
They all pulled their weight together and that is why
the courses…everything became a success.
So the credit is to be shared by all people…I’ve…
credit doesn’t belong to me.
So what…what…what is your advice to the
younger generation of teachers and researchers?
See, first, I am not such a wise man to give advice.
You, you.
And secondly,
You are a wise man to give…
advice is always sought, but never followed.
So, the only thing I will say is for me, I like to look for
projects which I will enjoy doing and which is
within my ability to do and I succeeded.
This is one way of taking up…any work.
So people have to see…try out whether
this way will work for them.
But there is one thing I have to say.
I believe life is like a relay race. Every generation
runs a part of the relay with the resources available to them,
with their strengths, and with whatever is the social norms,
more values, laws at that time.
So we of the older generation,
we ran the race with whatever resources
were available, whatever wherever chance.
We have handed over the baton to the next generation.
During this time, technological advances have taken place.
They have better resources, better strengths,
social modes have changed, views have changed.
So they will run the race with their resources, their strength,
and their modes, and I think the older generation
must now keep quiet; they should not criticize the younger generation.
They are doing their best.
They will become old,
they will hand over the baton to the next generation.
But the only thing that worries me is, technology is
progressing very, very fast.
But our society is not changing equally fast.
For example, the developments in computer information
technology provide several advantages we…which I
didn’t have 20 years ago.
But it also provides for cyber theft, cybercrimes,
and now society wakes up and it says we must now
make laws to prevent cybercrime.
So society is always one step behind technological advances.
So I don’t know where this will lead.
It may…society may be able to control the advances
so that it is used for good purposes or it may not be able to control.
And what happened to the legendary
Atlantic, may happen to our civilization.
So this is something for concern.
Our society must react to advances in technology equally fast.
This is what I want to say.
So we have two…two questions from Professor Swamy:
one is about back in your IIT days, the visits of Professor Bardeen and
Yeah.
Professor Chandrasekhar.
Professor Bardeen got the Nobel Prize twice.
Once for discovering transistors, and…which revolutionized
semiconductor industry along with Brattain and Shockley.
And the second time, for working out the
theory of superconductivity along with…I forget their name,
two other young people.
Prof. Swamy: Cooper and Schrieffer.
So he came to
Cooper and Schrieffer.
Ah, Schrieffer and Cooper.
So, for 50 years, people didn’t understand how superconductivity arises.
It was Bardeen, Cooper and Schrieffer who provided the first
The BCS.
mechanism to understand how superconductivity arise.
He came to IIT, and he visited our lab also,
gave a talk in the Central Lecture Theatre.
When Nobel laureates come in our field, we feel enthused.
It…it…it gives us a lot…lot more enthusiasm especially works in
superconductivity gives us a lot more enthusiasm to work in the field.
Professor Chandrasekhar is a theoretical astrophysicist.
He had visited IISc when I was a student.
So he visited here.
He was a very good theoretical physicist.
He visited the labs, but his area was totally different from ours, so…
Prof. Swamy: I am asking about the astrophysicist.
Yeah, Chandrasekhar astrophysicist.
So, his area was different.
He has done extraordinarily good work.
He was one of those people for whom the Nobel Prize was delayed.
Prof. Rao: Which part of the…
He was one of those people who will take a problem,
work on it till he completes it to the last INT, then write a book on it,
which will be an authoritative book.
But his work was in an area totally different from ours.
Of course, his work enthused us,
but not to the same extent as Bardeen’s visit.
Can you please tell us about Professor Tatachari?
Yeah, Professor Tatachari was my brother in law.
We were actually Ph.D. students together in IISc.
He worked with Professor G. N. Ramachandran, very brilliant person.
He was not only brilliant in physics, he knew Sanskrit very well,
philosophy very well, he could paint, draw very well,
he could talk authoritatively on art.
Music.
Philosophy and so on.
He went to USA worked in MIT with the Nobel laureate,
then went to Stanford University, and he was working on
Synchrotron Radiation Sources.
So he came to the IIT for 2 years,
and he worked in the Applied Mechanics Department.
At that time, we don’t have synchrotron facility,
so he changed and he worked on
Kirlian photography.
Kirlian photography was that if
you send some high frequency radiation,
you see some halos around the body,
and looking at the strength of the halos,
you can make some…come to some
conclusions about the health of the person.
But one did not know how these photographs arose,
why the high frequency radiation gives the halos.
So when Tatachari came here,
he made systematic investigations on the effect of the
dielectric medium between the high frequency source
and the photographic plate to see what happens to the halos
when you introduce different materials of different dielectric constants.
But this work he did for 2 years,
then he went back and resumed his synchrotron radiation work.
He worked there for another 23 years
and came back to India, to settle in India.
And then he had a bladder problem and he passed away.
But I will say that he was one of the strong influences on my
on me because when I went to IISc, I knew physics,
but I didn’t know anything else.
And I found he was same age as me and his knowledge was so wide.
So I started reading a lot of books and wide…I widened my knowledge.
So he was a great influence on me.
Thank you, sir.
Prof. Swamy: The reason I asked about Professor Tatachari was the Kirlian photography.
Prof. Swamy: Now, there was a lecture given by a neuro-physician
in Chemistry Department somewhere around ‘80s,
he talked about using this radiation, whatever equipment to find out
in Jeeva Samadhis you know, there Jeeva Samadhis all over India.
So he could find out whether the body inside was alive or not.
In fact, he talked about a historical thing
which happened during the First World War.
See, one of the things in the Kirlian photography which
Tatacharya also found was, you take a fresh leaf, you cut it one half,
you remove that one half, put the other half,
you take the photograph, you get the photograph of the full leaf,
the other leaf is not there, but it leaves some imprint.
So how he got that full leaf photograph, he was working on that,
but then he went back.
So he went back to his old work on synchrotron radiation.
Prof. Swamy: In fact, I think he guided one or two students for M.Tech., Applied Mechanics
He worked with the…in the Electrical Engineering Department
Prof. Swamy: Yeah.
using their high frequency…say, setup.
Prof. Swamy: Thank you.
So, Professor R. S. what are your other interests?
See, my other interests
Other than science and that.
See, I like to read a lot of books on…
my interest is in history, especially ancient history,
like Greek history, Roman history, Persian history and so on,
I don’t like to read history as a series of dates and wars.
I want to read about the life of the people,
what were the forces which caused the war or whatever it is.
So, I have read translations, Herodotus.
Yes.
Histories in English translation, Thucydides, Peloponnesian War.
I have read all Greek plays by Euripides,
Sophocles, Aeschylus, Agam…Aristophanes in English,
and I have read Roman history, Tacitus Annals all this I have read.
I like to read psychology, parapsychology,
and psychology I have read Rhine’s book on parapsychology.
I also…I am interested in cricket.
So…I used to play cricket, but I am interested very much in cricket.
When India plays, I watch all the matches even
now, with great interest and enthusiasm.
(Indistinct off-screen voice)
Then, I used to listen to Carnatic music.
Prof. Rao: Carnatic music, okay.
But now I can’t, because my hearing is bad.
Telling stories to grandchildren [laughter].
And then I like to gather small children, and then
when…when I am with children, I become a child.
My imagination soars… I tell them,
I make my own characters and tell them lots of stories.
Yesterday, Professor Manoharan’s daughter, she was
asking me about a story I told her when she was a
small child, about a magician; Egyptian magician whom I named
Go Gapasha who lived for 1000 years ago.
So that story became very famous among
the children in Lake View Road [laughter].
So this is what I do.
So Professor R. S., now one last question,
but it is the most important one.
See
We’d like to know about .
my wife has been a tremendous support to me.
If I had married somebody else then I am sure she
would have divorced me, because I used to spend all the time in the lab.
I will go home at 5 O’clock or 6 O’clock,
have dinner, come back to the lab. Go back at 11.
I never took any interest in household affairs.
My children were all brought up by her, their schooling;
which school they attended, everything was done by her.
I didn’t even know what my bank account was.
She was managing everything.
Left me free to do my work.
She was a very good artist, she was trained in Kalakshetra,
in traditional Tanjore Paintings. She did beaten copper work,
and she will make huge rangoli,
it will take 30 days to make the rangoli,
8 hours a day, but she has done it along with Vasudevan’s wife,
my sister-in-law. So she has her own interest.
So, what she will be doing…her painting, and I do my science.
But we have a very good understanding.
So, our life has been extremely pleasant and
I would not have been able to do any of these things,
but for the support which she extended to me.
She has been tremendous moral and physical support to me.
My children are very much more attached to the
mother than to me because she
looked after them completely, whereas
I was taking care…the lab was my child [laughter].
So I was there in the lab all the time.
I had very good relations with all my students.
See, all of them are occupying top positions now,
but they still have a lot of affection for me and I am very grateful to them.
And I am very grateful to 2 institutions in the country: IISc Bangalore,
which developed my confidence that I can do research on my own,
And IIT Madras, which gave me a chance to grow.
I think the IIT Madras is a first rate institution and
it will grow stronger and stronger in
coming years. That is my wish for IIT Madras.
Ma’am, would you like to say one word about Professor R. S.? No?
I only say that the Physics Department was our
home was…it was to them like another home.
So they…that is why…that is how we had this bonding.
So you had…as he said, two children, and the third child was
Professor R. S. himself, you took care.
Yes, yes, yes [laughter].
Very…nice talk.
Very good bonding we have.
Prof. Swamy: Can I…sorry. Now that you talked about IIT Madras,
Yeah.
Prof. Swamy: you must be knowing that IIT Madras has received the first position.
Yeah, I saw that,
and I am very proud of that.
See, the IIT Madras has grown so much and so well, under…
see after I left, ‘90, the growth is enormous in the IIT Madras.
Prof. Swamy: Sir, I have one small doubt; in the sup…in the Low Temperature
Prof. Swamy: Lab, you said you were working with Professor Subbarao,
Prof. Swamy: what was the highest temperature…
Prof. Swamy: I am sorry for the lowest where you have observed super conductivity?
No, in IIT Madras, we can go down to 1.8 k.
No, he is talking about the…
Highest temperature, oh, you want highest temperature.
Prof. Swamy: No, no, no, I am asking about superconductivity.
Tc, Tc.
Tc. You know, the highest Tc in superconductors is
140 k for mercury compound, thallium compound under pressure.
We didn’t study that compound.
We have studied thallium, barium compound
where the temperature is around 100 k.
Professor R. S, I…I made the mercury compound
You made this, yeah.
which showed a drop at 140 k.
So, about 100 k. I think Sankaranarayan
will remember better than me.
Prof. Swamy: No, just the metallic ones, how much did you go
Prof. Swamy: when you were working with IGCAR and all that?
The conventional one.
You see.
The conventional.
We started with 90 k samples and went up to something like 114 k.
No, sir, the low Tc.
Prof. Swamy: Metal, Metal.
The conventional ones, metal ones.
Yeah, low Tc,
temperatures the maximum low Tc materials,
maximum temperature predicted on
25.
BCS theory will be about 25 to 30 k.
Prof. Swamy: Yeah.
So, when the high Tc came, BCS theory is not complete.
Yeah, yeah.
So there is a new mechanism for high Tc
superconductivity. Nobody knows what the mechanism is till today.
People are working on it, but no final theory has been established.
Prof. Swmay: Now, why I am asking is, Professor Subbarao,
Prof. Swamy: the compounds he was working on,
Prof. Swamy: now, he was originally not working on those compounds.
Prof. Swamy: In fact, he was asking me, “Why don’t you start?”
Prof. Swamy: Because we were working on something like that.
Prof. Swamy: I just want to tell you, that in 1980 itself, we tried to
Prof. Swamy: predict that we have got copper in 3 plus oxidation state,
Prof. Swamy: I could not prove it. So, I just went to Germany,
Prof. Swamy: I asked some…I came back to Professor C. N. R. Rao,
Prof. Swamy: I couldn’t get help from him, but then only one professor;
Prof. Swamy: Professor Hagen Müller.
Prof. Swamy: When I told him, “This is what we were looking for,”
Prof. Swamy: and I told him what the systems were doing,
Prof. Swamy: he just made a remark, “You should have got a Nobel Prize.”
[laughter].
Prof. Swamy: Not, not, that it is a joke.
Prof. Swamy: I wonder why he made that…because now that you tell me
Prof. Swamy: that nobody has understood the mechanism,
Prof. Swamy: so, I can very well see why he must have
Prof. Swamy: told this, because nobody has understood this.
Yeah, the reason is several…see,
it is known, it is not the lattice vibrations
Prof. Swamy: Yeah, yeah.
which caused the pairing of the electrons.
Then they looked for other mechanisms.
Prof. Swamy: Correct.
One is, you see resonating valence bond like in benzene.
So this theory was put forward by Anderson.
There’s another theory; spin fluctuations.
See, the electron has a spin.
It will interact with spin fluctuation that may be responsible.
It looks like spin fluctuation theory may be the correct one,
but there is no final agreement on the…what is the correct theory so far.
Prof. Swamy: And there is no chance of getting a room temperature, so.
Yeah.
I think there is still chance.
Two high Tc materials,
but see when high Tc was discovered, people thought we
can make room temperature superconductor.
If we know how high Tc materials…what is the mechanism,
we may be able to make room temperature, we don’t know still.
Prof. Swamy: Thank you, sir.
Thank you, Professor R. S. for this
Thank you.
wonderful enlightening discussion.
I really appreciate your time.
Thank you, very much. Namaste, ma’am.
- Contribute
to the Centre -
Monetary
Support - Digital
Material
Prof. V.G.K. Murti and Prof. Sankaran in conversation with Prof. V. Jagadeesh Kumar
My name is Jagadeesh Kumar;
I am a professor in the department of Electrical Engineering.
I have with me Professor Sankaran
who is also professor of electrical engineering retired and
Professor V G K Murti again former Professor at IIT Madras;
he also occupied the positions of
head of the department of electrical engineering
and Dean Academic Research at IIT Madras.
Sir, you are the second faculty to join electrical engineering?
No, not really when I joined, there were already three others.
Three.
Professor Venkata Rao head of the department
and Ramaswami joined a few months earlier, and Dravid, N. V. Dravid.
Oh.
Associate Lecturer. We were then he became a lecturer.
Incidentally he is the uncle of our Rahul Dravid.
Oh.
It can help there.
And also Thathachar.
Thathachar joined little later.
Yes, little later.
At the time when I joined these three were there already.
Thathachar, Professor Sampath and T.A.R Bhat joined a few months later.
So, at that time the department was functioning out of BSB.
Yeah, that was the first year
when the Institute faculty moved into the campus.
First 2 years I think they were operating from the AC College and elsewhere.
And so that was the 61, 62 is the first academic year
when the whole Institute moved into the campus.
So, I joined in August,
the session already commenced in July or near about.
Therefore, I joined in the first year on the campus,
but a few months later.
And hostels were functioning, but there are no staff quarters.
As a matter of fact when I….
It is called Officers Hostel. Taramani House is called Officers Hostel.
Oh yeah that was built much later.
That was built much later.
The first day I came to join the Institute,
I remember that very vividly now.
It was all a jungle and then I started at the gate
and said how far is the building?
He said go it will be within walking distance
that man that watchman told me, then I started walking.
It was all jungle it was a very very narrow kaccha road.
Hardly I could see, no I did not see anybody for a long time
and then here and there are some NBCC
National Building Construction Company
they some of those workers who are I met them
and they also said you go in the same direction it was clearer 2 miles way.
I thought I lost my way, but finally,
I found something here some life here.
And then everybody was talking about BSB,
BSB all the departments were in BSB.
Some workshops buildings were there
and they are not really produced for workshop
maybe carpentry and some things like that,
which are needed for the first two years.
The store section, the engineering section,
various other departments were out in the workshop.
But all the academic departments were functioning from the BSB.
So, when was ESB actually built?
When we were in BSB the building construction began
and we moved into the ESB in 1962,
but the building was being built all around us.
Oh.
So, we were in the ground floor,
but we saw the scaffolding in all sides
and then upper floors were being built and so on.
But the Southern side that particular wing was more or less complete.
So, that was in 1962.
Padmanabha Iyer was the person who was ruling the place?
Padmanabha Iyer yes, Padmanabha Iyer came from Indian Institute of Science.
He is the foreman.
So, he set up most of the lab in the beginning.
Sir, how many German professors were there in the
electrical department at that time?
At that time there were none.
There were none.
65 Meyer.
You know what the first German professor was
I think was Zeinecke. Zeinecke.
Yes but
but yeah.
Zeinecke was not a professor at that time.
He joined associate professor I think yeah.
right.
Probably so, Probably so.
Meyer was the joined as professor.
Meyer came later.
Both of them were from Braunschweig?
Meyer was from Braunschweig, Zeinecke I do not know.
Zeinecke was from somewhere in the middle of Germany. Not Braunschweig.
Yeah, he should know better.
No, no.
And Professor Beslich.
Beslich from communication department, he came later.
And then Holtz.
Sir.
Holtz. Holtz.
Holtz. Holtz. H O L T Z.
And Rutloh. Rutloh is it?
Rutloh.
Rutloh for high voltage?
High voltage.
High voltage. Rutloh.
And they came, but they were all there for a brief period,
the persons who are there for a long time were Zeinecke,
Professor Meyer and Holtz.
Holtz.
Holtz. And there were also some technicians
who came and setup the Electronics Centre, Central Electronic Centre.
Do you remember the name, the names of who setup the CEC?
Racop. Racop is one.
Racop yes.
Racop is one, but Racop was preceded by some gentleman
which starts with B. I forget the name.
What is his name?
Somebody came for high voltage.
Rutloh.
high voltage.
Rutloh high voltage?
No, no, but the Central Electronic Centre was started by somebody else,
Rutloh came later. I mean, Racop came later. There was also a D. V. Bop.
Bop came here much later for the television lab.
He came in late 70s or early 80s. Bop.
one person who used to have up to this neck and wear full sleeves.
Maybe Bop.
I thought he was Bop maybe.
Bop. Maybe Bop.
Sir, the first batch of students, what was the strength at that time?
Electrical or whole put together?
Electrical.
40?
Around 40 or so.
But, yeah we used to call them high current and high low current.
Heavy current, light current.
Heavy current and light current.
Light current. That was the designation.
It was called in Germany in Braunschweig and ‘Schwachstrom’.
That is why it is called heavy current and light current.
I think 15 in each if I remember, right.
Sir?
15 each perhaps in the first batch.
Electrical itself?
No?
What this the doubt?
The first batch of Electrical.
In the first batch the numbers of students is only 20 in each.
Total.
In each batch there are 20.
In each batch there are 20. Ok.
Each batch 20.
Sir, how many?
100.
20 each. 20 each. And..
Srinivasan.
Yeah.
Whom we called ‘Computer Srinivasan’ was mechanical department right?
Yes.
He was mechanical department.
Yeah, only thing is I had lot of contact with the mechanical students
because I taught Electrical Technology for them.
Ok.
And for the first batch of electricals, I did teach at few courses,
but not such intimate contact with them.
The curriculum was already in place when you joined? Or..
Yeah, it was, I think before, well before I joined,
I think there was a committee that was appointed by Professor Sengupto.
Madras Committee.
No, the Curriculum Committee.
And they drafted the curriculum and syllabus that was,
at that time, it was for 5 years, a 5 year program.
And the first two years they had a lot of workshop
and that was a specialty which we used to claim that
IIT Madras people are very skilled with their hands
they have two years of intensive workshop.
And the specialization began only in the 3rd year onwards.
It was quite interesting; that means, the first two years,
I think, one week they did workshop and one week they had the academic program.
Ok.
So, one week right from morning till evening they used to do workshop.
For a complete day?
Complete day.
Sir, when did research actually start?
Well, I mean these things we cannot have.
sharp boundaries cannot be put in, but as far as I, engineering is concerned.
Broadly, I think during Professor Sengupto’s time
most of the effort went into the building of the laboratory,
establishment of labs and building the infrastructure.
And I think he did a very remarkable job.
Active research, I think, began with Professor Ramachandran’s time.
That was.. he came around 1969 or about 70.
67 end I thought.
67. 67. End of 67.
Because first the infrastructure was developed
and Ramachandran also introduced some curricular reforms.
Like he did away with the 1 year long courses
and introduced a semester pattern.
And he also introduced the.
Electives he introduced or not?
Electives yeah. That is the 5 year semester pattern came along with electives.
And it is he who also introduced the MS course by research.
That was his innovation because coming from IAST
where they had the degree with that background
he felt that is a good thing to do and yeah
Professor Ramachandran’s tenure I think is the beginning of research.
So, the Ph.D. as a course started at that time?
Yeah, Ph.D. was there even earlier I think,
even in the science department there were Ph.D.s.
Ph.D. program as such was on the cards right,
even during Prof. Sengupto’s time.
As a matter of fact, the first two Ph.D.s
from our Electrical Engineering department
I think they finished it during Professor Sengupto’s time.
B Ramaswamy and Seshadri.
Seshadri.
Seshadri. Seshadri. So faculty could register.
Both are your students?
No no no no no.
Professor Ramaswamy is the supervisor of Professor Venkata Rao.
And.
Seshadri?
Seshadri allowed me to put my name as his supervisor
and did the all the work himself.
Sir, when did you joined IIT Madras?
63 July 18th.
Yeah. 63 I can vouch for but July 18th I do not know maybe.
But I got leave in the morning from Guindy College
and joined in the afternoon at IIT,
because at that time in IIT if you get a seat,
if you get a placement,
if you get a position it was supposed to be very high in those days.
Sir initially your positions were associate lecturer?
Yeah, the..
Lecturer, senior lecturer.
No.
No senior lecture.
They had the associate lecturer that is the first faculty position
and then the lecturer then assistant professor and professor.
Associate professor also was not there at that time.
Introduced somebody if yeah,
because there were some people
whom they did not want to give ‘lecturer’ post or ‘professor’ post to.
So, they made them associate professors.
Yes sir? Is it true? No words.
Naturally if you have both of these,
both positions open those who cannot…
Yes, those who are not…
Who apply for professor’s post and then do not get it.
Yes exactly.
Yeah. So Professor and myself where two people..
Professor Venugopal, I think, was the first
associate professor for the whole institute,
I think, if I remember right.
So, initially there were only electrical, civil and mechanical.
Metallurgy.
Oh, metallurgy was also there.
Metallurgy, chemical.
Started started.
Yes started yes.
Started from there.
Yeah.
So, aerospace and…
Yeah that started a little later. Yeah.
EGR was the first metallurgy professor?
EGR yes was the first.
TH Ramachandran was in the department as Assistant Professor
as the head of the department. Professor EGR came
and he was the became the head of the department.
Thank you.
Associate Professors he was there
with Professor Venugopal and Professor Achuthan.
Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes.
And you were also made members of the senate.
That is right.Yeah right.
Yeah that is why you are the first member
of the senate to complete 25 years.
Remember 6, 35 years of senate membership you only did it.
Yeah, I think it is Professor Ramachandran who..
When he became the Director
he said you should hire Associate Professors also.
Also
could be members of the senate that is right that is right
And surprisingly I remember one incident.
Three of us were called to the Paris Corner,
Paris House Paris Corner their office
H.V.R. Iengar was the Chairman of the board.
So, we were the process of being upgraded to
upgraded to Professor’s post
we all went Achuthan, myself and Venugopal
in suit and tie and so on.
The receptionist thought
we were also Selection Committee Members said,
“Please go in sir”.
Then we had to tell her that
we are not Selection Committee Members, we are candidates.
So, then their tone completely changed and they said,
“Please take your seat there”.
And when we entered the room the Selection Committee
had already met and Professor H.V.R. Iengar
is a very nice gentleman.
He said, “Gentleman we have decided to make you professors
now the interview starts.
So, please be at ease, please be at ease let us discuss something.
What do you think of industry and institute collaboration.”?
So we, the industry and institute collaboration started in 1993
No.
In formal way.
Not in 1993, it was.
RGM became the Dean
Yeah, they used to have deans for various divisions.
Professor Incharge, yeah.
He was the Dean, industrial consultancy and continuing education,
I think, both of them were combined,
I think, Professor RGM was in charge
and then in evolving plans for the Institute
they thought there was a need for a trust-industry collaboration
and the Germans promised lot of aid for that,
including one professor deputed for the purpose to stay
and setup this Centre.
That was in 1970.
2.
77 or there about.
ICSR in 73; 73 ICSR.
73 or 70.
73 it started, Wagner you know.
Wagner, yeah, Wagner came and at that time I was put as in charge,
Professor in-charge of industrial consultancy.
So, I worked with Wagner for a couple of years and.
There was one gentleman called Wagener.
Who is that?
Wagener.
Wagner.
There was Wagner separate and Wagener there were two.
Oh ok ok ok.
Don’t remember.
Yeah.
It entered into my mind.
Yeah.
Most likely I’m wrong.
So, that was when the ICSR was set up.
It was called not ICSR, that time it used to be called
ICC Industrial Consultancy Center.
And later on it became ICSR
because the sponsor research became a very heavy component
of the total consultancy activities.
So, that was when it was a renamed as ICSR.
The ICC used to function from the top floor of the BSB.
When the first computer center started.
Yes.
Did we have courses in the electrical engineering
curriculum teaching computers to the students
or did we introduce them much later?
I think there were hardly any at that time.
We had 16-20 do we have sir.
We used to go somewhere to?
Yeah. See, we did not have a computer at all in the Institute.
Ok.
And our faculty members who were doing research
which needed acomputer used to go to Guindy Engineering College
with their papers.
Punch cards.
Punch cards and then taken them right,
I remember Professor Sankaran and others used to go there.
If the card one of them is replaced,
it will or rather if it gets interchanged once
we go on getting blank cards of output.
Ok.
He is right.
When did the Institute actually start becoming self-contained?
Because in the beginning many faculty stayed outside.
When I came in I know Professor Radhakrishna
was coming from outside.
Quite a few faculty were coming from Adyar and Saidapet.
Some chose to stay in Adyar
because of probably children’s education
whatever it is, but about 60-80 percent of the faculty
started living here from 64, 65 onwards.
Professor Swamy I think.
Why did the large number is there?
Large number is there yeah.
Sir, 63 only you are were there on campus.
I was there, I came in 62 or so.
A sloped road.
It was a sloped road.
Top the first floor and left side.
Yeah, C. C 1 type.
C 1 type.
That was a special ah...
Can I say something about C 1 type?
Sure sir this is..
Yeah ok.
No holds bar.
Ok sure.
If you want to criticize..
And this is only recording of old memories.
Yeah.
I mean I think I have a few things to say probably about
Professor Sengupto, our first Director.
He was very remarkable person
and I had a run in with him on a number of occasions,
but still I admire him and he is the, I think,
Institute owe a lot to him.
He used to take personal care
about every little thing in the campus,
every little thing in the campus and he used to refer
to them in a very possessive tone,
“my faculty, my head of the department, my students”
and everything would be his.
His. And he put lot of energy into everything he did
and one of his priced designs was the C 1 type,
it seems he designed that layout of your C 1 quarters
and that used to be really very convenient
and I know some people who joined there as lecturer in
C 1 type and would not leave it even after they became professors.
They stuck to C 1 type.
And so, and then this gentleman is very informal also,
he used to come and one evening he came to visit one of his,
one of our neighbors who was a Bengali and he probably,
he came for a social visit.
Then he dropped in our house.
He said, “How are you doing, how is the set up,
how is the quarters”?
Young man I was, I was not very, probably, prudent or diplomatic.
Yes.
I said I mean this, there used to be a small room.
Room.
I said probably one could have built a shelf here,
built-in shelf to keep books because it is a study room.
I could see that he was very much upset.
Upset.
Of course I said it is a very..
the set up is very nice very convenient,
because if I had altered the two remarks,
change the sequence, it have been alright.
Yeah.
But, he is a very nice person and then he,
but immediately he would get offended
if you say something inward, but…
Bibhuti Bhushan right sir?
Bibhuti Bhushan yeah.
Sengupto.
Once I had, I think this was my first year or so, 1962.
Guindy Engineering College asked me to come as an
external examiner for some practical examinations.
Normally we need to get permission and then I sent a letter.
Then Professor Sengupto called me and said,
“What happens to your lectures here”?
Sir, it is on 3 days, only 1 day I have lectures
and then I have made alternative arrangements”.
“Young man if you concentrate on...
Yeah.
..going as an examiner elsewhere then what happens to this”?
is what he was said. I said,
“Sir, we call them for their faculty as external examiners for,
for our own examinations.
So, we must reciprocate”.
He said ok, then he said ok,
but please don’t indulge in this too much.
So, the Gajendra circle.
Yes.
I mean when the design started was it by the first director? No?
Yes. Yes, it was.
I think it was done at the time of the first convocation in 64.
60s or 64?
64 first convocation.
Yeah.
I think Y.S. Ramaswamy, the Superintending Engineer
the Institute’s Superintending Engineer at that time,
I think he was the perhaps the architect.
Architect.
Yes.
With convocation you are top of the first convocation addressed.
Address it is going to yeah.
Yeah Germanic, but the Gajendra circle also
was built around the same time I think.
No, earlier 62, Luebke inaugurated the IIT foundation stone of IIT.
Yeah, but at the time the Gajendra circle was there? I doubt.
Y.S. Ramaswamy was there.
Ok.
OAT was built and..
OAT they laid the corner stone and.
And when the OAT was built, when first convocation was held.
I mean 1962.
So, Ramaswamy and Seshadri together took the degree to
Electrical Department at the first convocation right?
Yes.
For the very first convocation both of them took PhD.
May not be first convocation.
No not.
No.
Not the first convocation.
First convocation is 64.
64.
Not the first convocation.
Yeah.
Sir I believe the first computers came from the USA.
First?
Computers on campus.
There was an analog computer and ..
Yeah.
German computer I think which came from
in the year 1962 or so, is that right?
You see we had a small analog computer in the,
which came from Germany.
That was in the department.
That was in the electrical department
and then the Brooklyn Polytechnic Institute
they had a big analog computer built with walls vacuum cubes,
huge affair and they have no use for it anymore they had.
So, they thought it is a,
I mean they can give it as a gift to some Indian Institute and.
So, Professor Sampath was deputed to go there
and then bring that computer over here.
So, that was the second US computer.
That is the US computer which you have probably talked about.
There is a picture here.
You could tell us.
Yeah.
No.
Sir he is Professor Sampath.
Yeah.
Is this what Professor Sampath got as a gift?
Yes, as a gift yeah and it was so huge I believe..
Yeah.
That he when they did not know how to
move it out of the room.
So, they have to dismantle a section of the wall and then..
Drop it down.
Drop it down and then build it.
Was this computer used for
teaching purposes or what was done basically?
It was used for yes teaching purposes still.
I do not if you had two computers in.
Yeah.
department.
Yes Yeah.
This was all built with wall so.
Sir, This was our Building Sciences Block itself.
Sorry HSB HSB adjacent to the Central Lecture Theatre.
This used to be in, for a long time,
in one of the lecture halls in the ground floor.
Central HSB.
ESB.
Yeah.
Central central ESB.
Yeah, as I remember the.
C Subramaniam has come there
C Subramaniam is there.
C Subramaniam has come there for the inauguration of the
Computer Centre when we had the CDC
computer first computer, that Mahabala was the.
That is the IBM.
IBM computer.
IBM.
IBM computer IBM computer.
Yes.
At one point..
Yeah, that was the Professor Mahabala.
The department had a.
Sir.
DEC machine also PDP 11.
Yeah that.
Yes.
Those were also.
Sir.
No that was much later when I came.
That was later, that was much later.
When I came…
Sir the rightmost person is.
That is Chandy. Chandy.
Chandy.
Chandy is Chairman of the Board of Governors, this is Mahabala.
This is Mahabala.
So, I in fact, when I came to the department
there was still analogous to the control and.
Sir who is to the right of right of?
That is Erhard that Erhard Eppler.
Right.
Yeah, Eppler Eppler Minister for Cooperation Federal Republic of Germany.
Pratapa Reddy was the person who was handling the.
Sir, where is Professor Mahabala now? Bangalore or?
Must be Bangalore.
Sir how about the other roles that you have played,
other than academic roles were you in
wardenships of hostels or were you in charge of?
No.
Student activities of any kind.
He was used to be in the club.
I was a president in staff.
I was a president in staff club for one term and
of course, the various roles I had.
Twice you were head of the department?
Only once.
Only once?
That was in a.
Sir, is that Menon?
Here this one you remember Menon, know you see that.
Yeah.
This is Menon.
Second one.
Or first one.
Yeah, that is Menon.
Yeah.
I am not still.
Not sure I am not sure.
Who is that professor?
I am not sure who it is. I do not know.
Sir I think it is Menon
computer, communication department, communication sections.
Possibly, possibly, yeah.
What else did I do right?
I was also in charge of
CEC for sometime Centre Electronic Centre and.
Then, Dean Academic Research.
Professor Ramachandran asked me,
“I see your name you did not figure in the as a warden of the hostel.
So, would you like to become”?
I said no. Then he said “Ok. I respect your decision”.
Yeah, till which year were you in IIT?
When did you retire?
I retired in 93, October but of course,
I continued till the end of the academic year that was 94.
Then I came back in 96
as an emeritus ASTT fellow.
So, I continued for two more years.
Sir there was supposed to have been
science fair associated with the
cultural week and Mardi Gras at one time.
No.
There used to be an open house.
What is called an open house,
I remember two of them
that was the during Indiresan’s time
I think it was started,
Professor Indiresan when he was the Director
he started that and
two open house programs and..
One open house was started when Indiresan joined.
One was Pandalai’s time correct,
first one was Pandalai’s time.
Pandalai’s time.
Pandalai we have, Pandalai was there yeah.
Then cultural program Mardi Gras.
So.
It was given some other name earlier, remember?
No now it is known as Saarang.
Now, it is Saarang, Mardi Gras was the first one.
When was it started?
I do not know sir I do not know.
Probably.
1970.
I think Pandalai was Director at that.
No.
Pandalai was Director I think.
When I came it was known 73 or 74
yeah, but Mardi Gras in the 70s 73 or 74,
But earlier there was a cultural week, I understand in 62 or..
Sir was Pandalai in 74 Director?
Yeah Professor Pandalai was the director in 74.
Yeah, I think at that time the name Mardi Gras was given.
Ok.
And he first objected to it.
As for the, you talked about examinations and all that.
Well Ramachandran of course, he introduced the semester pattern.
I think Professor Indiresan,
he was the person who introduced lot of reforms. For example..
Student.
He made sure of yeah, electives.
Student.
teachers by student.
Student evaluation and then class committees to review
the results and then do any kind of moderation
that we like to have,
and doing away with external examinations
which are for except for the M.S. and Ph.D. M.Tech. degrees.
So, he introduced lot of reforms.
So that your results came out in quick time
immediately after the examinations. So.
within a week or so.
Yeah.
One week after the last exam the result should come out as a rule.
and so, examination reforms it is a very notable point
and which were for say due to Professor Indiresan.
Sir what was your experience of being a campus resident
in the sense that you are away from the
main city itself because I think Chennai was smaller than.
Actually I think that the results in the campus
are the best form best part of my service in IIT.
Yes sir, will you tell us about that?
You see we had everything that we wanted.
What all the good things that you can get
in the outside the city metropolis are available here.
Once in a way we used to go out
just for the fun of shopping or eating outside,
but everything else is here and then
it is like a Tapovana right,
the tranquility affairs Tapovana with the campus of a city
both with enjoyed the best of both worlds.
Right.
And so, I think I always tell anybody
whom I meet I mean talked about IIT campus
living is the best part of our service in IIT.
The Open Air Theater was the binding factor
I think every week you met practically..
Yes.
on campus. So,
Yes Sunday movies I mean Saturday movies we used to go
and then cultural programs and so on.
Little language movies.
Little.
At the time of any festival.
Yeah.
Holy was a ritual celebration that.
Once I remember when J. Krishnamurti
was giving a talk in the Open Air Theater.
Yeah, that time.
We were sitting in the step there one side,
M.S. Subbulakshmi came and sat on at the steps.
Yes.
And then it took some time for people to notice
and then somebody came gently
and escorted her to a seat in the front.
See that is an important point.
There have been lots of VIP visitors on campus.
Yes, lot VIP visitors inside.
Yeah. So, can
Ok, we used do, another good thing that
Professor Indiresan did is extramural lectures.
So, a number of luminaries in different fields used to,
were invited to give lectures and as a Dean academic,
was Dean research I had a role to play to receive them,
some of them and then escort them and so on.
So, in that capacity I have met quite a few of luminaries.
Sonal Mansingh dancers.
Dancers.
Then R. K. Laxman.
Yes.
R. K. Laxman he was a he said somebody asked him
with your all your cartoons and all these we could have
formed much better if you had gone abroad.
Then he said “No, raw material is here for my cartoons.
Where can I get this kind of raw material elsewhere?
So, he is and so, he was very nice and then Kirloskar
that Kirloskar the.. this.. what is forget the name.
Ramaswamy Cho Ramaswamy.
Cho Ramaswamy, P Subramaniam came
in a couple of occasions C Subramaniam.
I saw him now only.
And the lander who went on top of Everest. Hillary.
Hillary Hillary.
We know he was here.
Sir John Hillary?
Edmund Hillary.
Edmund Hillary came.
Yeah.
He was a New Zealand High Commissioner in India at that time.
Yes yeah.
So, he was asked and he gave a talk
about the Himalayan Institute which was running.
Professor Bardeen also came.
Professor Bardeen was a visiting professor
Professor Bardeen Nobel laureate in twice in physics,
but the extraordinary lectures brought a number of people
to the campus and then
it was very nice occasion for the people to.
They were initiated by Professor Indiresan.
Yes, the program was initiated by Professor Indiresan.
And he arranged a slot in one afternoon.
Wednesday.
Free the time table.
Ok.
Yeah, you were there anyway.
The classes used to be suspended.
Yes.
And that particular 2 hours.
2 hours, yes.
What about other visitors to the department itself
well you have any
yeah Professor Bardeen was see Professor Bardeen.
others not only engineering department.
Bardeen came for physics department not electrical department.
Ok.
Professor Ramasastry invited him and he came.
Professor Pauling came earlier.
But he also like he gave a..
In chemistry.
Chemistry lecture.
He is another double Nobel laureate
in peace and chemistry I think.
Some notable right..
Golding is one professor from who wrote a
classic book called Electrical Measurement, he visited once.
E. W. Golding yeah.
E. W. Golding.
Were you playing tennis in the campus sir?
No.
You did not play tennis?
I used to play the ping pong.
Oh yeah.
Very badly and bridges, bridge sometimes.
You used to play in the Staff Club almost everyday.
Yeah, I used to, I used to play bridge.
Sankaran used to play tennis I think.
Yeah.
He played for some time.
Tennis and of course, my wife used to say
I will take the tennis court,
but keep it there and go play bridge. My wife
Was there interaction between the students
and the staff in terms of bridge play and game.
Yes.
culture of bridge
Yes, they used to have some ..
I remember one occasion when the students invited for their
some hostel tournament and then a team was sent
from the staff club and our people won.
So, there used to have some..
Was it the 70s that this Bridge activity peaked?
Yeah 70s.
Tournaments used to be held in the two rooms and the HSB.
Yes and even in that shed Ladies Club,
used to be Ladies Club
I do not know what it is called now.
They used to have some Bridge tournaments there.
One interaction I remember
I think just when you are talking about
this I am reminded of this in 1973.
I think there was a strike,
remember Professor Swamy?
What in that?
There was this employee strike.
Ah yeah yeah.
Yeah, that was in 1973 or 74
due to some hostel problems
all the non faculty employees went on strike.
Yeah.
That was a very tense period because the
others, they did not want to shut down the hostels.
So, the hostels had to run and the staff members
stayed on the campus and so,
there was a lot of interaction between the students
and the faculty at that time
when the students used to help
in the running of the
and then faculty members used to
invite the students to their houses for..
Yeah yes.
Dinner or lunch or what case it may be
and then the students used to take the milk carts
and then supply to the faculty
and some of us used to
run around and the circuit breakers
which used to trip now and then
all around keep the electricity system going.
very nice.
And it was period of tension
at the same time there was some kind of.
Bonding.
Bonding between these students staff that was.
How long did this go on?
About.
10 days.
About a week to 10 days.
Police was called. In the end police was called.
Police were called, I think that was a interesting thing.
That was.
They used to throw arrows
from one hostel to another hostel. Yeah.
Who? Students?
Fighting between hostels used to go on.
No..ok that period.
How..the nature on our campus is
one of the highlights of our IIT Madras.
How was it when you joined?
That is, is it true that area around the ESB
was quiet bare at that time?
Now it is full of trees.
Can you recollect how it was?
When it was built what was it like?
No at the back of ESB there used to have a big Banyan tree
and in the front we had those
shaded trees it was there all the time.
No sir. What he is asking is,
do you remember I think we have to be joined only
between the ESB and MSB in fact,
one night we had a dinner where all the students
and faculties were all together.
Yeah, but true.
Yeah.
Bushes were clear bushes were clear
the big trees were there all the time
big trees were there all the time.
And the in the organization in the beginning,
again in Professor Sengupto’s time this was set up
the Central Milk Supply Scheme was started
professor by Professor Sengupto
because earlier they used the local
milk supply people used to bring their cows
and then used to deliver milk at their houses.
I mean in the very in the very beginning in the very beginning.
Bring the.
In the very.
Bring the cows and milk our house.
And with their usual tricks
and all with water and all those things I mean.
Then.
Ramana Murthy.
There was one gentleman
named Professor Ramana Murthy.
Yeah.
In the physics department
he did yeoman service for the establishment of the
hostels and common facilities for the faculty and students.
So, he negotiated with a number of
local milk supply vendors and then
he arranged to have the cows
and all brought it to shed there
and then the milk procured and also negotiated,
supplemented by the government.
Government right.
Government and. So, he also made sure that
we purchased the commodities required for
various hostels in bulk and then Institute's.
So that the prices the rates can come down.
So, this was all due to Ramana Murthy.
Sir in fact, there was an
arm of IIT called the Central Supplies.
Yes.
Supplies only CS.
CS Central Supplies.
That was the birth of that.
That was the birth of that yes.
So, I have one more specific question
about the campus itself.
See I think behind those trees
it was a barbed wire fence I think,
that the tennis courts beyond
between the tennis courts and..
what is that avenue called?
Velachery side.
There is I think there was a
used to be a barbed wire fence.
There was a fence.
But there were lot of breaches
I mean fence was there.
Yes.
But people used to go under or above and all.
So, what was the Velachery like at that time?
I mean were there lots of inhabitants there or
was it a bare land?
Beyond that.
Yes, around the time of ?
Comparatively barren perhaps,
but it is not really devoid of any.
There were some trees and bushes and all that is,
but that extent is up to the wall.
Velachery that separates Velachery think
there used to be probably less
there used to be less vegetation than here.
There used to be gate near Brahmaputra hostel right
that is very from where the people
will enter from the village and go to this side.
Yeah, there Brahmaputra.
we have difficulty in identifying the number of.
People there.
Situations and people.
Yeah.
If you could help us it would be great.
This is Vasudevan.
This is Vasudevan yes.
Professor VGK, MV. Who is center person?
Baron von Mirbach, Baron von Mirbach.
Baron von Mirbach.
Ok.
Was he Ambassador?
Probably. VIP that is what is put.
This is Varadacharya.
Varadacharya.
T. Varadacharya?
K. S. Varadacharya.
T. S. Varadacharya.
T S Varadacharya, T S Varadacharya
he was a senior technical assistant in our lab.
And who was that sitting there?
Sitting there is T. S. Varadacharya.
Very very good gentleman.
Is that a potentiometer?
DC potentiometer.
That is a DC potentiometer.
With all that PRO type of a cover.
This is Pauling.
Professor Pauling.
Linus Pauling.
Is it Ly n i a u s or L i.
How do you spell Linus Pauling? L i n i s n u s.
L i
L y I think it was put there.
It’s a mistake. Yes.
one by one. So, direct Pauling yeah this is.
Yeah, that is Professor Sampath and Pauling and yeah.
Sengupto, Sampath and then Sethunathan.
That is Sethunathan registrar, Sethunatan registrar right.
That is the same photograph following.
I remember her.
She used to put the board Professor C V Sethunathan.
And first remove it you know it you are very clear.
Yeah that.
one by one. So that we can have parallel tabs.
Yeah.
One by one.
This one is communication.
Menon.
Yeah, this is Menon probably.
Menon.
This is T.V. Gopal.
T.V. Gopal.
And that is Sadasivam. Sorry that is..
Anantha.
T.V. Gopal
C.R. Ramaswamy.
No no before that before that.
No
Pillai
No maybe student.
Maybe a student.
Is it the post graduate lab or is the research lab?
Sir this is UG lab, 30 no yeah this is 302
because the control panel was on this side 301
On the other side. Yeah.
This was standard sir.
These are all set up by Siemens Company
and their representatives in India.
Siemens people set up this console.
Sir was these labs there right from the beginning sir
in 1962 when the building was open?
60s.. This was built completely only in 64-65.
Because first the frame came,
the building was completed
then all these equipments came
in a crate and then the wiring is very extensive.
Yes.
That is in principle if there is a special supply
available from a generator in the measurements lab
for example, somebody at any part of the building
in the other sections also would be able to tap that.
Because all the supplies are going to
the centralized control panel
or the measurements lab from there spare
wires are there running from the other lab.
ok.
So, in principle if he has got some
special type of sine wave
at a variable frequency
somebody else can tap that anywhere else. So, it.
In fact, I used it for my Ph.D. in 1980,
I generated the waveform in machines lab
and used it in my room in room number 317.
So, brought it back to the
control center of measurements lab
which was room number 310
from there I routed it to 370.
Right.
And I was using that.
Was that a German Technical Institute
you got from or is it from Siemens company?
It is Siemens Company, Siemens.
Yeah, the machines and some of the things may have
come from different sources like and so on,
but the contact was Siemens only
they planned the distribution part.
Right was there a DC generator
DC battery room or something like that.
No.
DC.
We had a DG cell.
Yes.
I mean motor generator set.
Motor generator set which can generate
various frequency AC supply that is one.
And then one which generates almost a pure sine wave
because in the normal ISP generators do not get
give you a pure sine wave,
is contaminated by various harmonics.
I see.
But one which is almost free of that impurity..
That is said which is used for calibration purposes.
I see.
That is one which is special.
Ok.
And then there is another which were the voltage is
regulated precisely it does not change very much.
And also we had a 3 phase balancing unit.
So.. Which will give exactly 400 volts 120
degree phase shift 3 phase supply.
From a generator is it?
No, it was a separate unit.
sir.
It will operate on the mains it will adjust.
Increase decrease it is like an auto transformer.
This is Harry.
Machines lab.
- Contribute
to the Centre -
Monetary
Support - Digital
Material
Prof. E.G. Thulapurkar (Retd. faculty, Aerospace Engineering) in conversation with Parvathi (student)
Good morning sir.
Good morning. I am Parvathi.
So, I guess we will just start off with the questions. Yeah.
So, to...from the beginning, could you just
tell us a bit about your career, where you studied,
and the...your reason for joining
the Aeronautics Department so early on.
I did my B. E. Mechanical from
Vikram University Ujjain,
of course I studied in Indore. Ok.
and...in 1964.
Then I joined IISc Bangalore.
For M. E. in Aeronautical Engineering. Ok.
And that I completed in 1966.
And then I was looking for some industrial experience in HAL,
for...before taking academics,
but that year there was an inci...that
there was a heavy devaluation of the rupee
in June 1966
and therefore, there was sort of job freeze.
And so, I could not get into HAL, but then
NAL had offered some...this fellowship.
Research...Senior Research Fellowship,
so I was there for about four months
and then IIT Madras was hiring but...for...
because the department was coming up.
So, I received a...senior Professor G. Subramaniam joined in
July, I think July 2000, July 1966.
Then some other Professor R. M. S. Gowda
and T. K. Varadan joined later,
and then I joined in January 1967. Ok.
Yeah, and of course that was the...
but then I have continued here.
Ok, and what was the reason for choosing the aeronautics branch?
No, that was after B. E. we were just
thinking aeronautics, one of the
advanced topics and so on. Ok.
So that glamour
Yes, sure. ...glamour yeah.
Ok and so, when you joined,
the department was in its nascent state then. Yeah.
And so, who were the faculty members,
the Head of the Dep...could you just give us a feel of the department yeah
at that point of time see
I would just like to mention at this stage, that
Professor S. R. Valluri,
Sitaram Rao Valluri,
he...he joined IIT in 1964,
he had done actually M. E. from IISc,
and then he did some work at CalTech.
California Institute of Technology,
and then, in many American institutes they have
Department of Aeronautics and Applied Mechanics.
So, he started that department,
but it so happened that 1965, the Founder-Director of NAL,
Neelakantan, he passed away
and Dr. Valluri was requested to start
become the Director there.
So, at that time, he is 65 I think, he joined there.
Professor Balaraman, K. Balaraman
was there, and then D. V. Reddy,
they were there. But then an Aero they started
first batch in...'63 batch was taken
to enter, to take and so,
they were there, then 19...7...then after...by '66-'67,
they started having aero courses,
and so they were recruiting.
So, Professor G...as I mentioned G. Subramaniam and Varadan...
and '67 January I joined,
but there were other faculty members in Applied Mechanics,
like Professor B. H. L. Gowda, Ashwathanarayana,
and others were there. Ok.
Yeah. Ok, and Professor Santhakumar had mentioned that
in the beginning there was more focus on teaching than on research.
So, how did that affect the branch?
Yeah what happened was that...
six...yeah yeah...there is...it was Aeronautics and Applied Mechanics.
And, but because of that, it could get some German aid.
And so, Professor Armin Klein,
he joined I think in '68 or so. Ok.
And he got some facilities for this. Ok.
And then research could be done,
and at that time of course, there were not many
senior people here.
So, research was slightly...
there is also many of us who joined,
who had M. Tech. degrees and all that,
so we were doing teaching,
but soon after, that is why...what I felt was
that Professor Sengupto’s contribution was
to set up the infrastructure and all that. Yeah.
And the German professors who were here,
they were setting up laboratories,
which were later...
later became research laboratories and all that. Ok.
So Professor Sengupto did play a major part
in the development of the department.
Like, could you tell us any memories of him?
No I...I was rather a junior.
Ok, I mean I was a Lecturer, but still,
not so high to be in contact,
I did not have much with...we use to know he is Director
and he used to address sometimes, and all that.
But not...but this is what I say,
his role was to develop rather...
develop the infrastructure and all that,
and the German professors,
and as I mentioned Professor Armin Klein..
he had worked in Göttingen under famous Professor Schlichting.
He had worked, and so he came and then he
he got one good very good tunnel,
thats a return circuit tunnel
which is called Göttingen type tunnel Ok
and it was started...and on mid...I think early '70s it was
set up and many people used it for research purposes.
I had also used it, yeah. Ok.
Research and Consultancy Project. Ok.
And to talk about the building itself,
when was the department building built,
and, like was it extended at any point of time?
What...in that also, I would just like to give a little background. Ok sir.
See earlier, this Department of Aeronautics and Applied Mechanics,
but then in late '60s,
there was a committee, national committee, Ok.
which recommended that there should be
Aerospace Departments in many IITs. Ok.
And so, that IIT Madras also decided,
and then, in order to give more emphasis to Aeronautics,
it...it was decided to separate.
So, and also Professor Pandalai. K. A. V. Pandalai,
he was...he had worked in structures
and in Brooklyn Polytechnic.
So he also came and...
then a separate department was formed in...in 1969.
4th of April I think.
1969, the building was inaugurated
by the then Chairman Board of Governors
Dr. H. V....Mister H. V. R Iengar. Ok.
Yeah, so department was started, and then of course
we had...we had laboratories, space and all that.
And later Gas Dynamics Laboratory was...
because now we did not have much...
I mean we did not have German aid.
So, we were developing our own laboratory,
so Gas Dynamics Laboratory was developed, just nearby. Ok.
And then Rarefied Gas Dynamics, that was the...that area,
I will perhaps talk about that later. Sure.
Rarefied Gas Dynamics facility was erected,
and it was...it has been used very well.
So, that also a separate. Ok.
And something that catches the eye about
the Aerospace Department is the
aircraft that you have outside it.
So, how did the department come to get it?
No, see early...as you have also mentioned there,
that there was an old airplane.
So, old airplane was given by the Air Force
and...that, but that was rather dilapidated,
and so, we were looking for different airplane.
So Navy gave this, this is...airplane Navy has given.
So the one that is lying discarded
at the back is the one you got earlier. Yeah.
Ok fine, fine.
Then, could you tell us a bit about
Professor Ramchandran, the second Director.
Yeah, he joined in the late, I mean, towards the end of 1967,
and he did give,
I mean he gave emphasis to the research. Ok.
And actually...may...he was...he...
I had heard somewhere, that when he
joined, there were only 40 professors in IIT,
but when he left, there were about 100 or so. Ok.
100 professor...may...that number may not be correct,
but 100-120 professors were there,
and Aero also Aero Department also benefited,
senior people were inducted, professor level and all that.
Professor N. R. Rajappa. He did his Ph. D....
of course, he was here earlier in Maths Department,
he did Ph. D. in Stanford, and then he joined Aero Department,
then then of course, Professor Pandalai
as I mentioned he was there, Professor Damodaran
and A. Krishnan they joined.
But in '70...and then Professor T. K. Bose,
Ph. D. from Stuttgart, he joined
in high...gas dynamics and all that.
And then Professor A. K. Sreekanth from...what is that
it is called University of Toronto Institute of Aerospace Study. Ok.
It is a famous institute.
So he had worked there, and he came.
And then Professor N. R. Subramaniam.
He was a well-known scientist in NAL Bangalore.
So he...he came for four years - '71 to '75.
So this period, we had many people.
Inducted and so the department...
then the research activity started,
you know as you had asked for research,
Professor Klein was there,
then Professor Pandalai,
then this Professor Sreekanth, Professor Rajappa, Professor Bose.
Then they were guiding Research Scholars,
ofcourse, I did work with Professor Rajappa and all. Ok.
And to talk about your other activities on the campus,
like were you involved in any other activities?
Like were you a warden of any hostel or something like that?
No, I was the Assistant Warden in Narmada Hostel Ok.
From '67 to '70. Ok.
But afterwards, I was mainly concentrating on academics. Ok, fine, fine.
Then how was...like
could you tell us a bit about how it was to teach students
so early on in the department, like
how was the...how was their attitude towards the subject,
and a bit about your teaching experience?
Ofcourse, there I have some attitude like that,
if there...I mean my feeling is only about
10 to 20 percent of the students
are interested in a particular topic and pursuing it.
And so, I was happy if that was happening,
see we used to have only about twenty students,
about five-six students are interested,
so they would come and meet me outside the class,
and we would interact with them. Ok.
And and ofcourse, I gave,
ofcourse later I will come to my topic of
research and all, turbulent flows. Yeah.
I used to give courses on
introduction turbulence flows and their prediction.
There the students from various departments used to...
used to...I mean that is...they used to attend my classes,
and actually I used to give them notes,
and those notes were circulated even abroad.
So people even there, they used to study me,
when I went to University of Maryland,
they said we are studying your notes and all. Ok.
So, that way it was one happy experience. Ok.
But there were some students who may not be interested,
so that is how...and because
everybody is not interested in every subject.
Do you have any other
memorable incidents that you still remember
from your teaching career,
anything specific sort of? Yeah.
No, not...means...I was rated as one of the good teachers and
that some students would come, and there was
some good students, one is one S. P. Vishwanathan.
He did it in '60...no '70, 1970 batch
he was, and then he was in Boeing,
he was in Boeing and all that,
and he used to do,
but even as B. Tech. student, he did some work
which was later used, you know the winglets.
Winglets on the airplanes,
he had thought about it here.
And then he went there,
he went...he was in Lockheed no...
he was in Lockheed, I think
he was in Lockheed Martin,
and then he was nice.
I had his notes,
see he had...he used to write nice answer...he...
his assignments used to be good,
so I had kept them.
And then in 2004, he came here
as a Visiting Professor. Ok.
So I showed him, and he was very happy,
very happy to see his notes, yeah. Ok
And, one more thing sir, Yeah.
we understand that there was a brief collaboration with
France with...for the department.
So, how did this affect the department?
Yeah, that...no, it was useful. Ok.
And that is...it started in mid-1970s
and Professor Pandalai was Director from '73
to...he was the HOD...first HOD of Aerospace,
then '73 he became the Director.
'73 to '77 he was the Director,
and since Aero did not have any aid,
he...although he had inspired us to
develop the laboratories on our own,
but he also procured this...
or rather he was instrumental in getting this collaboration.
So...we of five people visited, under that,
so Professor Gowda, S. Santhakumar,
then S. Krishnan, P. Venkateswarlu and myself,
we went there for a varying period. nine to... Ok.
nine months to 15 months or so,
we used to...we went to some of the very important laboratories
and did, and then they gave a shock tube.
I forget which institute they gave,
right, they gave a shock tube in that
Professor...for that Professor Sreekanth and Dr. Kurian,
Job Kurian, they went to France
then they brought it, and set it up.
So it was only a small collaboration,
ofcourse there was a very interesting...
then once we asked one of the French Professors
that "Why not extend it?"
They said, "You bought some French airplanes,
so we gave a collaboration.
You buy more aeroplanes, we will give you more."
So, it was... Ok.
So, now we could, we would like to move a bit
on to your fields of research.
Yeah. So, could you tell us a bit about your major areas of interest?
Yeah, I have been working in the area of
Turbulent Measurement and Computation of Turbulent Flows. Ok.
And so, I have given,
actually invited lecture on...on this topic,
or on turbulent flows for one week
short term courses, for major aerospace industry
that is NAL in 1987, ISRO in 1991,
and then DRDA in...I think 1996, HAL in 1990,
and also I...abroad I have given lectures on this subject,
turbulent flows and their prediction.
And then I gave advice to ADE
Aeronautical Development Establishment
when they...who were developed this LCA airplane,
that is what model should be used for
computation of low pass airplanes.
And that has also been published as a review article
in 1997, in Progress in Aerospace Sciences. Yeah. Ok.
So, like, could you tell us about your first research project
and how was it to get funding and other support for the project?
I would just like to give a background. Sure.
That...you see in mid-'70s,
The Government of...the not...Ministry of Defence,
they established this...there is one board,
Aeronautical Research and Development...
Development Board, AR & DB.
So, this, and on this was rather
they would fund open ended projects, research projects
and all, not exactly application oriented.
And so...and they were also visual,
they had people, eminent people from IITs and IISc, NAL,
and various people, and they would give projects.
So, Professor Sreekanth got a project for...
I...this rarefied gas dynamics facility. Ok.
Because that was not there in the country and actually...
and when it was built in early '80s, I think.
So, it was one of the best facilities in the South-East Asia.
South-East Asia and then ofcourse,
the shock tube was also there,
that was also updated under this ARDB projects.
And I had a project in '80...
'84, I had first project from ARDB, wave boundary layer interaction.
So, we did studies on that,
and under that, we lot equipment.
See, the main...as I mentioned, ARDB
was very generous in funding,
and also, they didn't ask for...you know applications immediately.
So, because I had also gone to France and that...
I had also done something work on turbulence and all that,
and so that was very helpful to continue,
then it was a four year project,
we did some work, published many papers,
and yeah, after of...subsequently
I had a project from Volkswagen Foundation.
For flow study inside cars...inside,
because outside people have studied inside,
so for that, we got a equipment...laser Doppler anemometer. Ok.
Laser Dop...so we were able to get this
latest equipment with the help of these projects. Ok.
So, when you look back on your research career,
what is it that you find the most memorable,
or most successful sort of?
That is, I was also...I was trying to involve many...
I was also involved in Computational Fluid Dynamics,
of course Professor T. K. Bose and
some other peoples...people will also be there,
Professor Ramakrishna, M. Ramakrishna
had joined our department in 1990,
and so CFD, that is Computational Fluid Dynamics
was becoming a very important area.
And so, we brought...we...and this was being,
the research was being done in various departments.
Aero...Applied Mechanics, Civil, Mechanical, Chemical, Mathematics,
and so...Metallurgy also.
So we brought toge...people together,
and then proposed a big project to DST,
and they gave us a three crore project.
So, to set up a CFD centre ok.
That was project was given in 1998,
and then centre was...centre started working and all that.
And ofcourse, at that time there had been this,
India was not being high speed computers and all that,
high, so we took help of DR...
there is a DRDL Lab called ANURAG. Ok.
Advanced Numerical Research Analysis,
so they built a supercomputer. Ok.
Supercomputer for our purpose,
of course that it was super...at that time,
but now it is, of course, ALDR this C-DAC
Centre for Advanced Computing in Pune, they also had.
So we got that, and then we worked, about 25
staff members from various departments,
were working together,
and we did computations for various industries
and all that...GTRE Gas Turbine Research Es...
so we had some six-seven projects from them.
Then DRDL, DRDL Hyderabad.
We...and many other...you know, in some industries also
we developed some codes and all that.
It is still there, centre is there.
But then...I will come to that, later also.
Some things...what happened.
And one other thing I would like to know is like
how was the collaboration with other departments then?
So...like the interaction, teaching or research,
could you tell us a bit about that? Yeah
As I mentioned here, that, I mean see
Aero we had four-five people who were working,
the...actually the...the CFD centre,
coordinators also, there were five coordinators. Ok.
Five or six, six coordinators,
and they were from different department.
Aero of course, we...because I was the Principal Coordinator,
Aero there were one more Ramakrishna, Yeah.
And then Professor Sreenivas Jayanthi from Chemical Engineering,
then Professor T. Sundararajan from Mechanical Engineering.
And somebody else...
but ofcourse, one more person was there,
so five-six coordinators...and then, we had good relationship. Ok.
People from Mathematics and all that,
so one Professor Usha in Mathematics, Yeah yeah.
she...we have worked with her
and we have published, I mean several papers together.
So otherwise people they think that
Maths people you cannot...work with them...with them easily,
but now we...we, but with, understanding it was possible,
Metallurgy people were there. Ok.
So it was...there about 25-30 people were,
you know, using the facilities, students would use,
and, we were doing problems of industry by solving... Ok.
And one other thing, like the FRP Centre was
set up around this time,
so were you involved with it in...in any form?
No, that was a slightly different area,
but the history as I...as I see about it is,
that in 1972, I think it was 19...
this CSIR, you know Scientis... Yeah,
Council of Scientific Industrialists.
I...I think that it was having Silver Jubilee Ok.
in '72 or '73, somewhere around that.
And then Professor Pandalai,
he was given a project by CSIR.
Silver Jubilee fund, that to start a Centre for Composites...
Composites...FRP, FRP means Ok
Fibre Reinforced Plastic, Ok
this research centre was started in 1972.
So...and then he...he...it was attached to the Aero Department
and some two-three people were...
one Professor Kunukkuseril...Xavier Kunukkuseri he was... Ok
he...he was there and some others were there,
and he mentioned about Professor Nair or somebody,
so Nair and others were there.
And then in the active...they did very good work,
industry and others were...they were developing manpower,
they were they develop...
and also did lot of work for others,
they acquired equipment
which could be used by industry and others. Ok.
And so, in order to further encourage ARDB I think,
ARDB gave funds to have more equipment, more faculty,
and also three-four people from from other department also. Ok.
So, people from Aero were there,
then people from Metallurgy, people from Civil,
So three-fo...they used to work,
it became interdisciplinary centre, Comptech,
it...then it become Comptech in 1997. Ok.
And it was doing, it was doing good work. Ok.
Ofcourse, I will come to it later, what happened to... Sure, sure.
what...some problems came up, yeah.
And sir, moving on a bit to your life on campus,
did you stay in campus during those days? Yes, yes
ofcourse, as Assistant Warden I was here and then,
afterwards I had...I was in Taramani Guest House
for some time, and then we moved after marriage,
and we moved to quarter, that was in D-Type,
then C1-Type and B-Type.
It was a nice...ofcourse,
my wife was also working in KV-IIT. Ok.
And son was study...son was studying in Vanavani.
So, we had...it was very lovely, Yeah yeah
ofcourse deer would come into our camp...compound and all that.
So, like anything else, like how was the...
was the OAT...did you go for the movies at OAT? Yeah,
we used to go, we used to go every week and all,
even after retirement I used to go for some time,
I used to go. Ok.
And looking back, could you identify any
exceptional research scholars and
any experiences with them?
People you still remember from your career?
Yeah, now...I would mention about Dr. Gangan Prathap.
Gangan Prathap you might have heard of his name,
he...he...he...he was first in JEE in 1969. Ok.
And then he joined Aero Department,
and then he was first in B. Tech., Ok.
I think President's Medal, yeah President's Medal he got,
and...Gangan Prathap...and then he
joined our Department for Ph. D.,
then of course he did Aero B. Tech. Aero,
so first time anybody from Aero had stood first. First
Stood first in IIT, and then he
joined for Ph. D. under Professor Varadan. Yeah.
Varadan in Structural Mechanics and all that,
and he finished Ph. D. in four years.
In the '78 he had finished his Ph. D., then he joined NAL. ok
National Aerospace Laboratories, Bangalore,
and he did work in Structural Mechanics and all that,
he...he got Bhatnagar Award and many things,
and he is...he is one of the I...I think he is the only from Aero
to get the Distinguished Alumnus Award
and so, he has made... Ok.
so he was...of course, I had very good students,
they have published some papers and
some of them, they remember and all that.
And, I have...I mean, I had also a good
experience with M. S. scholars. Ok.
See, what happened, M. S. scholars most...
many of them are from other colleges,
not from IIT, because our own students used to go abroad mostly.
So, the M. S. scholars I found them
very, I mean and that...are hardworking and also
willing to listen and all that, learn,
and then I used to publish papers with them
and so, it was nice.
So we have published several
papers in international journals,
and done some good work,
industrial work and all that. Ok.
So, Ph. D. scholars also have been good,
I had one person from Iran. Ok.
So, he... From Iran.
Yeah Iran, he was a student of Iran.
So, I had good relationship, and yeah. Ok.
And now looking back at the department as a,
could I...could you identify like two or three
major implications that the work
has had on the aerospace industry,
like department has had on that industry?
That as you see, this CFD Centre
which was there, Yes
it was...it...it did...I mean projects
for DTRE or DRDL and many other research.
even some private...these on metallurgy,
the...the Institute of Metallurgy Company,
they m...they mould and all that.
So, they ha...they were having an imported code.
But then, they wanted to make changes
and they...and it was becoming costly,
so IIT people wrote.
IIT people wrote a code for that, Ok
that is you know, it is a very complicated,
the...in the mould, the molten metal is coming,
it is freezing, and so, phase change and all that.
And so it was completed already...Professor T. Sundararajan of
Mechanical, and Professor what is his name, Prasanna Kumar. Ok
Of Metallurgy. You know Professor Prasanna Kumar, Yes yes
he is still there I think, he is still the faculty yeah. Yes.
So, Prasanna Kumar, and Sundararajan and others,
they did project for industry
and so, that was one thing.
Then, yeah and department, yeah
this...I...what is that...yeah rarefied gas dynamics I think,
that was the unique in the
neighbourhood country and neighbourhood.
So, a lot of research,
interesting research for ISRO was done. Ok.
And then shock tube also, yeah the...
because we...we have at high...high...high speeds
and all that, you have the shocks
so the, when we had updated facility.
Just to give you an example in that
rarefied gas dynamics facility...you have a jet of air,
it expands at a certain rate,
in this ordinary atmosphere. Yes.
But in the rarefied atmosphere,
it expands much...much...
much faster...wider, it becomes wider,
and then in a...in a...in a satellite,
there are small jets to correct its rotation and all that.
There are small jets.
Now, these jets are...when they are fired,
the...that jet will come,
and that jet should not hit the solar panels.
So, that kind of studies people have done, and so on
and then another thing was,
our Professor, I didn't mention our Professor S. Krishnan
Professor S. Krishnan joined IIT say '68-'69 or so,
and he did lot of work in propulsion. Ok
So, he developed his Rockets and Missiles Laboratory.
There, they did lot of propellant tests for propellants, for DRDL.
And DRDL was given propellants,
which were more efficient,
you know...you know the specific thrust,
there is a term called specific thrust,
so they had more specific thrust.
So, he did lot of work along
with Satyanarayana and others.
And then the gas dynamics and other laboratories,
the Professor Sujith, R. I. Sujith
he did lot of work for...consultancy work for ISRO. Ok.
ISRO, so department made
Parvathi: Quite a lot of...[Indistinct Dialogue] Yeah yeah.
Parvathi: Ok, and Because you know, and one thing was most of the
aerospace organizations they had this embargo.
So DRDL was not getting technology from outside,
ISRO was not getting technology from outside.
So, our peop...and even nuclear research
you know that is Kalpakkam and others. Yes.
So they...they were denied in this thing,
our people were helping them.
See people from...and the
the flow inside the reactors are complicated.
They have different material sodium, liquid
sodium, and with a different type of fluid and all, so
flow inside that and complicated flow.
so people have been solving those things...problem Ok
Sir, and one other thing, like with all your experience
in the field, like could you tell us
like two or three qualities that you think
an aerospace engineer should have,
just looking back on your experience?
I see, you know aerospace what we try to do is,
it is...it is something at the cutting edge level.
So, we give them general background. Yeah.
That is because...but at the same time,
they are given more fundamentals and computational skills. Yeah.
Experimental skills, all the fundamentals, Yeah
computational and experimental skills, we...
so they have good mathematical background,
because this, you know computational fluid dynamics
or aero dynamics, or structural mechanics,
they involve advance techniques, Yeah.
finite element methods and so on.
So our students have given background in
computational techniques and also mathematics.
So, they are able to solve problems in different areas,
and also they go to different areas. Yes.
Our students have been going to different areas
and doing very well, even one of them,
there is one...Sumantran. Sumantran, he was
he...he was in General Motors.
He was...he was you know...and then he came and he was in...
he was in Tata Motors. ok.
And this I think Nano and all that
were...he was...he was one of the
persons who...he lives here only I think,
he...he...in Besant Nagar, but he was been...
So he was...so like that, there were our,
they have general background.
So, they are able to fit into various areas.
And, looking at the situation of the industry right now,
how do you think 'Make in India' and the increased
external investment will help the department, and the industry?
Now, as I have mentioned earlier, that
our people have been helping the aeros...
I mean that aerospace laboratories and R and D,
because most of the aerospace is actually is like
they do R and D, and then they produce,
it is not much of a mass production,
but you know, the satellites are made,
but there are problems, our people have been solving them,
and even this...some time back, they have...they...
they have flown that reusable vehicle. Yeah.
So, some of our people have helped in that, Ok
they have done some problem, here...here and also
DRDL the...the some of the missiles,
they enter the atmosphere.
So how that...what should be the
type of material for the heat shield and all that,
so many of these...and even as
I mentioned, nuclear power also.
So people have been helping,
so, there is a potential available.
So if now, other people also, they have some problems,
they can come, and our people can tackle them. Ok.
So that may...that Make in India,
where it is not Make in India, just producing,
but if there...there will be technological inputs,
so I do not know, this maybe this, our Research Park, Yes.
they must be helping them.
So, and if some of them,
ofcourse, I am not sure whether aero people
are involved with them, but they can be involved
and they...there should be...that should be,
and they should...I mean...that is, they should design and make. Yes
Ok, you are saying it should not be just Make in India. Just making.
Ok Ofcourse, in making also if there are any difficulties,
our Production Engineering and other...
a Manufacturing Eengineering you know, MES. Yes
People are there to sort out those problems.
So, to just close off, could you just like...
what would you like to say it to the young aerospace engineers
in campus, and like everywhere around?
What...see when I become a HOD in 1995,
I was finding that some of the younger people
were drifting in...away from research,
so, then what...what...I tried to do something,
and so Professor Sujith,
in '95, he joined and then Professor...
now they are Professors, Satyanarayana Chakravarthy.
They joined during that period.
So, I used to, when they came
and met me after joining,
I told him that, "You concentrate on research,"
because what I told them is that IIT teaching
is different from other colleges,
Because here people do research.
People are doing research
and the research findings they percolate into teaching.
So that is how the teaching is much...at a higher level.
And, how to keep on doing research, I told them
that there are simple...I mean two simple ways,
but practical, that is you try to publish
at least two papers in journals in a year.
And second thing is, you have two projects at a time.
Because some people are not taking project,
even now IIT not...I think the...only about...
not even half these faculty are having projects.
So, with the projects, I told them
"You will have...you can buy equipment,
computing experimental equipment
or computing resources
and then you can also have students."
See IIT has limited number of students,
but if you have project, you can have a student
on the project and he can do M. S. and Ph. D.
So...and there were some other freedoms also,
you can travel, and all that.
So, have two projects at a time
and...so this advice was...
was followed by Sujith and Satyanarayana,
Sujith has done very well, he...he two years ago
he got that Mid-Career Research Award.
Ok IIT has the awards you know.
That...the initial award and then,
Mid-Career and then senior people get
some Lifetime Award and all that.
So he got that award, and he has even published
more than 100 papers by now,
I had just told him,
that "Try to publish hundred by...try that
target of 100 before you become 50."
So, he...he came and told me
the other day that he he had achieved that.
And Satyanarayana also has done very well in...
he is very well known...abroad,
and in the country also.
And he is now the...almost he is the leading...Principal Coordinator
for the 50 crore centre on combustion research.
There is a big...it...it will be inaugurated I think soon. Ok.
You might have heard by the side of Aero Department, Yes.
There is the Centre for Combustion Studies,
so, he has been given that project,
and so, they are doing...they have done,
then they have been editor of journals,
and so they have...both of them have done very well.
So that's what I tell you know, our younger people also
when I met them that, because some people say,
"No we will not do project," and all that.
But I tell them, "Projects have their own..."
even projects help the Institute, and we solve problems
which are needed for the country and all that. Ok.
So I have been telling that,
and that was...they followed and it is
having a seen this way.
Now, Sujith is...has...recently you might have see in
last Sunday’s Indian Express that,
Sujith and his students, they have...
they have been studying this combustion instability.
And now, they have developed a scheme,
or a method...that how to...because
sometimes, this instability sets in, and engine stops.
To prevent that, they do all sorts of...
they...I mean, they do use it under efficient yeah...
under capacity and all that.
But now they are, they have given a...yeah, they are coming up
with a scheme that it can be...warning can be given.
Warning can be given, it came in last Sunday
Indian Express and all that,
and so, of course, they are going to have patent and all that.
So those things, they are coming,
that is we should develop new things
and then make patents and all that. Ok.
So before we end, anything else that, you would like to say
to the people who are watching this?
So, about your having had such a long career
in the department, and looking back,
anything that you would like to say to us?
Yeah that is what...
yeah I think you had asked something,
now, the working together...
yeah [Reads From Paper] see...yeah working...that was...the anything
[Reads From Paper] I would like to have accomplish
[Reads From Paper] accomplishments of department. What happened was,
that yeah since 1990s and so on, the funds are available.
That is...when you propose projects and all that,
so you can get big funds for equipment,
for computing resources and so on,
but to make a mark, what was...
what is needed is, to have a group. Yes sir.
And the interdisciplinary group.
So, CFD centre we started,
and so, as I have mentioned 25-30 staff members
from various departments would come together,
discuss together, and see, somebody working
in metallurgy, he may have some problem,
but same thing can be...same...
that method can be used in some other.
So, that was that...what they call
cross fertilisation of ideas and all that.
So that was going on,
and it went on for some some years.
Similarly there is the there is this...this Comptech
Comptech there are people from Civil, Metallurgy and others.
Then, the CFEAD there was a centre called
Centre for Finite Element Analysis and Design. Ok.
CFEAD. It was in civil line,
but there were people from aero
and other people were there,
even Tata Consultancy had given them...
some students used to come.
That is, they used to depute their staff
to do M. Tech., and all that here.
And there was one MSRC, Material Science Research Centre. Yeah.
So these we are bringing together
from Metallurgy, Chemistry and other places.
But somehow in 2004, something happened
and the IIT was trying to say...
yeah of course, I was I think I was mentioning in something
which you...you felt you could not do before retirement,
I think that is the point I was...
that question is what I had written down this.
So, 2004 this idea somehow it came,
that the centre should be attached to the departments. Ok.
2004, and I have...
I thought that was not a good idea,
but after I retired in 2005 first time,
of course, second, then re-employed
and first time at the age of 62.
So, 2005, I could not prevent that.
And then these centres were attached.
CFD centre were attached,
Mechanical Engineering Department
Comptech was attached to Aero,
MSRC was attached to Chemistry,
and CFEAD was...they...they didn't like this idea,
so they closed, I think they...they said...
they...they...they they sort of...people said you know ok,
we...we will do our own.
But what happened with this attachment,
the interdiscipline nature stopped. Yes.
So now, CFD Centre in Mechanical Engineering,
the people from Chemical and all the
other departments are not coming,
he said, "It is department of Mechanical,"
and Mchanical Department says
"Let us have...it is a part of the department."
So, it is like one laboratory.
So, funding was also gone,
Comptech also these people from Civil, Metallurgy
they went away, they...they same MSRC,
which is all other people,
Metallurgy and other people
they had lot of costly equipment,
they...they have gone away.
So, this was not, this is...this I felt was
not a good thing, I felt, I...even now I feel sad about it,
but now of course some new centres are coming up.
This Combustion Centre is coming up,
and then I think Biotechnology also they have some...
so, I only wish that these centres
and interdisciplinary work blossoms in IIT. Sure, thank you.
Ok, and that's all sir, so
Yeah. we come to the end of our interview.
Kumaran Sathasivam: You had mentioned something about the FRP Centre, sir.
FRP had become Comptech, FRP in 1997,
because to give it more importance,
it was made Composite Technology Centre, Comptech.
that also see, Comptech had people from Aero,
people from Civil, people from Metallurgy,
I know they were there,
but now once the centre was attached to Aero Department,
it became...the funding was small
and also other people said "It is Aero."
So, it was. So the interdisciplinary nature was not there.
That interdisciplinary nature was...
so this was...now anyway some...it's coming,
new centres are coming, this Combustion Centre
they are Mechanical Engineering people, Aero people,
and maybe Chemical Engineering, they...they will be there...there.
so that is needed...interdisciplinary studies,
our way of working is important,
because people come together
and they can do bigger projects.
See what happens is IIT Kanpur,
they had some Professor Biswas,
of course he has now left
and he has become Director of IIT Guwahati.
But Professor Biswas, Professor Muraleedhar,
Professor Muraleedhar, Professor Eshwar,
but of course, he has also gone to IIT Hyderabad,
The Head of Mechanic...
But there some of them, they came together
at IIT Kanpur, and then they developed course.
See to develop a course,
you need a team,
and you need also some ideas,
because different people have different ideas,
so what they have...what they had achieved was,
that BARC, BARC had developed some code. Ok.
Now, these people develop a parallel code,
and then they would compare.
See the...so that is called...I mean
in computational fluid dynamics, that also is needed.
You give it to two teams,
and they develop course,
and then they...inter-code comparisons,
and there will be some other things.
See, how they are tackling some of the computational difficulties,
so that was, of course they are also...
these people have now...they have gone
to different places, Muraleedhar is there,
but Eshwaran has gone to Hyderabad,
Biswas has gone to... Ok.
But that is needed.
So people coming over together,
then only they can do good codes.
See, abroad some of the professors
and others are developing codes,
they are forming companies,
that is because they...they have
they...they work together and yeah,
so that is what is...interdisciplinary...working is needed. Ok.
Yeah. Ok, that's all sir.
So, thank you so much for spending your time,
No, it is ok. Ok, thank you.
- Contribute
to the Centre -
Monetary
Support - Digital
Material
Dr. C. Mohan in conversation with Prof. R. Nagarajan
Good morning, Mohan. Welcome to Heritage Centre.
Thank you, Nags.
So, we will mainly talk about your days here at IIT
even you are a student,
but before we do that just give us a little bit of a history of
how you got into IIT and then what you have been
doing since you left IIT. Ok.
Interestingly enough even though my
mom’s first cousin Professor V. Rama Murthy
was a faculty member in Mechanical Engineering.
Somehow I didn’t know about IIT until
I was about to apply for pre-university course
and then one of my high school best buddies said hey,
you should go join Loyola College because they have this
coaching for a month before the
JEE for IIT and I am like what is IIT?
So, anyway, that is how it started out and then of course,
my parents said why do you want to go to Chennai
and study there when we have set up shop in Vellore?
For purely the kids education.
So, then finally, my dad says ok whichever comes first
Voorhees College in Vellore or Loyola in Chennai
I should take it up
and luckily for me the Loyola College one came up
and so, at that time it was just one month, one hour
each day in the morning before regular classes
Math, Physics, Chemistry being covered in these things.
So, that is how I wound up getting
to become aware of IIT and then you know
get prepared in terms of the JEE.
And, it was like sheep mentality at the time right
based on what rank you got you know the
top choice was Electronics, next was Chemical.
So, my rank was such that
I went into that not because of any particular
interest in Chemical Engineering as supposed to
some other branch of Engineering.
But, then as many people know when I was
starting my second year, it is 1973 is when the
IBM mainframe came as a gift to IIT Madras,
from West Germany and I got hooked
and the rest is kind of history in the sense of
my spending all my spare time and more
hanging around in the Computer Centre
and I had the benefit of IIT letting even undergraduates
who had from a curriculum perspective
no business going anywhere near the computer. Right.
Unlimited access so.
And since I left IIT in ‘77 of course,
with all the 4 years of heavy duty learning about computers
and such I had made up my mind
especially starting from the third year
that I was going to do a Ph.D in Computer Science.
But between the beginning of the second year
and the third year
I thought I will do a Ph.D in management science
because to begin with I was using lot of these
application packages that were
available on that mainframe system.
But, then there was some special feature
I was trying to use in a simulation package
where the software kept crashing and that is when
sitting at home in the summer of 1974, I was debugging this
software and that is when I said the macho thing to do
is to do a Ph.D in Computer Science
and get into hardcore nuts and bolts low level
hardware as well as software kind of thing.
But, I still graduated only in the software space
in terms of my Ph.D work.
I didn’t really do any hardware oriented work.
So, and after graduation of course,
from my Ph.D I joined IBM research
and I have been there ever since 38 years of being part of the
IBM research division. Right.
Primarily in San Jose,
but I did spend about 32 months in Bangalore
as the IBM India Chief Scientist and also
for 1 year I did a sabbatical in Paris
at a French Computer Science Research Institute.
It was from 1998 to 99. Ok.
So, going back to your days at on campus,
what are your some of your best memories
you know maybe take it year wise first year, what you were?
First year I was more of a normal guy
in the sense that when I joined Loyola College
for my pre-university in 1971
that was the first time I started playing tennis.
As opposed to during my high school days in Vellore
playing cricket and being a member of the Vellore Cricket Club.
So, when I came to IIT in 72
that first year I regularly went to OAT movies,
I used the tennis courts here and so on.
But, once the second year started and I got sucked into
Computer Science related stuff as a side activity,
it began to dominate my psyche so much
that I stopped doing anything else.
I didn’t even hang around as much with my own batchmates
let alone others in the hostel and also in terms of hostel
I was in Alaknanda to begin with and I should have
as a Chemical Engineering guy gone to Godavari in 70.
You had the 1 plus 4 model right?
Yeah, right exactly, but at the time they
did not have enough space in Godavari.
So, some of us got sent to Saraswati,
but then from the third year onwards I was in Godavari.
So, I did you know spent some amount of time
with my batchmates and others in the hostel,
but really not the normal kind of time
that others would have done.
Because I got to know more of the Master students
who were in Computer Science
because when the Computer Centre was started in 73
they started with the Masters program and also the PhD program,
but undergraduate degrees in Computer Science
didn't begin anywhere in India to my knowledge until
late 70s early 80s.
So, of course, the campus and you know
Mardi Gras all those sorts of things
have left a lasting impression on me.
Mardi Gras is now called Saarang yeah.
And, also you know being close enough to my parents
who are living in Vellore just 80–85 miles I wound up
as a Tamil guy spending my entire pre-Ph.D days life in
Tamil Nadu except for holidays going to some other parts of India.
But, also I didn’t learned Hindi in school because
by the time I would have normally had
Hindi education in high school
the Tamil Nadu Government went from being
Congress Government to DMK and so, the
three language formula became two-language formula,
but my mother still thought I should learn Hindi and so
I had to go to Dakshin Bharat Hindi Prachar Sabha to learn.
And, some of that knowledge I could have kept up
while I was in IIT if only I had hung around enough with the Right.
my classmates or even others that were more into
Hindi speaking, but I just didn’t.
Of course, we are just had our own
vernacular rate we had that campus.
Oh yeah of course, of course, that is true too.
But, I do think that you know the
whole cosmopolitan student body is a the big plus.
Yeah, yeah definitely.
No question about that.
But, in fact, interestingly enough it is when I went to
America to Austin Texas for my Ph.D that I actually
started feeling very bad about having not having kept up my
Hindi knowledge because there the Indian community was
so small that everybody automatically assumed that
everybody will know Hindi. Right.
So, and also even movies that were being shown over
there were Hindi movies with no subtitles to begin with.
So, I actually tried hard to revive my [laughter] Hindi knowledge,
but then soon after the subtitles in English started coming.
So, I was less motivated then.
So, anyway that is the.
How was your workshop experience, sir?
That was pretty tough, right because
at that time in the first year 50 percent of the time
every other week we spent entirely in the workshop
and in the second year one day of every week
we spent in the workshop.
So, it did you know, make life here very different
compared to some of my contemporaries
in other engineering colleges and so on
or even in other IITs for that matter .
But, I do not know whether in my case it left
any lasting impression in the sense of being very hands on guy
because even you know much later in life at home and so on
my wife complains that I am not doing
enough of the things myself.
Like the professionals do it that's why.
But as an engineer I suppose
and I am supposed to be expected to be more hands
on than I have wound up being.
Yeah, just supervise.
The other subject lot of people remember is of course
drawing, Engineering Drawing
which also used to be pretty painful and,
but you are ok with the drawing.
Yeah, you see it is been so long that some of these things
have sort of been being
sent out of the cache in my head you know.
So, so, you know it is already what 42 plus years
since I graduated 1977 is when I
Finished my Bachelor’s Degree.
So, lot more things have come into my immediate attention,
scope and so on so, some of those memories are not as vivid,
but these days you know it is interesting when I look
at the WhatsApp group of my classmates, some of the guys
were able to recall even dorm room numbers and the roll number
and such things so vividly and they are also talking about
various workshop employees
and so on extremely well and so, I feel bad.
Is my brain so messed up compared to these
other guys at least in terms of memory? lost memories.
make up names and.
No, but then there are these other guys
who are also you know at times pointing out some
errors in this recollection and so on.
So, it is quite amazing how some people have such selective
Sure. memory about some of these sorts of things
and in my case that is not the situation.
So. Any memories about the department?
Chemical Engineering all I remember is
you know Ananth teaching Thermodynamics
and of course, later on long after
I left he became the Director
and then I am forgetting Gopinath was there.
Was there a Govinda Rajalu?
Govinda Rajalu, I don’t remember.
No, see again you know in my case I am a bad example,
right because I was essentially trying to get away
with the minimal amount of work in Chemical Engineering,
so much so that my parents when they noticed
how much time I was spending in
in the Computer Centre and even my name C. Mohan was
interpreted as Computer Mohan.
My parents thought that I might even flunk
my Chemical Engineering with all the enthusiasm
I was showing on Computer Science.
So, in that sense I do not have as much of an attachment to the
department in the sense of
after I left coming back and interacting with the
staff members, but there was one Chemical Engineering professor
who had become a Computer Science person
and that was Professor Nagarajan your name sake,
but he was an older gentleman of course.
So, he was one of the few faculty members in
in Computer Science after the computer came here the
mainframe that encouraged my craziness of
spending so much time on something
that wasn’t supposed to be my focus at IIT .
The major one being of course, Professor C. R. Muthu Krishnan.
Who was one of the two faculty members who came from
IIT, Kanpur to start the Computer Centre and the
other one being Professor Mahabala.
So, Muthu was ultimately my
project advisor even for my B.Tech project.
So, even that project I didn’t do in Chemical Engineering.
So, in so many ways I was the oddball guy
that was nominally a Chemical Engineering student,
but in fact, I wasn’t. Did you get into trouble in the department because of that?
No, actually strangely enough
they even permitted me to do this B.Tech project in Computer Science.
So, in that sense I got lucky and so in many ways
I used to feel originally that unlike the
IIT Kanpur administration based on the fact that
Kanpur was started with US assistance
gave the students lot more flexibility.
So, the only thing I could have done in a formal sense
in IIT Madras as an undergraduate student
in the area of Computer Science was in the
eighth or the ninth semester as a Mathematics option
I could have taken Fortran programming as a course
and that would have been the only formal
grade qualifying entry I would have had in my mark sheet.
But then since I had started programming
in the third semester this didn’t make.
Because things are very different now as I am
sure you know you know there is so much flexibility now.
Chemical Engineering student can get a B.Tech in Chemical Engineering
and an M.Tech in Data Science you know integrated
5 year program I see
or you can do a B.Tech in Chemical Engineering with a
minor in Computer Science.
So, there is just large number of ways in which- Yeah.
So, we didn’t didn’t have a notion of minor at all, right during?
No, we didn’t. And even in your time?
No. You are about 3 years, 81.
Yeah. 4 years junior to me, right.
So, yeah definitely I mean it is just that I was here at a time when
I suppose because of the West German idea of
what undergraduates should do it was a
more strict kind of way of deciding who gets to do what.
But, at the same time I was also extremely pleased
that not only the Computer Centre administration
but even the rest of the admin people in IIT Madras
allowed somebody like me to
have unlimited access to the mainframe.
And so, to that extent I am forever grateful to
the people in IIT Madras that let guys like me exist
and not get penalized in any sense.
In fact, I was quite surprised when I finally
managed to get out with a 7.5 GPA
is that the term or CPA? CGPA.
Now now I think it was originally credit point average. Yeah.
Yeah and that was just barely making it in first class. Right.
7.5 was the minimum we had to get to get a first class
and so, I was ok with that.
Although you know lots of other people obviously
got much higher CPAs than I what I got,
but the saving grace for me was once I started doing
Computer Science I managed to get out with a I think 3. 95 out of 4.
No only one course where I got the B
dragged me down to a none 4.2 grade point average.
So, yeah that is about it.
What was the food like?
I mean what is your memories of the-
A food, I don’t recall a whole lot.
I mean again I suppose I was not that much
hung up about food and such.
I mean I was a vegetarian and I am still a vegetarian.
So, I was ok with it.
I mean even now I am not so particular about
what I eat and such as long as
it fills my stomach I am more or less ok.
There aren't too many things that I say I just can’t
I I won’t eat because I don’t like the taste or whatever.
More and more of course, you know certain things
I am avoiding just because it doesn’t seem to suit me physiologically,
but other than that life in IIT, I mean I got so crazy at
one point that I even avoided going to the OAT
movies thinking I should spend even
that time learning more about some Computer Science geeky things.
Do you have any regrets about your time at IIT, Madras?
Not really the the only thing I could presumably have done
better is as I was saying earlier kept up my Hindi knowledge
and gotten to know a bit more about people
that came from other parts of India
to learn more about their states
and their culture and so on.
Interestingly enough it was for the first time in Austin,
the first summer over there, summer of 78 that some of the
Gujarati women there dragged me on to the stage to perform
in Raas and Bhangra and such things
and I had never been on stage in my time at IIT
and even in high school,
the school I went to was not one of those sorts of
all round kinds of schools in Vellore,
the Krishnaswamy Mudaliar High School.
So, it was more academic focus that was dinned into me.
So, in that sense you know even my roommate in Austin
for a couple of years was a Maharashtrian guy.
So, my- if you like appreciation
for other parts of India, expanded during my time
in the US than while I was here.
Even though as I was saying at the beginning
I did spend summer vacations in Baroda
and Calcutta and places like that.
But, I didn’t really spend too much time on the cultural side
and artistic side and things like that.
So, in that sense I didn’t have if you like
kind of more all round kind of appreciation for non-technical.
You are a Computer nerd.
Yeah, especially during IIT days,
but even before you know it’s not like I tried to pursue,
I don’t know, Carnatic music
or Western music or any of those sorts of things,
but later of course, more because of my wife,
my kids wound up getting all sorts of stuff
forced on them to begin with at least.
And then of course, they started liking it and
so, they went quite a bit into the arts compared
to my own upbringing and so on.
So, as a as a as an ex-IBM or I should
I have to ask you this- Sure.
what parables do you see between IIT Madras
and IBM as an organization, do you see any?
Interesting, I had not thought about.
I mean I don’t know maybe from a leadership viewpoint or from-
See of course, the difference is one is a commercial
organization in the case of IBM and of course,
since in my case at least I have been all my life
in the IBM Research Division in many ways that’s like
being in academia and of course, you are a great example of a
person who is spanned both sides.
In my case in a formal sense I have not been a
faculty member anywhere although for the last three years
and continuing into the next three years,
I have this position as a distinguished visiting professor at
one of China’s pre-eminent universities namely Tsinghua University.
So, in terms of IIT of course,
the great thing that has happened long after I left
is the establishment of the IITM Research Park
and the increased focus in faculty members also getting involved in
trying to get some of their research output
getting commercialized and so on.
So, in in such ways you could say that
there is more similarity now between
let’s say IIT Madras and IBM research people
because as research people we have had to also have our challenge,
we have had to face the challenge of doing
technology transfer of the research ideas into IBM products.
So, in some ways that’s like academics
who are doing research work, trying to make their ideas
see the light of day and so,
now there is more such similarity
if you like between IBM and IIT Madras.
I don’t know if you have some other kinds of things in mind.
No, I think you know I I just think they are about
top class organizations.
Yeah of course, that that’s definitely the case Yeah.
independent of the its academic focus or a
product kind of focus or trying to move the state of the art
in a dramatic way in certain dimensions and so on. Right.
So, of course, you received your distinguished
Alumnus Award a few years ago. 2003.
2003. Yeah.
What was your I mean reaction
when you first learned that you were receiving the award
and then you actually received the award
what what were your memories?
I was quite pleased obviously, you know it is like
nice to hear from your alma mater that they think
you have done something you know worthy of that kind of
honour being bestowed on you,
but I was unsure whether the nominal department
that I was attached to namely Chemical Engineering
would feel excited about this or not because
I didn’t really continue that area of work or study and so on,
after I left the campus.
But, then again I thought Computer Science people
might not feel they have any special attachment
to you especially because by that time I think if my
memory serves me right both Mahabala and Muthu Krishnan
were no longer regular faculty members here.
Muthu might have been still an adjunct faculty member,
I am not sure and I did not know too many of the other people
that long after I left gotten into Computer Science.
So, if my memory serves me right actually somebody from
Chemical Engineering came and handed me the-
Yeah, that’s a tradition that the Head of the Department
from which you have graduated has to read your citation and stuff. Yeah.
So, it was nice.
Of course, I would have been even happier had that award
come the previous year because for the first time
we had our reunion that was my Silver Reunion 2002.
So, it did not happen that year even though
the application had been put in by some colleague of mine.
So, that would have been nice because then you know
because at that time unlike now I think the awards used to be
given out during these sorts of reunions in December. Ok.
So, I was thinking wow, wouldn't it have been nice
if you know it was done with about 85 or
so of the 250 graduates
so, 77 year. Yeah, we still announce the awards at the reunion,
but the they are actual giving up the award. I see. I see.
Is in April in on institute.
Yeah so, but of course, because there are lot of my classmates
who are still in Chennai who never even left Chennai in terms of
once I started working and so on moving somewhere else.
So, quite a good number of my classmates
did attend the award function
and so, it was thrilling and my parents also were there
and even my sister came and so on.
So, but my family was not here, meaning my immediate family.
But, they were with me when we had the Silver Reunion.
So, that is the only time in fact, both my kids
and my wife attended the reunions because
they didn’t come for the subsequent 30th, 35th, so on reunions.
And, I myself didn’t attend after the 30th reunion,
the 35th and the 40th ones,
but we are going to have a cruise come
end of March in the US,
whole bunch of people are coming for that.
So, I am looking forward to that.
And how about the IBM fellowship, I mean how was that?
So, that was very nice that happened in 1997.
So, just about 15 years after I joined the companies
when that happened and that was quite a
thrilling thing for me to see
that kind of recognition coming especially
because while it is not a record in terms of the number of years
after one joins the company to get the IBM fellowship,
its less than the average number of years.
So, so in that sense I really felt extremely happy about that especially
since for an IBM-er who has chosen even to this day to be a non-manager
this is like the pinnacle of technical career in IBM to get the IBM fellowship.
So, and I also had more or less stuck to the same area of work
instead of moving even as a technical person to dramatically
different areas as some people do.
And, so, for me that award and the year before
the ACM SIGMOD Innovation Award which is given for database people
were really you know extremely pleasing kinds of
recognition to be offered by the community of
database people across the globe in the case of the
1996 ACM SIGMOD Award in 97 by IBM people,
the immigrant fellowships so.
So, going back to your student days did you have
any run-ins with the administration?
Did you ever get to meet the directors?
I don’t think I had any
slaps on my wrist by administration
because of any bad behaviour or anything.
I might have actually met the Deputy Director,
Professor Sampath used to be the Deputy Director
and he had of course, Electrical Engineering kind of
background having got his Masters at Stanford.
But, in terms of both Professor Ramachandran,
who was the Director when I joined and a few years later
when Professor Pandalai took over,
I am not sure if I even met them once each one.
At least I don’t recall now, although I used to be extremely
active in terms of not just campus kinds of activities,
I was the Secretary of the Computer Club in my fourth year
and the President of the Computer Club in the fifth year.
And, I used to interact with even people outside of IIT
that were big name people in the Computer Science area
people that were considered like pioneers;
Professor Nataraj I mean Colonel Natarajan
whose two kids were juniors of mine here
and who also subsequently came to UT Austin to do their PhDs,
and also professor Narasimhan
who ran on the Computer group in TIFR
and later when this National Centre for
Software and Computer Technologies
was formed it was called NCSDCT.
And, there was Major General Bala Subramanyam
these three people were even though they were not by training
Computer Science people they were one of the they were as
amongst a small number of people who had gotten into
the Computer field in India early on and so
I was in that sense very active even though
I wasn’t in a formal sense a Computer Science person.
And, so, in that sense I did, you know,
network a lot and things like that which all helped me later on
and also made me feel in many ways attached to India.
Even though IBM as a company had left India in 1978,
at the same time that Coca Cola left, and IBM
didn’t come back to India until 1992 and even then it came back
as a joint venture with the Tata’s.
But even during that 78 to 92 period,
almost on every trip I made to India, I tried to go give talks
both at universities as well as in various commercial establishments.
And, so, I kept up my contacts with the Computer
community in particular in India during my entire professional career.
And of course, it all became even more serious
when in June 2006 I came to India as the
IBM India Chief Scientist, a position they created
which didn’t exist before and and initially
it was supposed to be for 24 months
but then they extended it for 8 more months.
So, until January, 2009, I was based in Bangalore
and I took it upon myself during that period to not only
go around colleges big ones,
but even small ones and also to go to other companies
and talk about long term technical careers
and how they are important for us to move beyond
doing mundane work to you know,
move of the food chain and do more innovative work
and things like that and establish the notion of a
technical ladder and not make everybody think
if they do not become managers
they haven’t made it in life.
So, in your graduating class
how many went abroad for higher studies? What percent of?
My recollection is that out of the 250 or so,
out of which strangely enough there were only three women
maybe about one-fourth went abroad.
Later on of course, even some of the other people showed up,
but of course, that has changed dramatically
from what I gather a lot. 100 percent.
Yeah. So, that is a good thing and, but then that concern
I had was and I used to talk about this can India become an
innovation superpower because this idea of giving
such a presentation came up because
the UC Santa Cruz people had a South Asian kind of program
and they were asking people to come
and talk about India related topics
and this happened during my India tenure in Bangalore.
So, my point was even if the brain drain is not happening,
does that mean that these people that would have
otherwise gone abroad are they still pursuing an academic
career in terms of at least getting degrees like Masters and PhD
are or they just merely going into the professional
career path or as it used to happen even during my time
a good percentage of these people go in for MBAs
at IIMs and then they no longer even work as technical people. Right.
They become management material.
So, I felt that it probably was a problem for both
the foreign countries that used to benefit from
Indians going abroad as well as India because
people just had these easy to get jobs
especially when IT became so dominant in the
Indian scene even non-Computer Science
background people were able to get IT jobs.
I felt that in some sense it didn’t help
anybody that not enough of the people
who are pursuing higher studies and doing research.
I don’t know what your.
I think there is there is a fine balance you have to strike
somewhere I think maybe right now it’s too low.
But, was that like a scientific process for selecting universities,
you know I remember this tapping?
was a was a very very systematic exercise.
The students used to get together and divide up the Universities and. No.
So, in my time there wasn’t this notion of people going
and writing GRE and coming back and recalling
what the questions were and then preparing this
whatever this binder kind of thing, I didn’t even know
that that was being done after I left.
I don’t know after how long after I left
and that this had become like a way in
which a lot of the people here prepared for-
Actually what I am talking about is selection of the university.
No, no I I understand.
So, so this particular thing I didn’t know about,
but I also found out unlike in my time that subsequently
there was this attempt to divvy up who applies to which university.
To my knowledge in my time there was no such thing.
So, the level of sophistication if you like of trying to make sure
that the the top rankers don’t wind up applying to gazillion
universities and they all give them admission.
And then the each one is able to go to only one university in the end
and then they the process mess up the lives for the
sort of the next ring kind of students,
I don’t think that level of sophistication was applied in
my time for people to
try to make it a win-win for at least a significant
number of people in the upper ranks if you like.
So, I was- when I later on found out about all that I was like wow,
these guys have made it into an art form how to-
A science not even.
But then I also at the same time started hearing
from some of the US University people, meaning faculty members
that they had come to know about this and
so, they stopped giving importance to the GREs course of
especially people from institutions like IIT Madras
and maybe the other IITs also and they started
relying more and more on the reference letters from the faculty here
as being more reliable indicators of how good these people are.
You mentioned that there were hardly any female students Yeah.
when you were here.
So, how did that affect you after you graduated?
Well, I don’t know about after graduation,
but during the time in contrast to what the story was at
IIT Madras I used to feel very envious of the
guys across the street in Guindy Engineering,
where if my memory shows me right in all of Madras University
that was the only Engineering College where women were admitted.
So, they had something like 50 women in their
batch that came in in 72 whereas,
we had 3 women and so, I was like this is unfair.
I don’t think it affected me in any way seriously.
No, but I also like I said I got too engrossed in
all this Computer Science thing
so, I was not pursuing in any romantic way any of these women.
So, had I been you know motivated differently
maybe I would have felt even-
So, you are romancing the silicon so-
Yeah, not even the silicon more software right
because I wasn’t really a hardware kind of guy.
So, yeah so, and I was quite crazy in many ways like
that even when I went to,
I remember one time to Baroda for my
Summer Internship to the refinery in Baroda.
I still did it as a Chemical Engineer guy, believe it or not.
One day I went to Ahmadabad, instead of spending the
day sightseeing I went to the library there and started looking at
what they have in terms of Computer Science books and such.
So, in that in many ways like that it was quite
an abnormal case.
Did you have an industry tour when you were student?
Did you go? No.
Like All India.
I don’t even recall such a thing being done.
There was one yeah yeah. Did you have it?
Really? I didn’t even know. So, we went to Goa and supposedly to
Chemical factories which we never went near,
but yeah we went all over the place.
Ok, somehow I don’t recall my making a conscious
decision not to go on such a thing,
so, but one thing that I do remember ok.
So, that is in going back to one of your earlier questions.
I was in the Air Force Wing of NCC and I also
I think that might have been during
my pre-university day in Loyola.
What was the other thing?
National Service Core, NSC.
So, I took part in that too.
So, as part of this NCC Air Force Wing in IIT,
we were taken on a camp trip to Bangalore
and as part of that I forget now how long it was
10 days or whatever stay in the
Madras Engineering Service or some
such unit of the Army I think.
That’s where in their bunkers or
whatever is where we were put up,
we were given a joyride.
in an aircraft.
So, that is the only time I had ever been on an aircraft
until I was flying from here to Delhi to
Tehran to Paris to New York to Austin. Wow.
On my trip out of India for the first time
and I had never gone abroad also.
So, for me all this was like totally
different kind of experience.
And, but at the same time I should say that when I
was going to Austin all I knew in terms of even
Texas as a whole was based on the movies
I saw here in OAT right, western movies.
And so, I was expecting Austin to be like any other city
in Texas and it was such a pleasant surprise to go there
and find that Austin is so different – hill country, greenery, river, Yeah.
non-redneck kind of place because it was primarily
at the time a university town and a capital of the state.
We just spent 3 days there to the end of December early there.
Wow, nice.
So, so in many such ways for me the IIT life
and what it brought about in terms of my future and so on
those are extremely pleasant memories and
things that I appreciate a lot.
And, I constantly talk about not just IIT by the way.
Whenever I see Germans, especially Germans
who come from the western part of Germany
I don’t forget to acknowledge what that country
did to my career and future and so on.
In particular, I remember the German Minister
for Economic Cooperation I think there is a
photo of that person in the the. Collection.
You have in the Heritage Centre,
he in his remarks during the inauguration of the
Computer Centre which happened a few months
after the actual operational usage of the Computer Centre started.
He said not too many
German, West German Universities at that time
could boast of having such a machine.
Even though, when we now look back its crazy
this machine had 256 K of memory
and it took something like 7 to 8 hours for
a compilation to be done of the program
you had to punch in cards and. All FORTRAN, right?
Yeah. So, but the fact that West Germans
you know didn't give priority to all their universities
before donating machines to institutions abroad
is something that, at least in my life
came at the right time and made a huge difference
as to what I chose to pursue as a result of my exposure
starting from my second year to that mainframe. Right.
So, we should probably conclude. Sure, thank you.
Thanks for taking the time and thanks to Kumaran
and the others for giving me this opportunity to talk about
and reminisce about my past year.
Thank you.
Thanks Mohan.
- Contribute
to the Centre -
Monetary
Support - Digital
Material
Prof. R. Natarajan in conversation with Prof. T. Sundararajan
A very good morning, sir.
You are my teacher, Head of the Department,
Director and research mentor also.
It’s my great pleasure to be interacting with you
and talk to you about the good old times at IIT Madras.
So, you had done your undergraduate education at
University College, Bangalore followed by
Prof. Natarajan: Yes. Prof. Sundararajan: Master's degree in IISc,
Prof. Natarajan: Yes. Prof. Sundararajan: and then another Master's and Ph.D.
from University of Waterloo in 1970.
So when did you join IIT Madras, sir?
September of 1970.
I had come here on a vacation,
Prof. Sundararajan: Yes. Prof. Natarajan: and then K. Ramachandran,
he was my teacher at the Indian Institute of Science.
So he asked me if I was interested in a
faculty position at IIT Madras,
because they were just…at that point of time
they were recruiting new faculty members.
So I said, “Yes” and I attended the interview,
and they selected me and then I had a little bit of
an issue whether to join…I could have…could have
you know pack up and
come back to India, or to go back to Canada
because I had a post-doctoral research fellowship
in Canada at that time.
So I deci…my…of course, obviously,
the influence of parents and so on,
and therefore, I joined IIT Madras,
and I am glad I did
because I’ve had a…1970 to 2000; about 30 years of
active academic service at IIT Madras
which is by all accounts,
one of the best institutions in the whole world.
Not only in India, but also in the whole world.
The…what you have said about
my education and early experience,
a couple of gaps there.
I worked in Tata Power Company for about 6 months,
and then in…in…in Canada again
as a post-doctoral research fellow for about 6 months.
Otherwise my career is complete, as you have mentioned.
Prof. Sundararajan: Yeah. Prof. Natarajan: You know I…I have to say something about you;
you were one of…you have been one of our best students,
and then of course, you went abroad for your Ph.D.,
and when you came back,
I think you fitted very naturally
into the academic system at IIT Madras,
and I know you have been there since…at the time you joined,
but you joined IIT Kanpur first, right?
Prof. Sundararajan: Yes sir, 1985.
Prof. Natarajan: So you joined IIT Kanpur and
and we…we pulled you…you away from Kanpur to…
Prof. Natarajan: and I…I hope that we have [indistinct] Prof. Sundararajan: And in ‘93 I shifted to IIT Madras, sir.
Shifted, okay, and I hoped you have had a satisfactory and…
Prof. Sundararajan: Fantastic time, sir, great time.
Prof. Sundararajan: Yes. Prof. Natarajan: And my complaint against you was
that you take on too much to do.
So, in many, many items we…we would be
afraid to take on all those responsibilities.
Prof. Sundararajan: Yes. Prof. Natarajan: From the beginning…
you know when I joined IIT Madras as I have said,
Dr. A. Ramachandran was the Director,
and we have a natural fit also,
because, he was also interested in curricular matters
in not only delivery of education,
but also in the creation of knowledge.
Therefore, we had a natural fit.
And that relationship also worked very well.
Prof. Sundararajan: Yes. Sir, before 1970
did you have an opportunity to visit IIT Madras, sir?
No, not really, I didn’t come here.
Prof. Sundararajan: But your brother studied here in IIT Madras.
Yes, but much earlier than that, probably the second batch.
So, ‘60 or…to ’63, he was in the 3-year programme,
Prof. Sundararajan: Yes. Prof. Natarajan: so I did visit IIT Madras.
Prof. Sundararajan: Okay. And…the reasons for my joining the Institute;
I had a preference for an academic career,
and as I mentioned earlier,
we had heard a lot about IIT Madras,
except that we were understaffed as usual,
and the facilities had not been established,
therefore, the people who came much earlier,
for example, the faculty members who are there now,
they owe a debt of gratitude to the
administration and the funding agencies,
before they joined.
They probably think that…that everything was
ready and operational by the time we joined. Not at all,
as…as you are talking about my brother,
they were staying in a hostel outside the Institute
when the campus was being built.
Prof. Sundararajan: Built. Prof. Natarajan: So I have a small grouse there.
If you look at the AICTE requirements,
because I have been a regulator,
regulations, a lot of things have to be in place,
both academic as well as extracurriculars,
stay arrangements and a whole lot of things.
And the…for the faculty families, the support infrastructure
before the students come in and start…starting their education.
However, even now,
Institutes have started, announcements are made,
and then the campus is getting prepared,
that is really not at all a good policy.
What you lose is about 3 years.
It…because it takes about 3 years to set up a campus.
A real case in example is the IIT in Hyderabad;
at the moment they have a very nice campus,
but when they started,
and I was the Chairman of a 3 member committee
to decide on the location of the IIT in Hyderabad.
There were three options and
we chose what we thought was the best option.
But the point is, when they joined,
it was a temporary campus,
whereas now, it is a very well designed…
probably one of the best campuses.
So you are…the…the students who join,
they are deprived of a whole lot of
necessary and desirable infrastructure.
Even…even today, you must…you must have seen
in the newspaper that the faculty shortage
in each of the IITs is about 30 percent or 35 percent.
So that is at…you…you are
deceiving the students, who have joined you
in the hope that…that…that they will get wholesome education.
Prof. Sundararajan: Yes. Prof. Natarajan: So that…that is part of the issue.
Prof. Natarajan: So… Prof. Sundararajan: Then IIT Madras also, the initial thing…
Prof. Sundararajan: the classes, were they held outside IIT, sir?
Prof. Sundararajan: In AC Tech or something?
Prof. Sundararajan: Initially in IIT Madras? Prof. Natarajan: Yes, yes,
at IIT Madras, quite right,
It took a long time for them to establish the departments.
But they had an advantage; that German
academic faculty…m…m…members from 5-6 universities,
they were called the Madras Committee,
they had a Madras Committee at that time
and they designed the syllabus,
they designed the important infrastructure,
and, at that time, because of the importance
that Germany gave for working by hand,
Prof. Sundararajan: Yeah. Prof. Natarajan: or the practical knowledge and experience.
In fact, they used to have I don’t...I don’t think
you know about it also, they had
Prof. Natarajan: an academic week and a technical infrastructure week Prof. Sundararajan: I went through that, sir.
Prof. Sundararajan: In fact, in… Prof. Natarajan: You went through that?
Prof. Sundararajan: Yeah. So we had one week of…academic week Prof. Natarajan: Oh, great!
and then next week was workshop week.
Whole week you know, five and half days;
Monday to Saturday, half a day, it was a workshop.
So we went through that system.
A lot of emphasis on practical work,
Prof. Sundararajan: laboratory work and so on, Prof. Natarajan: Yes.
and 5 years of programme.
So what is your impression about 5 years to 4 year, sir?
Has it diluted the programme or?
No, the 4 years was made essentially because of the fact
that in the higher secondary…
or the secondary or intermediate for example,
they learned a lot of maths and physics and chemistry,
which need not be repeated.
Even today as you know, there is quite a bit of repetition
in terms of physics, chemistry, mathematics,
although workshop and drawing were different.
I think it was a good idea to reduce the…
because we also wanted compatibility between
the US system and the…the…the Indian system,
whereas, the German system and the Indian system;
many, many differences because
the basic degree was a 5 -year diplom.
Prof. Sundararajan: Diplom. Prof. Natarajan: Yeah, but because of commercial and the other interests,
they also fell in line with the international practices.
So there, they have a 4-year undergraduate programme.
Sir, one more thing is
initially as it was an annual examination system, sir?
Prof. Natarajan: Right, right. Prof. Sundararajan: So, like this university,
and later on the semester system came.
Prof. Sundararajan: So did you feel that Prof. Natarajan: more than
going from annual to semester was an improvement or…
Prof. Sundararajan: what is your opinion about that? Prof. Natarajan: Internationally, as you know,
we have the semester system.
In…recently I was in an advisory committee,
to convert the conventional engineering programme from a
semester system to a trimester system.
This was an institution
which was famous for…it is in Bombay,
is famous for their management programme.
They felt that they could follow the same practice,
but then, I was one of the principal advisers
who suggested that it will not work in engineering.
The reason why the annual was changed
to semester was because,
continuous evaluation, and you could have the tests
and semester examinations
and also more subjects can be managed.
If it is an annual thing, it will be more difficult,
and the other consideration…
taking the students’ interests into consideration was
that students study only before the examinations,
they do not have a continuous study and evaluation.
I think the semester system is probably the ideal;
neither the annual system nor the trimester system.
Trimester systems used to be suitable for
the management programmes
where you have to study a large number of subjects.
Sir, when we were students, the emphasis was more
on the undergraduate programmes,
but slowly the emphasis seems to have shifted
towards PG programmes and research.
So what is your observation on this, sir?
Here I will tell you,
you see the number of undergraduates you can handle,
but the load…more important than the teaching load is the
marking of grading of both
term papers as well as the final exam papers.
Now, the alumni of IIT Madras
seem to have a very strong opinion about this,
I will tell you the reason also for this:
They felt that the undergraduate students is
too valuable a programme
to dilute or reduce in magnitude or
increase the emphasis on postgraduate programmes.
In fact, a group of…I was in Canada at that time,
a group of alumni met us
because we were from the same Institute, senior alumni,
they said, “For god's sake do not
remove or dilute the undergraduate programme.”
Prof. Sundararajan: Okay. Prof. Natarajan: The reason for that; the IITs are known
more for the undergraduate programmes
than for the postgraduate programmes
including the Ph.D. programmes.
I happened to meet a US faculty member,
fairly senior person in Dubai at a conference.
And, he said, “I know I have seen…”
he was…he was a…he was an American,
and he said, “Thank you for feeding
good undergraduate students to us
as course…as graduate students.
Without them we will not be able to do our research.”
So, he also suggested that our undergraduate programme…
and we also know that they are the star products
for many reasons. You…you get good quality students
and even though we provide them with good education and infrastructure,
they don’t actually value it.
While…and students don’t value it.
We have had the meetings of current and alumni discussions,
and if you ask this…the current students,
“Which do you think is the most important contributor,
significant contributor for your education?” and so on.
They never used to talk about the Institute infrastructure,
nor of the faculty member for whom
they have the least respect.
But, they said it is because of the
interaction among the current students.
What interaction do they have, I would like to find out.
Anyway, you know, that’s a rather tongue in cheek response,
but it is true that you put bright students
who…if…if they want to study very hard
of course, the facilities that are available.
But the interaction among them,
you know that’s why in many of the US universities
you will know that
when they choose the students, they choose a good mix of
students with different capabilities
and different interests and things like that.
So I…I…you know, in fact, every Head of Departments…
at the meeting of the Heads of Department, I used to ask the Heads,
“Which is our most important contribution as an institution?”
It is undergraduate institution.
So, the question was, “When do you make this institution
where the star products, or the postgraduate students,
the graduate students?”
And, there is also the
feeling that we have an inverted pyramid;
the best of school leavers they become graduates,
and the best of graduates of course, go to industry, go abroad.
And, what we get as postgraduate input
is not as good as that of the undergraduates,
and the Ph.D., it is those who couldn’t find job
even after the post-graduation.
They…you know, because of the fellowship, they felt that
this…this was a common perception.
Even now it is there, perception.
But things have changed to some extent, sir, quite a bit.
They…we find that
both at the Master’s level as well as the Ph.D. level,
there are some good students.
I would say 10-20 percent are fairly good,
and of course, Institute as such,
its ranking, and you know whatever
the world sees you know, about the Institute,
the view will be improved only
if we get good publications and
even the…our faculty
who are selected from best among the world,
whatever output is there,
that has to be seen out…in the outside world.
So, undergraduate education alone will not…you know,
of course, it’s a good product, we should not dilute it,
but at the same time I think
research plays a very important role also.
So, what do you feel about the PG students in general, sir?
You know, nationally, I can talk about it.
What is happening is the PG students
you know, you have the best of the undergraduates as I mentioned,
Prof. Sundararajan: Yeah. Prof. Natarajan: they get jobs, industrial jobs
and very few of them are interested in research or teaching.
Of course, they want to get the maximum education
before they start delivering that education to people.
However, at the moment there is a real issue;
employment and employability of the postgraduate students.
As you know when the companies come to the campus,
they are not interested in interviewing the postgraduate students.
First they would like to take a look at the undergraduate students.
This this is a serious issue, and that is why
people like S. Gopalakrishnan formerly of Infosys,
he has set up some incubation centres,
entrepreneurship training and things like that
in Kerala, that’s where he comes from.
And he has given a large amount of money
for these things to be set up.
Now, when I…I was in the IIT many years ago,
there used to be a ranking of the best Asian universities:
Japan, Korea…China was not yet a significant part,
and IIT Madras was almost always in the first three.
And we used to be very proud of that.
The interesting…this is the magazine Asia Week;
they became more and more sophisticated,
and they…when I…they stopped doing it
after the QS and the THE ranking;
the Times Higher Education rankings.
They became famous because that was global,
it was only Asia.
They used to have as one of the parameters,
internet connectivity for student.
So they had become quite…
you know, mature and sophisticated.
And, we always used to come within the first three
and we were very happy, and I had a committee
to look at the reasons why we were not number 1.
Prof. Sundararajan: Number 1. Prof. Natarajan: I believed in rankings
many people do rank and…and I have done some
work on ranking the academic rankings.
And, it is very important to
benchmark your institution with the others
Prof. Natarajan: and the rankings provide an opportunity for doing that. Prof. Sundararajan: Yeah.
Prof. Natarajan: Of course, there are some fraudulent activities. Prof. Sundararajan: Yeah.
You know you take advertisements in our journals and
Prof. Sundararajan: Yeah. Prof. Natarajan: attend our conferences, sponsoring them.
And they get slightly higher ranking.
But however, the methodology itself has become
Prof. Natarajan: very sophisticated. Prof. Sundararajan: Yes, yes.
Prof. Sundararajan: Sir… Prof. Natarajan: So when I became the…
Prof. Natarajan: yes? in…you have been in the Mechanical Department
from 1970 to about 2000 or so.
What changes did you observe
in the department, sir, during this period?
Actually to tell you the truth, not many.
It also means that we had had a certain level of maturity
which need not be changed.
So, a department consists of
Prof. Natarajan: faculty members of different specializations. Prof. Sundararajan: Specialization.
The undergrad, the labs and the
experiences for the undergraduates
and the research infrastructure
as well as the climate for the postgraduates.
More and more what I have seen is that the
younger faculty members, they are not interested in teaching,
they have…basically interested only in research and
activities which promote the publication of journals.
So teaching used to get a very low priority among the
Prof. Sundararajan: Okay Prof. Natarajan: faculty members.
It was very difficult to make them teach new courses,
even though the curriculum was changing…being changed,
keeping with the changing
industrial and research environment elsewhere.
But the faculty members stuck to
their…their own in…individual research,
and also publish or perish was the basis for faculty promotions.
And one of the other factors here is,
you could…you could not even get young faculty members
to take on administrative positions
wardens or members of committees and so on,
because it would detract from their mainstream activity.
I understand even now it is very true.
Is that true now?
No, no there are people
who are interested in administration,
there are people who are not interested,
who would like to concentrate on the research.
So we get all sorts of people, that was not a problem.
Alright, and of course, the…the…the
the kind of that…the…the mix of
topics on which the faculty members work,
they have also changed considerably.
Because, internationally…
and usually people do not want to take up
work that involves lot of experimentation
and labs. Almost everybody has gravitated towards computer.
No, no not really,
now the materials area has really expanded,
so people are looking at micro, nano scale things,
in every area, whether its mechanical or
chemical or metallurgy or whatever.
So those kind of current areas, a lot of people are working,
and then energy related research is also going on.
And you were aware of the combustion research also,
where you have helped us really.
Prof. Sundararajan: The combustion research NCCRD. Prof. Natarajan: You know for example,
Mmhmm, yes…there is a lot of potential,
we hope it will serve the country,
we can…we have very severe requirements in combustion.
And for…for example, you know Ajit Kumar
Kolar of Heat Transfer,
he almost transferred the
fluidized bed combustion facility from New York,
because he worked there and they did not have
much interest in that subsequently
to our IIT, but I understand that
the activities there are petering out.
People are interested in…
you know they…they like to do modelling of
Prof. Sundararajan: Modelling. Prof. Natarajan: FBC and so on, but not so much.
This is really something that is happening
all over the world, it’s not only for us.
Sir, experiments at the system level,
they don’t have much…
you know people don’t respect it very much.
You have to do work at the minute level at the point or may be
you know, extremely localized measurements done
all over you know, the system
and then get a lot of data and process the data,
also compare that with predictions.
So it has become more intense.
If you do experimental work at that level it is respected,
but system level measurements,
so…so you take an IC engine and
measure input output, that kind of research is not respected.
So it is difficult to publish that kind of work.
What has happened is
the students have become very sophisticated,
we require sophisticated instruments,
lot of money has been invested,
either you do research at that level,
or you know, experiments at system level
are not getting much respect,
that is the problem.
So it has become very expensive in the process.
Yes, you are right…
my…my faculty supervisor used to say
that nature and reality
are only in experimental work.
Prof. Sundararajan: Yes sir. Prof. Natarajan: What you do with computers and
theoretical analysis has to be validated
you know, by actual experiments,
but very difficult to…there are many…Murphy's laws are there
regarding experimental…if anything can go wrong, they definitely will.
I have one observation,
sir, when I came from Kanpur,
I found that in Mechanical Department,
all the labs were more or less isolated
and like water tight compartments,
Prof. Sundararajan: and people are doing work Prof. Natarajan: Yeah
you know, individually and not…
and most of the work is interdisciplinary.
Today in fact, you have to be doing interdisciplinary research
if you have to be counted.
So what is your observation on…you know, the earlier things
and how things evolved over a period of time?
See IIT Madras had a great advantage;
that the German system was adopted
because of the presence of the German professors
there and their assistance with being focused on
Indo-German kind of a cooperation and so on.
As a result of which, we invite several
very desirable practices from German system;
can you imagine, in a Mechanical Department,
Thermodynamics and Combustion is a separate lab,
Heat Transfer and Thermal Power a separate lab,
Hydro Power a separate lab,
Prof. Natarajan: you could not imagine in any other institute, therefore, Prof. Sundararajan: Yeah, yeah.
there was a certain culture
which was developed in each of these areas,
and I benefited from that because
Thermodynamics and Combustion are
naturally more closely related than,
let us say Heat Transfer and Combustion for example.
Therefore, there is quite a bit of basic studies
which happened in each of these individual…
they have…they are not different disciplines,
but different parts of Mechanical Engineering,
but grouped in a very…very wise manner.
So that was very good.
There are of course, some disadvantages of the German system;
are...[indistinct] you
when you are comparing IIT Kanpur,
all the faculty were put together in a faculty
in house, therefore the interaction was very intense,
whereas, in our Institute, except for the
few labs which were around the cafeteria,
so the faculty members…we used to go to the cafeteria together,
Aeronautical Department and so on.
Therefore, the interaction, even though
not much academic interaction takes place,
but still the fact that we were close to each other,
it helped in several ways.
For example, if you wanted to borrow some equipment,
and if somebody whom you knew
through your coffee interactions,
if you ask them, more often than not,
because at that time the pieces were just coming in,
and there were at much demand.
I have a few other things to talk about our Institute,
where I had some contributions to make.
Prof. Sundararajan: Yes, sir. Prof. Natarajan: And that is, I looked at the different systems
and I felt that, you see,
I brought ISO 9000 to IIT Madras,
the first IIT to have it.
Because, I had several interactions with professional people,
both though professional societies
as well as through my personal relations.
And then I found for example, in one of these companies,
it was ICI…which became subsequently the company.
They had ISO 9000
and you could feel the…the…the existence of ISO 9000,
the place was very clean,
the quality policy was exhibited all over the place,
and each person had a sense of responsibility
and belonging to that institution.
Therefore, when I discussed having it in IIT Madras,
the faculty member of cour…of course, felt that
it was not suitable for an academic institution.
But my argument, which ultimately prevailed over
that there are many activities in an academic institution
which are similar to what happens in industry.
For example, if…workshop if you take a look at it,
it is a shop where students are trained,
but also products can be made
and sophisticated equipment can be utilized.
Now library, administrative section,
they all have similar
you know, characteristics as the industry.
So…and for that you need a lot of
training of the technical and support staff
and not only that, you need a
certain amount of coordination among them.
So the two or three supplementary things we did,
which fell in line with what industry, it does.
For example, you have to define a quality policy,
you have to train the people in quality assurance.
So we had a lot of training programmes,
and you also printed the
quality policy because Toyota does this;
that is you print this at the
back of a calendar in a pocket calendar.
And the…that explanation for this was
that you keep it in your pocket, the gentlemen
and it is close to the heart.
It’s so, and I found subsequently at some meetings,
that our faculty members were very
proud of our institution having ISO 9000,
particularly the workshop people.
Because, when they move about with other mechanics
and the foremen and so on of other factories for example,
they were proudly mentioning that
IIT Madras has ISO 9000.
Obviously, it is not really applicable to academic activities,
where accreditation is the important means of assuring,
now there again I was very lucky,
that our…particularly our alumni in the US,
they kept asking, “How…
what is your quality assurance mechanism?”
Therefore, we had several committees
consisting of the best of
industry people and their faculty members
in different departments,
and they spent 3 days…
2 or 3 days, I forget which one,
looking at different departments,
and for me luckily, the Computer Science Department
and the Electrical Engineering Department volunteered
to be examined by a group of peers.
And we had a final mean…almost similar to the accreditation practices
which take place by…through MBA,
but this was not happening in the other institutions.
Subsequently, I understand
that the other IITs also did this.
So they had a very intense interaction
with the faculty members of the department.
And we were surprised in the administration that
Computer Science came forward,
because they were all very bright
and proud faculty members.
They took it very seriously
and every 6 months this happened
and at the end of the 6 months,
they had to report again back to the committee;
what changes they have made,
what improvements they have made.
Therefore, there were many good things that happened,
and the other thing that I was very much interested in…
in defining a strategic plan for the institution.
And, unlike many other institutions
where the all the Heads of Department sit together,
and over a period of a week,
they evolve a strategic plan.
Because I have contacted
several academic leaders in US,
and they all told me the involvement
and the participation of the faculty member
or the concerned stakeholder is very important.
Because yes, you can define the plan,
but if you want to implement it,
you need the cooperation and commitment of
the each of the faculty members.
So that is something that we did.
And I’m glad that the practice is being continued
under the present administration, also they have
come up with two other strategic plans,
but I am little disappointed that
they did not show as…as reference
for their thinking and activities,
the plan that Professor Ananth and I had
Prof. Natarajan: Come…come up with. Prof. Sundararajan: Yeah.
And, for the first time, I use external
faculty members and industry specialists
to advise the IIT.
Normally, IIT was considered to be a resource,
where their knowledge and the experience
is transferred to the other institutions,
but never you receive the valuable inputs
Prof. Natarajan: from the people around you, so. Prof. Sundararajan: Especially in industry.
Prof. Natarajan: From industry and other…other faculty members also. Prof. Sundarajan: Yes [indistinct]
Because, because one of the…
like an oxygen for you know institutions is benchmarking.
Prof. Sundararajan: Yes. Prof. Natarajan: Industry follows it so very extensively.
Prof. Sundararajan: Yes, sir. Prof. Natarajan: That is your…there are other people
who are doing similar things,
and some of them are doing it much
better than you are doing.
And, if you want to succeed and
move forward and upward,
then you need to see what others are doing,
there’s an excellent definition of benchmarking,
and that is to find out what others are doing,
and then replicating what they are doing,
emulating them and then going forward
from what they have done.
And I’ve had a discussion with Ramadurai about this,
and he said, “For each part of the activities
of the institution, you can have benchmark institutions.”
But now of course, MIT recently had a study,
they wanted to evaluate their undergraduate programme.
They chose about 8 or 10 institutions,
who are doing a very good job,
and the…in this context, you might also know that
Olin University, near Boston
is considered to be the best undergraduate institution.
There is a ranking for undergraduate institutions.
And there are faculty members
with Ph.D. who come there,
they sacrifice their research work
and…in the sense that
they do not engage in research work,
but then engage in
many different ways of transferring the knowledge
and experiences from the existing faculty members and the
industry around them for…to the students.
I understand those…they do not take a large number of students,
and they are in great demand by
Prof. Natarajan: industry in the government. Prof. Sundararajan: Yes, sir.
Sir, from the time I joined…
one small thing, sir.
The industrial and sponsored research problem…projects,
and they have really increased quite a bit
over the last 20-25 years.
So what is your view on this, sir, the observations?
I would say that it is because of the
leaders who led the Institute,
and the…nationally,
as you…as you know…the initially…they said their
Prof. Natarajan: focus was on research: published or perish. Prof. Sundararajan: Yes, sir.
Prof. Sundararajan: Yes. Prof. Natarajan: And subsequently consult and publish or perish.
Prof. Sundararajan: Yes. Prof. Natarajan: Consulting basically means the industry oriented work.
Therefore, because of the
pressures on these institutions
to do different things,
obviously the institutions also started promoting
these activities and creating opportunities.
In this context one of the best things that happened
was the technology development missions that we had,
We had 8 missions or 9 missions of the [indistinct].
Therefore, the inter-IIT collaboration was also…
because in different IITs, there are
people who is doing similar things.
Prof. Sundararajan: Yeah. Prof. Natarajan: But unfortunately, though it was not continued beyond
the first…first stage of about 5 years or 6 years,
you still do not know why.
So the planning commission which was coordinating it,
but now the NITI Aayog has come,
and they are putting some opportunities
in front of the different IITs.
the inter-IIT cooperation is very important.
Sir, some of the major projects that have been done
in the Mechanical Department…the Institute…
in fact you have also…yourself coordinated many of them;
the major projects that have been done from Mechanical.
Yes, apart from the technical projects,
we were given the opportunity
Prof .Natarajan: to do…engage in curriculum development. Prof. Sundararajan: Curriculum development.
So again because of Dr. Ramchandran,
he has interest in
academic, educational activities.
So our Curriculum Development Centre was a very active centre.
Essentially you had to provide some inputs
to the faculty members of the surrounding institutions,
because there are so many things that need to be done.
Because, the situation between IITs
and the other institutions is rather alarming,
because many of them, they…
they don’t have the facilities nor the faculty members,
but at the same time, they do not have the
will and the…the focus on engineering education.
Prof. Sundararajan: Yeah. Prof. Natarajan: Sop that has been one of our hallmarks.
Some of the good things that happened
after I left IIT Madras,
were two or three things: one was the NPTEL.
Prof. Sundararajan: NPTEL. Prof. Natarajan: It actually…I…I sowed the seeds for NPTEL
behind the help of the Carnegie Mellon University
and also Professor Raj Reddy of CMU.
Now it has ultimately become swayam,
Prof. Sundararajan: Yeah. Prof. Natarajan: And you know, involving several things.
Prof. Sundararajan: Yeah. Prof. Natarajan: And the other thing that actually flowered
the…was this focus on R and D and interaction with industry,
and under Professor Ananth's leadership,
you have those research stars,
for example, it seemed to be quite active and bringing the
the industry and the other R and D institutions,
you know DRDO has a…has a complete floor of activities.
And, our alumnus Ramanujachari is heading it.
So this was again something which was
actually Ananth's achievement.
We had the land, and it was a curious circumstance
where we realized we had the land
Prof. Natarajan: given to us outside the Prof. Sundararajan: Outside.
IIT and we did some survey and
things like that and we found out and so,
it was possible to set it up.
There were some competitive interests also
that they wanted that that particular land
because land is so eagerly grabbed by everybody,
but we had a formal agreement with the state government.
So that is something else
which has become extremely significant in IIT.
Sir, one more programme we have now is GIAN,
I do not know if you have heard of this or not.
Prof. Natarajan: Yes, yes. Prof. Sundararajan: It is a Global Initiative for Academic Networking.
So every year we get about 100 faculty
or so, from different countries.
They come here and spend a week or 2 weeks and give
specific courses on very specific topics.
So that is also it has picked up quite well and…
A very good initiative,
I have been involved in similar activity
through something called IUCEE;
Indo Universal Collaboration for Engineering Education.
And I was one of the founding directors.
It is doing extremely well.
It also provides opportunities in many other ways;
guidance for Ph.D. for young faculty members,
and many other things.
That is something that is happening.
One of the concerns of the central government also
has been our lack of presence in
the international rankings, global rankings.
I have done some work on that
and I have been assisting in a very small manner
Indian Institute of Science,
through what is called ICAR:
Indian Committee for Academic Rankings.
There are many procedural matters in addition to
the existing core of their rankings
which is really the research performance.
The manner in which you present the information,
the manner in which you ask all the faculty members
to publish papers until the same…you know kind of a heading.
For example, if you say Department of Chemical Engineering,
and things like that it gets a…it…the…the computer moves it
into a different…the different place.
IIT Madras should be available in every paper,
only then will it be counted
along with the other papers for that particular institute.
Because some similar…simple thing,
but the more important things are
publishing in Scopus indexed or…
journals which have impact factor.
The young people in order to increase the number; quantify,
they…they publish in several different journals.
You know this is something which will act
against the Indian journals,
because they are not counted.
Now, the question is, it’s not the number of papers,
as you know, it is the quality;
How is the quality defined?
Either through the Scopus indexing,
there may be the…some difficulty,
but that’s a different thing.
And then journals having impact factors.
Therefore, the young faculty members…because…
because I go to different institutions now,
they should publish only in journals
which have a certain minimum amount of quality,
only then, because they want to show
some publications for their promotions,
they published…and again the conference proceedings,
that is a different type of activity.
Prof. Sundararajan: Yes, sir. Prof. Natarajan: They are not actually identified,
even though at the moment there are some indexes
which also take into consideration good conferences.
For example, IEEE conferences,
ASME conferences and so on,
but they are in a different compartment altogether.
Yes, sir. In fact for our promotion, we count only the Scopus indexed journals,
we don’t consider other journals at all.
Then the question is, then
why do you want to publish in other journals?
Prof. Sundararajan: Yeah. Prof. Natarajan: Becau…once you have published it,
then you cannot publish the same thing or parts of it
in Scopus indexed journals,
therefore it is a…it is a very simple analysis.
The…the question here, interesting question was suggested
as things for discussion CRD Narayanapuram.
See, I have gone through the origin and the
demise of the CRD.
Many of us felt that it was not in our mainstream activity.
For example, if you look at a faculty member,
what does he gain out of involvement in CRD activities?
At the moment the industry is doing it through CSR.
Right, because it will be counted,
it can be shown as desirable worthwhile activity.
CRD there were couple of problems: one,
a loan was taken, at one point of time,
the…the…the loan plus the interest was so great
that there was no way that the IIT was able to…
would be able to repay.
And therefore, an exemption was sought
when P. Chidambaram was the Finance Minister.
Again, the Director who actually originated that idea,
Professor P. V. Indiresan, he talked to quite a few people
to make sure that the interest
did not accumulate over the years,
and also to write off that particular loan
which was not a great amount of money.
But the activities…to some of us felt…
to what extent they enhance the
value of their activities for the IITs. This was one.
Secondly, there were a lot of people employed,
because there were lot of semi-skilled activities
which have to be done.
And these employees of these society, for instance,
wanted to be absorbed as the IIT employees.
That is a very serious…
Prof. Sundararajan: Yeah, Prof. Natarajan: it has very serious political implication.
So these two things in particular, they…
so it’s…we have to learn from past experience,
particularly bad experiences,
and these two are not compatible with what IIT had to do.
Prof. Natarajan: [Indistinct] Prof. Sundararajan: Sir, one more interesting question.
Prof. Sundararajan: I have some…one interesting… Prof. Natarajan: Yeah.
over the last 3-4 decades the JEE exam
also has been undergoing some changes,
and coaching…effect of coaching also has been very strong.
So, do you feel these have really influenced the
quality of the students we are getting,
into IIT at the undergraduate level?
In the initial stages when I was there,
we…tried to find out, or people tried to find out
what is the reas…what are the reasons for the success of the IIT.
In other words, all the graduates that they produce,
they are prized products which go as input
to several places; both in India and abroad
for teaching, for research and…for industry.
And people talk about our IITs not having
many contributions for India,
that’s absolutely wrong.
If you look at the major industries
and public sector organizations in India,
many of them are from the IIT system.
Even research organizations, sir;
Prof. Sundararajan: many of the research organizations of IIT Prof. Natarajan: Not only.
as a postgraduate…PG students from IIT have gone there.
Prof. Natarajan: No, no, no, no. Prof. Sundararajan: In ISRO, NAL.
Yeah, but the ISRO people who are part of the ISR…ISRO success story,
they are graduates, postgraduates from IIT.
Prof. Sundararajan: In the IIT. Prof. Natarajan: Therefore, we have a lot of contributions. In fact, BHU,
that it felt very sorry that an…it is an iconic institution,
that they were being criticized
for not contributing to the
national development in different areas.
And they have published a booklet
indicating their major alumni
who have indeed contributed to the
Indian industry, R and D.
It’s a…it’s a huge number of people.
Therefore, all IITs have done that.
That was one, that’s was…
so JEE was considered to be the principal reason
that we were able to pick up the
best talent within the country.
And of course, you can also criticize it,
because the talent that it picks up,
Prof. Natarajan: they are not interested in staying in India. Prof. Sundararajan: Staying.
We…we…we are we are criticized for brain drain.
There are two types of brain drain;
I have done a little bit of work under brain drain.
One is the external brain drain, when our people,
they study in India and then go abroad
for postgraduate work and
even subsequently they settle down there.
The other one is the internal brain drain,
where you train our students for technology,
but then they take up non-technology occupations and
put it…that is the internal brain drain.
Prof. Sundararajan: Internal. Prof. Natarajan: There were reasons for both.
Now ultimately, it is all related to the national culture.
Now, when Gandhiji was leading the independence movement,
there was a fervor, there is a desire
and a very keen desire to serve the country.
At the moment, you look at the corruption,
you look at the political scenario,
and then you wonder
why the young people are not motivated to…
even then there are people who do rural work,
but the…that spirit of service, the spirit of doing work
for other people, they soon become cynical.
This is the…basically the problem.
So JEE therefore now, with 23 IITs.
The catchment area has also increased.
Prof. Sundararajan: Increased. Prof. Natarajan: And as I said, when the IITs start; the new IITs,
they don’t have the type of facilities nor the faculty members.
It is a shame that we have a
faculty shortage position of all IITs of about 30 percent.
Why, if all…students are keen to join IITs, then they expect
good faculty members to not only teach them,
but all to also to inspire them,
why is it that that the such a large number of faculty?
Of course, one of the reasons given is that we want the best
and therefore, we wait for the best to come. Yes, that may be,
but then, just like you want to enhance the
catchment area of students for coming to IIT,
similarly you have to provide for teacher training institutions;
institutions which create good teachers. We need to do that
and I don’t think it has been done enough.
Prof. Sundararajan: Yes, sir. Prof. Natarajan: Because, you have several alternative professions now,
where business and money
are more important than anything else.
So, I…I think the demand for IIT seats
will continue to increase.
So, it is our responsibility to
provide for that fulfilment of the demand.
Yes, yes. Sir, from the time you joined, to once you were retired,
so what major changes did you observe in the campus and
the good ones, the bad ones?
No, I mean the bad one we have talked about,
Prof. Natarajan: because it…it doesn’t seem to… Prof. Sundararajan: Yes, sir.
interest the young faculty members and the young students.
The level of discipline…of course, I also get the information from
our IIT and other IIT in terms of faculty interactions,
the level of discipline; discipline is the word
which is not compatible with
the current day young students and faculty.
But, you…you…you…you don’t have to have discipline like in the military,
but unless people are organized,
people have a common purpose,
it is difficult to achieve success.
And, it is said that you have to get the faculty interests
and the institutional in…interests aligned.
They must both be interested in similar things
which are desirable things to do
that is not happening, there is a lot of…
whether it is because of…you know, the diversity
that is…exists now or whatever,
that…that they do not seem to be interested in similar things.
And if somebody is not able to cope up with many subjects,
no point in him being there and…
and that is why our Professor Indiresan's…
he gave them a way out,
by giving them a BA in Technology Arts,
but that did not work,
because many people said,
“We came to IIT for a B.Tech. degree.”
not for the [indistinct] degree kind of a thing
Yeah, but everybody cannot do everything.
So at some point of time you should
recognize your strengths and weaknesses
and that is a very mature decision one has to make.
And the parents have to chip in
and help them to do this,
and one example…set of examples people can give is
all the great…the Steve Jobs and Bill Gates and so on,
they were all college dropouts.
Prof. Sundararajan: Dropouts Prof. Natarajan: I mean there is a reason for that.
Because they felt that they did not gain anything
Prof. Natarajan: through that…going through the academic studies, Prof. Sundararajan: Formal education.
but they had other innate abilities,
Prof. Sundararajan: I mean Prof. Natarajan: innovative capacities
which they could pursue to perfection
and then make a name in that particular area.
So these are things, it is a mature aspects…
you cannot expect an 18 year old
Prof. Natarajan: student to recognize these things. Prof. Sundararajan: Yes, sir.
Sir, you have any advice to the faculty and students
for sustaining the excellence in IIT Madras?
I don’t believe that we have reached the peak
Prof. Natarajan: and we need to sustain Prof. Sundararajan: Yeah, we still have to go a long way.
I bel…yeah…I believe you have to go higher and higher and higher,
because one of the things that I have been involved
because of my presence in AICTE
and also my interest in engineering education is
that all institutions cannot become world class institutions.
The world class institution is a…actually a best in class institution
that is a better definition of that.
In order to do that, it’s not only important to work hard,
but also as they say in industry, you have to work smart.
Prof. Sundararajan: Okay. Prof. Natarajan: We have to choose, there is a decision making process
that has to be adopted
to choose the activities, first prioritize.
Prof. Natarajan: First prioritize Prof. Sundararajan: Yes, sir.
what is important for yourself and
for the institution, and then focus all your energy
Prof. Sundararajan: Yes. Prof. Natarajan: In order to excel in those things and it’s not easy.
Prof. Sundararajan: Yes, sir. Prof. Natarajan: For example, take a look at teaching.
So much of learning resources are available
both online, as well as in the libraries and so on…
the…it’s a constant struggle for the faculty member
to be one up on the students.
And therefore, the present
model of teaching-learning doesn’t work anymore.
It is a collaborative learning
Prof. Natarajan: that one has to participate in. Prof. Sundararajan: Right.
The teacher does not know everything
and the student is…doesn’t start from level zero.
So it is a cooperative mutually beneficial activity.
Prof. Sundararajan: Yes. Prof. Natarajan: So, the…these processes have to change.
There is a disruption occurring in education
in particular, and technical education
because technical education has technological factors
which need to be taught
and which need to be imbibed.
Therefore, as I say, there are a lot of opportunities,
but also a lot of challenges.
Prof. Sundararajan: Yes, sir. Prof. Natarajan: In the…the…the…the trick is in balancing these two
and ultimately, as they say,
if you have a tendency to speak the truth,
you don’t have to have a good memory.
Prof. Sundararajan: Yes, sir. Prof. Natarajan: Because, you will never go wrong in your discussion.
That is something else that is…
as…I would like to mention this:
We had a matured student
who succeeded as an entrepreneur,
and we asked him, “What did you miss learning in the IIT?”
He said, “You never taught us how to be bad.”
In the sense say…say falsehoods
and look…look for cutting corners and things like that.
Within the IIT it is an ideal situation, idealistic situation,
because there are specific modes of behaviour
and you have to do the…almost always the right thing;
whereas, you come out of the campus,
and all this one has to forget
Prof. Natarajan: in order to learn new things, bad things. Prof. Sundararajan: Yes, sir.
But…so we are doing a service
and a disservice at the same time.
We are showing them what would the right way to do things,
Prof. Natarajan: but at the same time that doesn’t seem to help him in life…. Prof. Sundararajan: Yes, sir.
many of them, not…not all of them.
Therefore, the world has to change,
we don’t have to change.
Prof. Sundararajan: Yes, sir. Prof. Natarajan: The world has to change
and somewhere along the line, we have to get together
Prof. Natarajan: and change the world. Prof. Sundararajan: Yes, sir, yes.
So, as long as you are in the IIT,
remember that you are in a good system,
Prof. Sundararajan: Yeah. Prof. Natarajan: And, there’s no reason to be sorry
Prof. Sundararajan: Yes sir. Prof. Natarajan: That you are not being taught the bad things.
Prof. Sundararajan: Yes, sir. Prof. Natarajan: Okay.
Yes, sir, thank you, sir!
Thank you very much for asking good questions
and motivating me to answer.
Prof. Sundararajan: Yes sir, Mr. Kannan Krishnamurthy: I edited your video long back
when I joined in 2005 in IIT Madras, and
2007 and 8, when I was making a documentary for
alumni…actually alumni affairs.
I edited you with…when you were inaugurating Sharavathi Hostel;
Prof. Natarajan: Did I do that? Mr. Krishnamurthy: a small video clip.
Oh I see, okay. Thank you, thank you very much.
Mr. Krishnamurthy: Thank you, sir. Prof. Natarajan: Nice interacting with you.
Mr. Krishnamurthy: Thank you so much.
- Contribute
to the Centre -
Monetary
Support - Digital
Material
Prof. M.S. Ananth in conversation with Prof. R. Nagarajan
Good morning, Professor Ananth. Good morning.
Sir, its always a delight to talk to you and the
especially in the context of this
Oral History project that the Heritage Centre has undertaken.
So, I would like to start by
asking you to describe your life
before you joined IIT Madras as a faculty
member, and then we will
talk about your life here.
When I grew up in Chennai,
I was part of a joint family,
went to a Tamil medium school till 4th standard
then switched to a convent because my mother was
concerned that I...I wasn't learning English enough.
And then, couple of years in a convent then
went to Madras Christian College High School.
We had a wonderful headmaster there Professor Kuruvila Jacob,
he was a really enlightened man. He made...
I think he made learning a pleasure overall,
he never believed in any punishment,
although he carried a cane with him.
And he used to punish us when
we were caught doing some mischief and sent to him.
He would swish the cane very hard,
but very close to your hand, it will never hit you.
In fact, I remember one classmate of
mine moving the hand getting hit, he said,
"Silly fellow, don't you know I miss always?"
He said...(In Tamil) Like that
So it was simply symbolic, but it was a
wonderful experience being with him in...
And later we started this Kuruvila Jacob initiative.
We started the Kuruvila Jacob initiative.
My classmate started it, I also helped with them.
And so that was a good experience,
then I was in Vivekananda College for one year,
that was also a wonderful experience.
The teachers were very good, uniformly good,
although at least half of them didn't know
how to keep discipline in class.
120 students many of them who made noise, but...
I think they were remarkable in the sense
their concentration on the subject was so much
that they didn't even notice that the students made noise.
So, we had really good teachers in Vivekananda,
then I joined A. C. College of Technology, and...
That's because back then, IIT Madras was not...
No, actually I applied, the...I got a letter
for saying I hadn't paid the postal order,
my postal order didn't reach them.
So I can't write the JEE. Oh.
And it...it was no big deal, because in those
days the other colleges were as good. Yeah.
The state Universities were run very well.
A. C. College had probably a better chemical engineering
department at that time than anybody else here in the South.
So, there was no...this thing at all.
So I joined A. C. College, I had a very nice time,
five years there, and Dr. Laddha was the Director
of A. C. College.
He was a very serious man,
but it turned out that he had a sense of
humour once you penetrated the
initial layer, but he kept a
very serious face.
In those days I think many
faculty did that...they...because, they
didn't want the expression voice
if you give them little space,
they will climb on your shoulders.
So, essentially they were very strict,
but they were very nice, they were very focused
and Professor Laddha was very clear that
while he was Director, Administration will
not consume his whole time.
So, the Registrar will turn up between
2 and 3 for signing any paper.
If he came before 2, he would be shouted at,
if he came after 3 he would be shouted at.
Professor Laddha said the rest of it was
his research time, he can't interfere.
But those were days when people
listen to older people.
So I think in that sense, the administration
was easier. Then after I finished, I went to
University of Florida in those days, I mean
we didn't know anything about the US,
I got a 1st rank here, but
I wasn't sure that I was clever enough to do good in...
too well in graduates type school,
I didn't know anything about it,
and only Florida offered scholarship.
So I went to University of Florida,
but they had at that...in that year they got a Centre
of Excellence grant.
In those days it was
500,000 dollars and it was a huge amount of money.
So they had a lot of good people
and I had quite a few young faculty who were
very good. One of them was
Keith Gubbins, and I worked with him.
I worked on molecular theory.
When I finished, I came back,
I wanted to come back, I applied actually,
I applied to all the IITs, I got no
answer from any of them, March 1971, I wrote a letter
saying "I am likely to finish in one year,
I am interested in a faculty position."
Then out of the blue in March '72,
I got a letter from IIT Madras, the first IIT to reply.
And they offered me an Assistant Professor position.
It turns out that Dr. Ramachandran
who was then the Director, had come to the US
For recruitment, and about 19 of us in the US,
he spoke to people we...whose names we had
given as references,
I didn't know about it till much later,
then he made the offer directly as Assistant Professor.
In those days it was very hard to get Assistant Professor
we were very lucky, because if you became
Lecturer, it took eight to ten years to become Assistant Professor.
And, that was the rule, but,
we were...19 of us were lucky, but
I think out of 19, only two or three stayed.
The rest left almost immediately.
I think what people don't realize these days
is that in those days, the money
was a very severe constraint.
I would say up to about '90. In fact, '99
when Natarajan was Director, the budget was still very small.
And in '99, it was the first year when
Murli Manohar Joshi suddenly tripled the budget,
and after that we have been
comparatively very comfortable. Yeah.
As far as budget goes.
So but...I joined as an Assistant Professor,
initially I didn't understand, there was
some slight hostility. I think understandable
hostility because people didn't understand why
these young fellows were given Assistant Professor's post.
But, I was very clear that I had
to be friendly with colleagues in order to stay in an institute,
and within six months, most of them were very friendly
and they were very helpful.
Professor Gopichand was
Head of the Department, and he was a very liberal person,
he let you do...he was sort of
whatever you wanted to do, as long as it was not
anything illegal, he would say "Yes."
And...in those days the Registrars were very strong,
or at least appeared to be very strong.
And of course, I had a run in with couple of them
in those days, but Professor Gopichand called the
Registrar and said, "He is a young man,
he is very enthusiastic,
he is a very good faculty member
here so, you shouldn't trouble him."
But he would say it very nicely,
and that made a difference, then the Registrar
softened a bit, and so on.
So overall, I think he made life
much easier, but the colleagues also, after six months,
the first six months, you could feel
a slight hostility all the time, but after 6 months,
I think that's true of IIT Madras,
it doesn't take to newcomers Yeah.
very well.
But within a few months,
everybody seems to settle
into a comfortable slot with them,
and then they are very helpful.
So, this was true, but by and large,
I think IIT Madras was considered, and was
a very conservative organization.
I think the difference was because
of the first Directors in various places.
And, in particular Kanpur had Kelkar
as the Director, who was a very very liberal man.
And I think that made a difference to the starting of Kanpur.
Also, they are hiring...they hired faculty
more autonomously the,n
in some sense as the way we did it.
I mean, all the other IITs were more conservative in this regard,
I think the advantage there was that,
Kanpur was connected to the US
through a consortium of universities.
Including MIT, whereas, we were all...
all the others were connected to the
countries that help them,
through the Ministry of Education. Ok.
And, that made a difference to the whole attitude.
R. Nagarajan: But I think we also had an interface through
University of Aachen We had,
but the universities were referred to us by... Ok.
See, after about 10 years,
we got to know the Germans well enough.
Then we could practically
tell them what we wanted. Sure.
Professor Wittig I think, was the first one,
'73 or something he came,
one year after I joined.
I...I was no...never in the picture because I was too...
low in the hierarchy. But I heard stories,
and Professor Wittig said, "You guys have reached a
level of maturity and we should be able to
deal directly with the Technische Hochschule."
So then, we had a very good interface with the Germans,
before that, many of the Germans who came,
were not academically the best,
but they were still very very committed people.
We had a few people in Chemical Engineering also,
they are very committed people,
but I won't say they were academically the best.
I mean later on when we got to know the Technische Hochschule,
we knew that the best people didn't come.
After that, after '73, after Wittig's visit,
a lot of these people came from
the best schools, and they came for
short visits, which is what
you would expect of a faculty member who is busy there,
but those short visits were very useful.
But overall, I think the German
connection, had also many plus points,
I found the discipline.
The level of discipline in IIT
Madras was better than
anywhere else,
and secondly, there was this
sincerity, the commitment and this thing, if you said
something, you did it.
I think the Germans,
we probably, we were naturally also that way,
but they emphasize that so much,
that it became...and the workshop again,
was very different,
but, the Germans
were able to run it with discipline,
because they were able to convince
people, that was...with something very useful.
So I think there were some, this thing, and
after all, we are all young institutions,
even now we are only 70
years old. So I think...like...the solution
to a differential equation, the dependence
on the initial condition is very strong.
So there is still a this thing...
although we have changed considerably
in the last, maybe 30 years.
Speaking of differential equations, you know
I was a student here from '76 to '81
and I remember taking Fluid Mechanics and Yeah.
Thermodynamics with you, and...
so did you enjoy teaching those courses particularly Yeah.
to IIT students, how was the experience?
Yeah yeah, I...I think I enjoyed teaching all the time,
I am sort of...naturally liked students,
and that helps because students
then like you reciprocally.
And...in fact, I was also warned
that these students are very intelligent,
but they will take advantage if you give them allow them,
if you give them an inch they will take a...
large amount of space.
But my experience has never been that.
In 40 years of teaching in IIT,
only 2 students crossed the line
where I thought they had...and I could
tick them off immediately, but otherwise they don't.
But, I think the big advantage I had
was, that I was much younger than most of the other faculty
So...and I was able to talk to
the students much more.
I remember back then all the
students wanted to do their projects with you,
and they all wanted your reco letters to go abroad.
No, I had more contacts in the US than most people.
Many of our...my older faculty members
had contacts with Germany, but students
weren't going to Germany, so, in that sense
I was saying but, I think more importantly,
while teaching undergraduate students, my
experience in those days was,
they were mischievous, but I remembered
exactly how mischievous they...
My classmates and I had been in A. C. College
so I had a...I always keep...kept that memory.
So it was clear as to why these kids were behaving the
way they were. But, I think the one thing I
found was, that whatever I knew well, I could teach them,
and they never complained about the paper being too hard.
They complained only when you were not uniform
in your grading, or you were partial about something.
Otherwise I found they never complained, and this is in contrast,
you see, much later I went to Princeton
for sabbatical, '82-'83.
And I was teaching this reaction engineering course and after
mid-semester, the...Professor Schowalter
who was the Head of the Department, he met me in the corridor
and said, "Ananth did you give a very hard mid-semester exam?"
I said, "I didn't think so why do you ask?"
He said, "There has been complaints
of your accent after 2 months."
If they had complained in the first week,
I would have had to take them seriously,
but since they complained now...
and it turned out...then I spoke
to the class and said, "What's your problem?" They said,
"You taught five hours of polymer reaction engineering,
didn't ask a single question
in class...in the exam."
And our kids never did that
Yeah. to me, yeah.
So I think, in a sense, they...
there the undergraduates were very demanding.
And they felt they had...they judged you. Right.
And, they asked you,
"Why you didn't ask a question with us?"
I said, "I thought that was my right."
Yeah, I remember you use...I think you were probably
one of the first faculty to offer take home exams and...
Take home didn't work though,
take home I got too many copies of the same.
But, open book exam
yeah I was probably the first
to give an open book exam, I think I have never
given anything except an open book exam,
and I remember the very first batch,
I gave an open book exam, and
they all brought the mini books.
But I had told them the main book
was Smith and Van Ness in thermodynamics and
so, this kid brought Smith and Van Ness,
he looked at the question paper,
he...I was invigilating,
he looked at me and said "What page?"
And I said, "113" just spontaneously.
And so this kid opened 113, it so happened there was
a worked example there, so he copied it and he got a zero.
So he came and complained to me,
"I asked you the page number, you gave
the page number" I said, "This is a free country,
I will give any page
number I want. After that they never asked me a question "
in the exams, but I think they got
used to open book exams. They realized that
open book exams were no easier than closed book exams.
So... So you are...over your four decades of teaching,
at the...have you seen a change in the in the students
composition and make up in...?
Well there is a change, but there is also a change in me.
So I think I would say, the big change
my...my perception occurred really in
'85-'86 when we switched from
five year to four year.
There was some immediate
change in the attitude of the students.
The five year students I think
felt there was a lot of time.
And so, they were much more relaxed at least for four years,
three to four years, they were...they enjoyed themselves.
After the four year batches came,
they seem to think that they had to rush through everything.
And secondly, I mean, there is always a
fraction of students who were an absolute pleasure to teach.
That fraction remains, and when you go into
class you try to find those four, five faces
that show the 'before' and 'after' look.
I mean when they understand something, they will smile
broadly.
I think that is important,
for any teacher, and that four or five always
remained, but I think the fraction of students,
who wanted marks, but who weren't willing to work very hard,
that increased. Right.
And, I think it was also related,
thinking back, I think it was related to the fact
that its around '90s
when the state universities started deteriorating badly.
There was lot of political interference in the university,
the Vice Chancellors appointment itself was somewhat political,
and these things led
to a continuous deterioration in the state universities
so that, now the difference between
IIT and the state university is huge.
See everybody wants to get in to IIT,
and they want to get into IIT for the wrong reasons.
I won't say all, but there is a small fraction that
certainly gets in for the wrong reasons.
And they can dilute the atmosphere.
See, its not as if students
were always studious, I mean nobody is. Right.
I mean, you study only when something
interests you,
or when you have to.
But I think this large fraction,
and I...I keep quarreling with
I used to quarrel with Professor Indiresan,
because he introduced the notion of relative grading.
It was always relative grading.
I...you can never do absolute grading, because any paper you give,
if its very hard, you are going to see if...
everybody it does badly, then you are going to moderate
it in some way, but you know you shouldn't have said it.
Professor Indiresan discussed it in the Senate and
came up with a formula for large classes,
x bar by two was a pass mark.
And...with the result, the students got the impression,
if all the kids did badly,
x bar would go down, x bar by two would go down
further and they would benefit.
These are calculations that in...all kids do.
Everywhere.
I think the mistake was
probably in discussing it.
Similarly, the other mistake
historically, and this is not the blame the people involved,
I mean Professor Indiresan was very interested
in students in fact, he was very very popular.
And Professor Srinath andz...
had a long discussion on attendance,
and I remember he introduced 55 percent
as the minimum attendance required.
And in the next term,
next semester, after three classes,
after mid semester, there was nobody in the class.
And then the kid said, "55 percent we have got sir."
And then they came back, but this is part of their fun.
I mean what else will they do on a campus if they leave?
So they came back, but I thought this
idea of discussing attendance, discussing
the way you grade,
is something that should be done with...among faculty it should be
reasonably transparent if somebody demands justice.
Butu otherwise you don't
have to go around explaining everything to them.
And these were...those were two big events that
changed the character of the students and their attitude.
Other than that I...there has still always been a
fraction of students who are so good,
and they don't necessarily sit in front, they are distributed in the class.
But they are so, interested that they make your life very
happy.
So, I can't complain at all.
So, one interesting thing we are finding is the
number of girl students seems to be disproportionately high
in Chemical Engineering, about 22 to 23 percent of the
entering class is now girls, so did you see
during the time you are teaching because we didn't have too many
girl students in the early years, but
was there a difference among the boys
and the girls in terms of how they...
There was...that again after this...I mean
I...I am not connecting the two,
but around the time in five year to four year
batch. After that, the communication between
the boys and the girls seemed to decrease.
For some reason.
so, in fact I had to tell my class,
if the girls were not present, I said "Make sure the girl knows,"
and I will catch one of the fellows and say,
"You are particularly responsible,
you must communicate this,"
otherwise they won't tell the girls. Sure.
And then you have a quiz on
something, and the girls don't come.
And then turned out they went and found.
So that kind of lack of communication was there.
I think, by and large they were alright.
A few girls have complained to me saying that
the boys have the advantage of being
able to discuss among themselves.
And therefore, they do much better and, "We are not
allowed to do the discussions," turned out the
discussions were after 11 at night,
which is when the boys got...
So you can't change the rule and ask the girls to Sure.
be permitted to go to the boys'
hostels at 11 so, that was...
Where do you think the department as a whole has
evolved over the years from the time you were there?
I think all departments, the research
content has increased, of that I think I have no
doubts at all. By and large, I think its also has to do
with our hiring, when we ask more questions about
research, about what people do and so on.
And, as I said after 2000, we have had plenty of money,
it's been reflected in the increase in publications. Sure.
In fact, 2002 to 2011
when I left, the publications went up
from 400 to 1200.
So there was three times the
increase, its simply that there was more money available,
and more young faculty were hired because
they were good at research. In fact
I remember one of my colleagues told me,
he was a wonderful, he was really good teacher,
I don't want to name him, but he told me,
"Sir the IIT cheated me."
I said, "What did they do?" "They only asked if
I will teach, and after joining
they told me 'you have to do research.'"
I mean, it is something that you have to
get used to, and if you are told then you have
mentally prepared for it and so on.
So, he was very intelligent, but somehow he didn't,
he said, "I have never thought of researches thing."
He was very practical, he did a lot of consultancy,
but what he said, I think was true that,
there was no job, clear job
definition in the beginning days. Right.
They only wanted sincere people
who would teach undergraduates.
But it turned out that if you have an academic
institution of any reputation, you will need research,
and then this gathered.
And, the science
departments of course, always started first in research.
Because there is a tradition of research in science.
In engineering it is much newer.
Now there is, but in...even when I joined,
the number of publications
in engineering was one third
the number of publications in
science, whereas, there were only three science
departments, of that Maths was not very prolific.
Chemistry was maximum, and then Physics.
So I think this notion
that you need to do research in order to
just make a claim for your reputation
and all that, came much later.
How about industry?
Professor Ramachandran introduced,
Professor Sengupto apparently never
spoke about research. Professor
Ramachandran tried to introduce it, he introduced the
postgraduate programmes and emphasis on research.
Sure.
But he stayed only for one term.
And I think then, the thing went back a bit.
And have...have industry relations
deepened over the years, has that been a...
I...I think again IIT Madras was a
pioneer in this, when the Germans introduced this and I think
in '73 it was Wagner, Professor Wagner
who first brought up this Industrial Consultancy
in Sponsored Research, and the idea was a
wonderful thing.
I mean it made the
interface with the industry much easier.
Right.
And, I would say, a
fraction...the number of faculty
involved in consultancy has always been somewhat low.
I think even now it will probably be 20 percent.
It used to be even less in those days.
Except for Civil Engineering and. Ocean.
Subsequently Ocean Engineering.
So there there was a natural inclination to do Right.
practical work.
But, I think overall,
we had this notion that
we had four obligations in IIT:
teaching, research, industrial consultancy
and improving technical education in the country.
That last thing we hadn't done very well,
by and large we had gone to these
other places, and told them how to
set up the lab, but it was a one-time advice.
You didn't check whether they got the right
things and so on.
So that wasn't
there, and in fact, it was under
that, that I started the NPTEL much later.
Because there was shortage of faculty
everywhere, and I said, "At least we
can contribute that," and,
that turned out to be a good time to start, and
we have...now have what,
the largest collection of technical
We have more than a 1000.
Lectures in
courses, you know, largest open collection. Right.
In the world.
So, I think
that has worked out quite well,
but the industrial...again we needed
to take the industry interaction
to one higher level, which is
when we thought of the Research Park.
Actually, the Research Park happened because...
did an analysis, very informal analysis
of some 100 patents, IPRs
in Silicon Valley between '90 and '99.
About 70 percent of them had Indian names in it.
And out of that 70 percent
had IITian names in it.
So, well, you know the story I went to MHRD
and told them that...I quoted Louis Pasteur
he said, "Discovery is the result of
chance meeting a prepared mind."
And I said, "We have been preparing minds for 50 years,
and chance is meeting them in Silicon Valley,
so it's time that's chance met them here."
Then he said, "What do you mean?" I said, "I need a
place where industry and faculty
and students can all meet." But it has
to be right close to the campus, because
otherwise I can't ask my professors
to go there and come back and teach.
They will have to do the teaching research
and then they also have to do that.
And, fortunately for us in '99,
they closed down the...'98 they
closed down the MGR Film City
which was 40 acres of land just across the road.
So, I urged Professor Natarajan one day to write to the
State Government asking for land
for starting a Research Park.
We had no idea what a Research Park was at that time,
then we worked out things and said...
and then apparently Ashok Jhunjhunwala
came to Natarajan with the same request.
It was just a coincidence, and Natarajan
asked me, "Did you talk to Ashok?" I said, "No."
Then he said, "He also came and spoke to me about it."
I said, "It's a good time to ask for the land."
So we asked for the land, and we finally
got the land and, but the idea of
setting up a Research Park was mainly because of
all this creativity that was...
you know, on which we were losing money.
This innovation that was happening in Silicon Valley,
we were the authors, and
they were the beneficiaries.
So in that sense I think it was an
important thing...it so happened that the timing
was right, and a lot of people said "Yes",
who could have easily said "No."
So the Chief Secretary gave us land
for a very nominal sum, I mean the least amount is very
small, 30 years, and the MHRD had
to say "Yes" to start the company, Section 25
company that would...now Section
8 company that can hold shares.
And, the planning commission said "Yes"
and...I had done some homework, I had called
Montek Singh Ahluwalia twice and initially
the Planning Commission objected,
but I had talked to him when he came for a talk here,
and he said it's a wonderful idea.
So, I called him.
And he said "Its a wonderful idea," I said, "But the
Planning Commission is objecting to it," then he
said, "Look Ananth, not all
papers come up to me," I said, "Now it has."
And next morning Planning Commission supported
us, and they called me and said "Sir, we are all
in favour of the Research Park."
So I mean in various ways,
then the Finance Secretary,
she was also very nice about it.
They had never done it before,
but she said, "Ok we will take a chance."
And, once we created a Section 8 company,
we could take loan,
and that loan has also been returned.
I think the timing...it was...that's a matter of luck,
timing was just right, and now
phase 2 has also been completed.
So, the Research Park and NPTEL were the big thing.
Actually, I had a policy sort of,
MHRD everybody always complaints about MHRD
interfering, telling us what to do, and so on.
My contention to the Senate was that if
we don't keep MHRD busy, they will keep us busy.
So we should have two, three proposals
that are very large, that require a
lot of permissions, Yeah.
and you must keep on asking them,
"You see I sent you the file, what happened to it?"
So they hesitate to call you and
ask you to do this.
I think there, the Senate should play a role
in envisaging where we are going. Sure.
And that, we still don't, because we get so
busy with routine, we're still arguing
about what has already happened and...
we don't seem to plan, and in that sense,
the first time we had a strategic
plan that told us what future
should be like, was when
Madhav Rao Scindia became the Minister.
And he asked all the boards of IITs
to come up with a strategic plan,
it was supposed to be 2010,
and our board took it very seriously,
Natarajan took it very seriously.
He hired a
gentleman called Ganapathi,
who was an...Professor of Management.
In fact, initially there was lot of resistance to him,
like all things in IIT Madras,
initially when he came people said, "Oh,
he is a management man he will talk, but
he won't do anything,"
but he did a remarkable job.
Muthukrishnan was also in charge,
between the two of them, particularly
Ganapathi, he conducted 30 workshops
with various stakeholders in the campus,
and he was able to extract their opinions
in a cogent manner, so he
came up with a document
Ofcourse he wrote the document in
a very peculiar style, management style.
So I took his permission
and rewrote it in English.
I told him I...Ganapathi
became a good friend, so, when I told Ganapathi
I am going to rewrite it in English, "What do you think
its written in?" he said.
I said, "It's written in managese."
No, he had called the
Registrar a Chief Administrative Officer
and various fancy titles, Vice President,
President, things like that and,
I mean those are corporate titles
that just don't go well with...
so anyway, we rewrote it,
and it did give a good...
see it did two things, first thing
is it got the staff involved.
Sure.
And a lot of our staff are very intelligent
people, and they gave very good suggestions,
many of which were implemented.
Natarajan also started ISO 9001...
just before that. In fact,
I was Dean with him, I told him it's a
waste of time and all that,
but he said, "No no, you don't know,
we should do it," but I think it was a very
good thing in the long run, because, later on,
many of the staff told me, "Sir, for the first
time we were consulted."
And academic section was full of suggestions.
Many of which were implemented.
Simply because Professor Gokhale who was in charge,
made it very clear that ISO simply means
"You do what you say,
and you say what you do."
And we weren't doing that, we had
many rules which we thought were
not necessary, we didn't follow them,
but we had them there. So the ISO
fellow will come and say, "Where is this rule,
where is the implementation?"
And nobody knew.
Then we got rid of those rules.
So, I think we have made a lot of changes,
and they came out very well.
And, around that time, I think when
Professor Swamy was Director, N. V. C. Swamy was Director,
I was...in the last year of his
term, He made me Dean of Academic Courses.
And talking to Professor Swamy, I felt that
there was tremendous amount of
what you called oral history.
Which he alone seemed to know.
I mean he had a terrific memory,
and he remembered from '59
he knew things.
So when somebody said something,
he will say, "Oh, we discussed that in
1963," he would say.
And, I was very impressed with
how much he knew about the background.
And we are not very good at documentation,
even in IIT we are not very good at documentation.
In fact, one of our problems has been land also,
this land the MGR film city land, plus
other land, all of it turned out to be...
to have been allotted to IIT in '59.
We didn't take possession.
So, I think these are things that if the...
if we had good documentation, it would have had helped.
It's not just the IIT Madras, I think all
IITs are guilty of this. We also had
problems with the layout,
the piping, and the wires and all that, we...
I mean we didn't know where the wires were.
And when we dug for a plumbing defect,
we ended up puncturing the wire.
So these things happened in...
this thing, now I think we have a much better idea.
We have done a lot of...
and, I think the alumni were first
contacted by Professor Natarajan.
In '97 is when he first started his...
he said we have to get hold of alumni,
and relate to them. And I still remember that
was the 25th year of the '72 batch.
'72 batch and there were several
chemical engineers in that batch.
And the...I knew them, I had
not taken classes for them, I had joined and I
just knew them. So they
came to me, I was Dean Academic Courses,
and they wanted to give money for scholarship.
This is the story I like saying because
it sort of set the tone, because that's to the...
these six of them came into my room
and said, "We have...we want to give...donate
money to IIT for scholarships,
but how do we know
it will be used properly?"
So I turned around and said, "How do I
know you earned it properly?"
They were absolutely shocked,
I said, "Look I mean no offence, but
you asked the question, it provokes an automatic
question on my part." And, I said,
"As far as the IIT is concerned,
we will not take money from
arbitrary donors, we will take
money with humility from people
who give it with humility."
I said, "Both should be subservient
to higher cause called IIT."
And they got very angry, they went up to Natarajan and
said, "Your Dean said how do we earn,
how do we know you earned it properly."
So Natarajan called me,
I went up and Natarajan said, "Ananth,
I am trying to cultivate these kids and
here you are immediately provoking them."
I said, "I meant exactly what I said."
Amazing people, alumni still ask that
kind of question maybe I should repeat your
answer to them.
No actually, these...these...I said "I meant
exactly what I said."
I think we should
remember that education is a higher goal
that both of us respect.
You don't have to respect me, but you respect education,
do you respect IIT and give the money.
And I will take it with humility when you give it to IIT.
Then, actually they came back the next
morning, 9:30 they were back in my office
and they said, "We completely
agree with your philosophy,
we will go with it."
Many of them are good friends of mine,
they didn't mean any...this thing, partly,
these B. Techs. when they come back,
somehow when they first come to campus they
seem to go back to their old days. Yeah.
So they ask the same cocky questions and the
same cocky comments.
That they would have done when they were 20.
They don't mean it, but it...it sounds
nice.
Yeah.
So, they say it. I...it...then it worked out
very well afterwards, and, but
this is a question that's often asked, they
don't realize that IIT actually spends money
very carefully and it's well
accounted for, and there are statements that will
always be made. But so, it's been
a pleasure dealing with them, and after that, when we
started this in alumni relation, Satyanarayana
was first in...Professor Satyanarayana was in charge.
And then Professor Nagarajan took over, it turned out
absolutely to be a revolutionary change.
He brought in so many changes
in the alumni...this thing, and the alumni began to feel confident,
and we went on trips every year.
I think during my time, we got about
35 crores or 40 crores total donations and all that.
Of course, that's much less than what we get now.
But its grown over a period of time,
and it was a good time, because the...many of the
students I found, many of our alumni didn't know
that things had changed since they left.
They still remembered IIT as it was
when they left and it didn't change much
because we had no money.
But once we had money we were making
changes here faster than most universities in the...West
Sure.
And once they realized that,
and then they came together and so on.
So you were the first two term
Director of IIT Madras, and how to...
how was the experience
from the first term to the
second term?
I had...there was no change except that
I was reluctant initially to take a second term,
but on the other hand, I had
started this Research Park.
I mean maybe if I had known how difficult it would...
it would have become, I
may not have started it at all, but
sometimes ignorance is bliss where it's folly to be wise.
And I started it, and it was going,
but everywhere there were hurdles.
Many, many hurdles, I mean
separately I have talked about the Research Park journey,
but I felt I shouldn't leave it halfway.
So, when they called me for a second interview,
in fact, it was peculiar, I had told
the Secretary that I will not come for a second term,
I mean I will not come for a second interview,
because if after six years you don't know
whether I am good or not,
you can't know through an interview.
And, the Secretary called me
and said, "I remember you are telling me this,
but please come, we have
political compulsions which require that
we interview everybody we appoint,
even if it's a second term."
So they did that.
Although I think they have appointed
Ashok Mishra for a second time without
this thing and then,
there were some...too many discussions,
people raising doubts
"Why did you appoint?" and so on.
So they finally decided to go with the
interview process. But I took the second term
only because the Research Park was...
had progressed to a point,
and in India, your personal relations
are what seemed to matter.
I had by then known people in the Planning Commission in
the Revenue Department and the MHRD,
I knew them very well.
So I felt I could help
in getting it.
I think I did help, finally
2010...it was before it was finished,
and once the Research Park was in place,
I quit in 2011, one year before...
my term was over, but because I had
finished more or less what ideas I had for
IIT.
But, I think overall the co-operation
that I got in IIT Madras is...is
something for which I am always grateful.
I mean it's not that I haven't had arguments,
but there was a principle in IIT Madras that
I...I don't agree with the Director,
but I will go along with him.
That attitude many many faculty have.
So while they will argue vociferously,
when the decision is taken, you have find the
co-operation levels are very very high in IIT Madras.
And that helped tremendously.
And we had others, I mean everybody knows this,
but somehow, you feel it only when you
sit in that seat, I think.
This is a
small township, where if you are the Director you
also look after water supply.
And...and the hospital and things like that.
So there were too many angles to the whole thing.
I mean on the one hand, on the education front,
you can't be static, you have to make
changes as and when required.
So, for example, we introduced this M. A.
in English, which turned out to be very popular,
and then we had Engineering Design,
and we got 8 crores from Ashok Leyland,
and Bosch, and they didn't interfere at all.
Everybody said, "If you take money from the industry,
they will interfere."
I had an advisory
committee with members from both, the top people
in the committee, but they really didn't interfere at all.
I mean they will interfere, in the sense they will
ask you questions, but that...they have a right to
opinion as much as you have, and if you are
convinced, you have to argue and convince them.
And I found it took time,
but they invariably were willing to listen.
And I think one of the biggest strengths of the IIT
system is the Act of IIT.
And, that act has been a source of great strength,
but you have to take full advantage of the
autonomy that the act gives you.
If you don't study the act, and if you
don't assert your autonomy, I think you will lose it,
that's something that worries me about the future.
In fact, there are occasions when...and I am not blaming the
Secretary, in his seat I would have done the same thing.
But, the Secretary would say,
after we have made a decision in the Senate,
Secretary will say "No no take my advice."
I said, "When I have 150 Professors
advising me, why would I take your advice?"
He said no, "I have a lot of experience,"
I said, "I won't tell you stories
about what experience means, but
I am not going to take your advice, besides
you read the act, you can't interfere
with me in academic matters."
Then he said, "You have read the act?" I said, "Yes",
and then he said, "No, ok I won't read it,
but I will take your word for it."
So, finally, he yielded, but they tend to say
things and if you accept, if you
don't object right on the spot,
then they think its disobedience, if you go and do it later.
So my feeling is, we should thrash it out
with them, and if there is a quarrel, there is a quarrel,
and you have to settle the quarrel by discussion.
And I have never had difficulty with any of them.
I have...I have seen six Secretaries,
but in all cases you have to be
open and transparent. Sure.
So that has always helped.
But...I think the potential for the IIT
system is tremendous, but we still have a long way to go.
So we had the Golden Jubilee, for example,
and it was a good time to recollect.
And I made a summary of things that,
in my opinion we had done right
and summary of things we needed to do.
Golden Jubilee in 2008 and the Research Park
haven't come yet.
So at that time, I pointed out
that we were doing the right things
in several things, like the best universities in the US.
For example, in hiring a faculty
and hiring and getting students,
we had a system by which we are getting the best,
at least the best we could get of the people who applied
we did a very serious...this thing.
And then we allowed research of course,
by that time DST had copied the NSF method and all that.
So, we were essentially exposing the research proposals to
market of ideas, where the best ones survive.
So if your proposal was good, you got funded. So
again, that was filtered very nicely.
We also realized young faculty given
academic freedom, bring refreshing ideas to the system.
I think that's peculiar about the IIT system,
the universities are much more hierarchical.
They don't have an opportunity to express their ideas.
So that was another thing that we were doing right, so
in many things we were doing right, but we hadn't
done right in some issues,
and I still think some of these issues are open.
The first one is that we have very little
to show in biomedical research.
I mean while there are spots of excellence,
the overall contribution in biomedical
terms, is much less than for example, in the US,
and the reason is that the US has
medicine and engineering in the same campus,
campus we don't.
So unless you have a place
where doctors and engineers meet constantly,
and like I always say over good food,
you don't get such fruitful interactions.
Most of their best discoveries
came from such interactions.
So I wanted medicine to be included,
Arjun Singh was the Minister, and he was very nice about it.
In a council meeting I proposed this,
and he said, "The act right now says
you can give education in engineering,
arts and science."
He winked at me in the
meeting and said, "We will add comma medicine,
nobody will notice."
But unfortunately they noticed.
And the health ministry noticed, and when it went to parliament,
it was turned down.
And, so that
was very unfortunate thing, the other thing
is I think, we ought to have
I know it makes it more difficult to administer,
but a little higher component of humanities in our education.
I think humanities...having humanities
education, we scientists and engineers
tend to think everything is deterministic.
Somehow we think if we do A,
there is a causal relationship we will get B.
But society is so complex, and the whole thing...
you don't get B, you get B prime which is very different
from B.
And to understand that,
you need a humanities background, you need to
understand that even in science,
there is a considerable subjectivity
in your...this thing.
And that...automatically frame of mind comes in
if you have humanities, a strong humanities department.
We have treated them as service departments and so
they have never really picked up.
So I think during my time and now,
we have increased the number of humanities faculty considerably.
We take more Ph. D. students there and,
I am hoping that will strengthen.
Because if you go to a place like MIT,
there is a history department out of which
one fellow knows so much about history of science,
that you wonder whether he is not a scientist.
I mean I met one fellow in Princeton,
who could discuss Newton's laws
and the way they evolved, how they were
explained what Newton himself said.
I mean I didn't know any of that,
I was amazed that how how language had
played a role in the overall
understanding of physics itself.
So do you think having more free electives
in the undergraduate curriculum is going to help us in terms of...
Yes, but this is a very peculiar thing in India.
I think more free electives are required, but you see
there is no point giving electives to people
who don't know how to choose.
So simultaneously we have trained the students to
learn to choose and that will happen if society becomes
more independent.
In society they are very
dependent on the parents, so when they come here, they're very
dependent on you as a faculty member.
In fact, in Chemical Engineering, you know that, I mean
when you were students and all that, students will
peep into my room and say, "Should I take linear algebra
or partial differential equations?"
I would say, "Toss a coin."
And they would be very upset with me.
I told them, "If you don't know which one, just
toss a coin it doesn't matter."
And I think, that idea of being able to choose...
there in the West, they grow up very independently
from the time they are small.
They are asked
to make choices, and so they become...I am not
saying one is better than the other, but if you
want to use the western system of electives,
you also have to have kids
who know how to make the choices,
and live with the choices, you always make mistakes,
I mean, I make...may make a mistake, you may make a mistake.
But, if you are used to making the decision,
then you get used to living with that mistake and
correcting it, whereas here,
I have seen a lot of people
blame their parents, blame their
teacher for choices they make.
So, many...many alumni would say that
you know, it's the activities outside of the classroom
that, you know, help shape them during their...
I think that's true everywhere.
The problem with alumni is very
often, they do undergraduate here, they do graduate
school there, and they compare the two.
These two are not comparable.
What is...what you can compare is undergraduate here, and
undergraduate in the US, then they will discover that
there is not that much difference.
I think that's...that's a mistake they make,
when you go to graduate school in the US graduate
school, you are pampered, you are looked after very well.
Here you are pampered in a very different
sense, as an undergraduate, in the US
undergraduates are handled with
what I call 'careful indifference.'
They had handled with indifference,
but they are so careful that they don't get sued.
Whereas, I think we spend a lot of
time on undergraduates, we have always paid attention to them.
But, I think more importantly, this...
I mean there are few things that we haven't done,
there is something in the US that's called 'publicness',
which protects universities from interference
by the government that funds them.
Even if you get all the money from the government, the government
still...there are lines that the government can't cross.
We don't have such structures,
and I think we ought to develop those structures,
because, see, by and large we have had good secretaries,
but there can be secretaries who are very
autocratic.
And they will have their way and they tell you
what to do, and I think that
interference should be completely eliminated,
and universities are places where we will make
mistakes, but we will correct ourselves.
And I think that freedom, you need.
The other thing is...we also need
protection from people who say,
"What's the use of your research?"
One of the fundamental things about the university,
as a Renaissance concept and subsequently,
is that the...there is pursuit of learning,
there is pursuit of learning in life.
But in the university, the pursuit of learning has
two important characteristics.
One is, no immediate use
and then second is attention to detail.
Others will call it quibbling,
but we are supposed to quibble so, that you lay
your foundations very carefully,
and...I mean I always keep quoting Gibbs,
Gibbs's treatise, after 150 pages of a
statistical mechanical treatise,
first time he writes it down.
He calculates the specific heat of argon,
and doesn't agree with experiment.
So he writes saying, "We must consider our
methods tentative, because we don't
get agreement with experiment."
I mean after 150 printed pages he writes this line.
Two years later when they measured the specific heat of argon,
Gibbs was right the old experiment was wrong.
And, it's remarkable that the person
does this with such care, meticulous care,
and has the humility to say this at the end of it,
that's the nature of the university.
It doesn't have anything to do with...and in fact,
some of my colleagues in the industry say,
"You people don't take realistic constraints into account."
The whole idea is not to
consider realistic constraints.
Realistic constraints are for the industry,
or for you also in a different role,
when you are a consultant, you have to take it
Sure. into account but, as a Professor,
you should only ask what is the conceptual difficulty
in tackling this problem, and I do not
worry about other issues.
In fact, I keep quoting my very first
consultancy was for the small industry in Ambattur.
Who wanted me to design a heat exchanger
for the flu gases that were...to recover
heat from flu gases that were leaving the chimney.
This fellow gives me this problem, and I was
trying to work out an optimal solution for it,
when he calls me and says, "Make sure
you use two inch pipes," and I said, "What's
the holy...this thing?" What he said, "My neighbour
has gone kaput, he is selling...
giving away two inch pipe practically free,
so that will be the cheapest heat exchangers that I can..."
Then he told me, "Don't make it longer than
four feet, because otherwise I have to lift the
ceiling, which will cost me two lakhs."
So given these constraints, the solution was
only to arrange number of pipes and arrange them in a...
But that's not heat exchanger design, I can't
teach this in class, because this was
peculiar to this particular situation at that time.
So I think the idea has not to introduce
any real life constraints. They are
things that you have to deal with as a human being,
in your real life, but it's not something
that belongs to the university.
R. Nagarajan: But increasingly, the trend is for faculty
R. Nagarajan: to actually start companies, in fact,
R. Nagarajan: even in Chemical Engineering there were several faculty
Yeah, R. Nagarajan: who were doing...
but I am hoping in their minds, they will keep these two separate.
When I teach in the university, I am only doing...
I am dealing with conceptual difficulties and understanding. Right.
And, the whole idea that I have been saying
all the time, the university is looking at unity in the knowledge
around you, I mean you have diversity
around you, but all of it can be explained by a
few laws, at least that's an assumption.
And we have been able to discover. I mean
Newton found laws that unified so much.
So these are...it's also a fact that we have
discovered these laws, but it's an article of faith.
So that's called an assumption in the Renaissance thinking.
The second assumption is that
that unity can be discovered only by pursuit
of social and natural sciences, simultaneously.
I think they don't realize the importance of humanities.
The...I mean my favorite story is also about
Gibbs's assumption in...when he treated
isolated systems, that the microscopic states
were all equally probable.
He made that statement, I suspect,
I mean if he had made other assumptions,
he would have got wrong results, he would have gone back finally
arrived at that.
But his very first assumption was that.
And I think it was influence of Marx.
At that time there was communism, there was a notion that
God is just...he makes everybody equal and all that.
So this notion, would have
influenced your thinking.
And I don't think it does it explicitly,
but it sort of sets the tone for it.
I think it's important to be...
to realize this, and to include it.
One of the things that I wanted,
I mean I...I didn't achieve any of this,
but I...what I wanted in the Humanities Department, this is
after what Wilson said in Harvard,
the biologist. He was pointing out
the reason humanities got left behind,
because, you see about 100 years ago
humanities and science were equally
important in Cambridge and Oxford you know...
in even the big places, but they have
subsequently lost their premier standing.
And he said its because, we scientists and engineers
look at the...all information over the
entire electromagnetic spectrum,
whereas, the humanities are still confined
to what the senses see.
They are talking about what you see,
what you hear, what you smell\,
that's a very small fraction of the total spectrum.
And he is saying humanities should take
that also as human experience,
and build an holistic picture around it.
Right now they are building a holistic picture around
inputs from five sense organs, and that is
just not enough to cover the all of science.
Sure.
So I think that's an important aspect,
for that you need people with
combined talent, I mean somebody who has done
Physics and then done a Ph. D. in
Philosophy. Bring him in as a
faculty member here.
You need that mix, we still don't have that,
partly because we don't have a big enough department.
I think those are necessary,
and we haven't done that,
I think many US universities do that.
At least they always have a few people who are like this,
and these mavericks make the change.
And we don't have those mavericks at all.
R. Nagarajan: I think you and Professor Ajit Kolar
R. Nagarajan: were instrumental in starting the Heritage Centre,
when you were the Director, how do you think
that shaped up so far and
what's your vision for it, going forward?
I...I think basically, 70 years is not too much history,
but on the other hand, there is a certain
continuity. I mean I have to
tell you what Radhakrishnan said in another context,
President Radhakrishnan said...
he talked about tradition,
and he talked about problems in Hinduism.
He said the problem in Hinduism is,
that the followers seem to
mix...mix up tradition and truth.
He said, "Truth is God," that's all, he closed the chapter there.
But he talked about tradition and he
said...I don't remember the exact words,
he was quoting Goethe, but he said,
"Tradition certainly provides continuity
from one generation to the next,"
but he says, "It also ends up with vain memories."
And I think that's...you...you have to be very careful about,
you...you have to be careful that you don't allow
tradition to cloud your future thinking.
So you must keep the continuity,
but keep only the fundamental
ethical continuity in tradition.
So the Heritage Centre like ours,
should do that, and if you take a
history of IIT's performance,
I think you can't keep people entertained
or engaged for more than half an hour.
70 years you can summarize in half an hour,
if you make longer films nobody will listen in my opinion.
But I think if you keep doing that, and studying it every year,
at some stage we will see a thread of continuity.
That thread that characterizes
what you would call the 'local culture.'
Country like India is very big,
there is a difference between
Bombay and Madras and Kanpur and so on,
but it should come out...it doesn't come out
obviously, because it's not so clear.
But I think it will come out
if you study such...this thing.
So, if the Heritage Centre produces one
film every year, about the continuity...about
what has happened, and if you study these
films together, some good Humanities Professor
will be able to tell you the trend.
And what probably is recognizable, is the
strength, our strength and what's
the weakness in what we should eliminate.
So my own vision for the Heritage Centre is,
it has to be dynamic, it has to capture what
has been done.
And, I...I think we are still behind now,
I think the Heritage Centre
has pictures up to about
2000, so, 17 years is a long gap.
We should put in more things theret,
because, this is also part of history now,
and we need to keep it to a minimum,
to see what is essential, what characterizes that age.
And, I think we have to ask those questions now
so that you can...because there will always be
local things that happen everywhere.
And if you keep recording them, you will clutter up the
place without a sense of continuity.
For example, this sports, or
for example, C-Phi for example,
is a wonderful thing.
Because your batch
provided the support for it, but we
started it as a hobby workshop, and then it
expanded to the C-Phi, which was done very well.
I think C-Phi again has to be
rethought from time to time.
At the moment it seems to be dominated by
all applications that require electronics.
I think it should be possible to think of other applications
R. Nagarajan: Yeah
and get them in.
And I think we need to do this dynamically,
none...you can't sit on your laurels at all.
We don't have enough laurels to sit on.
So, I think it has to be
continuously thought out, but one of the important
things I need to...I want to emphasize
for the IIT system as a whole,
is I think we have to explain to the
ministry and we don't do this well enough.
We don't do two things, one is we don't explain
to the ministry that you may say this is obvious,
but we need to say this again and again,
that research is open ended,
they cannot ask us to complete a research
project in so much time.
I mean by saying that, they are constraining you.
So then, you pretend that you have completed it,
but then you go back, the same
project comes back again
in another name. I think this
confessing what...this is what I keep saying,
confessing to one's ignorance
is both a privilege and a responsibility of an academic.
And, because you confess,
and another IIT doesn't confess,
the Secretary will think that other IIT is better than you.
You have to live with that, till he finds out that the other IIT
only said...didn't say it, but they also are...
I think we have to as a academic
community, recognize the fact that we are
dealing with ignorance, and we will never solve it fully,
but we will make sincere progress towards
clearing it. I think that has to be made
clear, and we have to make it clear that it's
expensive, and we cannot afford to
ignore it in the long run, simply because history
tells you that we ignored it from
1300 to 1800 when the British landed here.
What...after that we have been under colonial
rule for 200 years, and the loss that we
incurred because of that colonial rule,
there is no comparison to the investment
that you should have made for having
equal universities, I mean Oxford and
Cambridge we could have created here.
Historically we missed the bus
long time ago.
I think those are important things,
it's not because, I mean one
A is good at it or B is good at it,
it's simply that the nation can't afford
to ignore any aspect of...
So I feel that that's...I mean the
protection about publicness that I talked about,
Charles Vest, spoke about it when he came here
from MIT. I think they have those structures, we don't.
We need to do that, and we need
to more and more make
suggestions about what we want to do in the future,
our Senate should do that.
I think there should be one senate meeting every year,
if I had to play the game again,
in which I will refuse to discuss any current problems.
Only discuss what we should be doing.
We won't be clear, we will say
vague things, people will quarrel, but it doesn't
matter, out of all that, something will emerge. R. Nagarajan: Right.
And I think that's an
important aspect of its, personally.
And then history will record itself.
So, thank you so much Professor
Thank you.
Ananth for spending time with us, it's been a fascinating
conversation, maybe we should do
'Part Two' sometime.
No, thank you. Right.
No, and one of the problems is that if you start me on
this topic, I don't stop so...
- Contribute
to the Centre -
Monetary
Support - Digital
Material